The effect of colpectomy on lower urinary tract function in transgender men.

Background: In transgender men, effects of colpectomy on voiding function are unknown, except for the incidence rates of urinary tract infections and urinary retention. Aims: To provide insight into the effect of colpectomy on Lower Urinary Tract Function (LUTF) in transgender men. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted among transgender men who underwent colpectomy between January 2018 and October 2020. Primary outcomes were objective and subjective changes in voiding. Secondary outcomes were transurethral catheterization length and the need for clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC). Results: Of 132 men, 89 (67%) underwent Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Colpectomy (RaLC) and 43 (33%) Vaginal Colpectomy (VC). Maximum flow rate on uroflowmetry decreased following RaLC (mean of 29.1 vs. 38.3 mL/s, p = 0.002) and VC (mean of 29.2 vs. 40.3 mL/s, p < 0.001) after a median of four months postoperatively. An increase in total International Prostate Symptom Score was seen more frequently following VC compared to RaLC. Subjective changes were indicated by 39%, more often by men who underwent VC, of which the majority improved during the first months postoperatively. Trial without catheter (TWOC) on the first postoperative day was more successful after RaLC (79/89, 89%) than VC (24/43, 56%). Secondary TWOC was successful in 22/132 (17%) patients after a median of eight days postoperatively. In 5/132 (4%) men (three VC and two RaLC), temporary CISC was necessary for a period ranging from 5 to 21 days. The last 2/132 (2%) men after RaLC were still performing CISC at end of follow-up. Eventually, 5% (two VC and four RaLC) had to refrain from genital gender-affirming surgery with urethral lengthening due to voiding dysfunction. Discussion: After colpectomy, most objective and subjective worsening in LUTF is of a temporary nature, however, 5% had to refrain from genital gender-affirming surgery with urethral lengthening due to persistent voiding dysfunction, despite the desire to void while standing.

Comparison of surgical outcomes and urinary functioning after phalloplasty with versus without urethral lengthening in transgender men.

Background: Phalloplasty in transgender men is performed with or without Urethral Lengthening (UL). To create clear expectations in the choice of UL, an overview and comparison of outcomes is useful. Aims: To provide and compare surgical outcomes and urinary functioning after phalloplasty with versus without UL in transgender men. Methods: A single-center, retrospective chart review was conducted among transgender men who underwent phalloplasty with or without UL between 01-2013 and 10-2020. Primary outcomes were differences in complication and reoperation rates. Secondary outcomes were end-stages of voiding at last follow-up and differences in voiding analyses pre- and postoperatively. Results: Of 136 men, 91 (67%) underwent phalloplasty with, and 45 (33%) without UL. Wound infection (31 vs. 16%, p = 0.06) and partial flap loss (35 vs. 13%, p = 0.008) were predominately seen after UL. In the UL group, 43% urethral fistulas and 60% urethral strictures were observed, relative to one man without UL who had a urethral fistula (both p < 0.001). Meatal or perineal orifice stenosis was seen in 29% with versus 11% without UL (p = 0.02). Reoperation was needed in 81% with versus 27% without UL (p < 0.001). At follow-up, 80/91 (88%) after UL reached end-stage of voiding, with 60/80 (75%) able to void while standing and 20/80 (25%) having a definitive urethrostomy. The remaining 11/91 (12%) men were awaiting further treatment for urological complications. The men able to void while standing had a median of one reoperation (range 0-6), and a significant decrease in maximum flow rate on postoperative uroflowmetry (21.4 vs. 29.8 mL/s, p < 0.001). After phalloplasty without UL, all men had a definitive perineostomy without changes in voiding analyses. Discussion: The choice for or against UL during phalloplasty has become more relevant over the years. This comparison of surgical outcomes and urinary functioning can be useful in the shared decision-making process to come to the most suitable choice of phalloplasty.

Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Bladder Neck Incision for Primary Vesico-Urethral Anastomosis Stricture after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy are Influenced by the Presence of Pre- or Postoperative Radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To report the intermediate- to long-term outcomes of bladder neck incision (BNI) for vesico-urethral anastomosis stricture (VUAS) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and the influence of pre- or post-RARP radiotherapy on these outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed with patients who underwent BNI for VUAS after RARP in a high-volume prostatectomy centre between 2006 and July 2021. Data was collected from patient charts. The cohort was divided into 4 groups: VUAS after (1) RARP-only, (2) RARP, but before salvage radiotherapy (SRT) (VUAS pre-SRT), (3) RARP and after SRT (VUAS post-SRT), and (4) primary radiotherapy and salvage RARP (SRARP). The VUAS recurrence rates, the ability to perform functional transurethral micturition and the post-BNI urinary continence rates were reported. RESULTS: BNI was performed in 90 patients. The median time between first BNI and last follow-up was 32 months (interquartile range 10-58, range 0-171). The majority of VUAS occurred within 6 months after (S)RARP. In those who underwent BNI, recurrent VUAS was reported in 12%, 57%, 29%, and 50% of patients after RARP-only, VUAS pre-SRT, VUAS post-SRT, and SRARP, respectively. Ultimately, transurethral micturition was possible in 94%, 93%, 71%, and 80%, respectively. Severe urinary-incontinence rates (>1 pads/d) were 6%, 16%, 10%, and 29% for RARP-only, VUAS pre-SRT, VUAS post-SRT, and SRARP patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Primary radiotherapy before RARP and SRT after RARP significantly influenced the success rates of BNI. Those who underwent BNI after SRARP had worse outcomes than patients who underwent RARP only.

Surgical Outcomes After Treatment of Urethral Complications Following Metoidioplasty in Transgender Men.

BACKGROUND: Several treatment options for urethral complications following metoidioplasty in transmen are described in the literature, yet little is known with regard to the surgical outcomes. AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical outcomes after treatment of urethral strictures and urethral fistulas following metoidioplasty. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted with transmen treated for strictures and fistulas after metoidioplasty in 3 tertiary referral centers. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the recurrence-free rate after surgical treatment of urethral strictures and urethral fistulas over a time period of 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 96 transmen included in this study with a urethral complication, 44 (46%) experienced a urethral fistula, 31 (32%) a urethral stricture, and 21 (22%) both complications simultaneously. The recurrence-free rate for urethral strictures following endoscopic management (ie, urethral dilation or direct visual internal urethrotomy) was 61% after 1, 50% after 2, and 43% after 3 years, compared to 82% following open treatment options after 1, 2, and 3 years (P = .002). Open treatment options were Heineke-Mikulicz procedure (7/9, 78% success), excision and primary anastomosis (3/3, 100%), 2-stage without graft (9/9, 100%), pedicled flap urethroplasty (1/1, 100%), and buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty (2/4 [50%] single-stage, 1/1 [100%] 2-stage). The recurrence-free rate for small urethral fistulas located at the pendulous urethra was 79% after 1, and 72% after 2 and 3 years, compared to 45% after 1, and 41% after 2 and 3 years for large fistulas, generally located at the urethral anastomoses of the fixed urethra. Treatment options for urethral fistulas were fistulectomy (26/48, 54%), fistulectomy & (redo) colpectomy (7/11, 64%), buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty (1/1, 100%), and retubularization of the urethral plate (3/4, 75%). A colpectomy before or during reoperation of a urethral fistula at the proximal urethral anastomosis showed higher success rates compared to without a colpectomy (7/11 [64%] vs 2/13 [15%] respectively, P = .03). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study provides insight in the treatment possibilities and corresponding outcomes of urethral complications following metoidioplasty in transmen. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths were the relatively large sample size and the overview of multiple treatment options available. Limitations were the heterogeneity of the cohort, underexposure of some surgical modalities, and absence of patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Open surgical techniques show better long-term outcomes in the management of urethral strictures compared to endoscopic options, and a colpectomy is beneficial before or during urethral fistula repair at the proximal urethral anastomosis. de Rooij FPW, Falcone M, Waterschoot M, et al. Surgical Outcomes After Treatment of Urethral Complications Following Metoidioplasty in Transgender Men. J Sex Med 2022;19:377-384.

Incidence of testicular cancer in trans women using gender-affirming hormonal treatment: a nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of testicular cancer in trans women (male sex assigned at birth, female gender identity) using gender-affirming hormonal treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of trans women starting hormonal treatment at our gender identity clinic between 1972 and 2017 were linked to the national pathology database to obtain testicular cancer diagnoses. The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated using the number of observed testicular cancer cases in our cohort and the number of expected cases based on age-specific Dutch incidence rates. Subgroup analyses were performed in testicular tissues sent for histopathological analysis at the time of bilateral orchidectomy, and when follow-up exceeded 5 years. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 3026 trans women with a median follow-up time of 2.3 interquartile range (IQR) (1.6-3.7) years. Two testicular cancer cases were identified whilst 2.4 cases were expected (SIR 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.1-2.8). In addition, one testicular cancer case was encountered in an orchidectomy specimen (0.1%). In the 523 trans women with a follow-up time of >5 years (median [IQR] 8.9 [6.4-13.9] years), no testicular cancer was observed. CONCLUSION: Testicular cancer risk in trans women is similar to the risk in cis men. The testicular cancer cases occurred within the first 5 years after commencing hormonal treatment, and the percentage of cases encountered at the time of bilateral orchidectomy was low. As no testicular cancer was observed in trans women with a long follow-up period, long-term hormonal treatment does not seem to increase testicular cancer risk.

Surgical outcomes and proposal for a treatment algorithm for urethral strictures in transgender men.

OBJECTIVES: To assess our results of surgical treatment for urethral strictures in transgender men, and to provide a surgical treatment algorithm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single centre, retrospective cohort study was conducted of transgender men who underwent surgical correction of their urethral stricture(s) between January 2013 and March 2020. The medical charts of 72 transgender men with 147 urethral strictures were reviewed. The primary outcomes were the success and recurrence rates after surgical treatment for urethral strictures. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 61 (25-202) months. At last follow-up, 50/72 (69%) were able to void while standing (after one [60%], two [20%], three [6%], four [8%], five [4%], or seven [2%] procedures), 10/72 (14%) await further treatment, two of the 72 (3%) sat to void despite good urodynamic function, and 10/72 (14%) had a definitive urethrostomy. Of 104 surgical treatments included in separate success rate analysis, 65 (63%) were successful (43/75 [57%] after phalloplasty, 22/29 [76%] after metoidioplasty). The highest success rates in short urethral strictures were seen after a Heineke-Mikulicz procedure (six of seven cases), and in longer or more complicated urethral strictures after two-stage with graft (four of six), two-stage without graft (10/12), pedicled flap (11/15, 73%), and single-stage graft (seven of seven) urethroplasties. Grafts used were buccal mucosa or full-thickness skin grafts. Success rates improved over time, with success rates of 38% and 36% in 2013 and 2014, to 71% and 73% in 2018 and 2019, respectively. We concluded with a surgical treatment algorithm based on previous literature, stricture characteristics, and our surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The highest success rates were seen after a Heineke-Mikulicz procedure in short urethral strictures; and after graft, pedicled flap, or two-stage urethroplasties in longer or more complicated urethral strictures. Finally, most of the transgender men were able to void while standing, although in some multiple surgical procedures were necessary to accomplish this.

How Sensitive Is the Neophallus? Postphalloplasty Experienced and Objective Sensitivity in Transmasculine Persons.

INTRODUCTION: Tactile and erogenous sensitivity of the neophallus after phalloplasty is assumed to affect the sexual well-being of transmasculine persons and, ultimately, their quality of life. The experienced and objective sensation of the neophallus and their association are largely unknown. AIM: This study evaluated experienced tactile and erotic sensation of the neophallus in transmasculine persons and investigated how this was related to objective tactile sensitivity. METHODS: Between August 2017 and January 2020, 59 transmasculine persons who underwent phalloplasty were recruited to participate in a prospective follow-up study. Tactile sensitivity of the neophallus and donor-site was measured (Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament test) and compared, and participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire about experienced sensation of the neophallus and sexual wellbeing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Experienced and objective sensation of the neophallus were measured by using a questionnaire and Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament scores. RESULTS: Neophallic tactile sensitivity was significantly reduced compared to the donor-site (n = 44), with the proximal part being more sensitive than the distal part (median follow-up of 1.8 years, range 1.0-7.2)). Sensitivity of the neophallus was not significantly associated with the surgical flap used, yet increased significantly with follow-up time. The questionnaire was completed by 26 participants of which 24 (92.3%) experienced (some degree of) tactile sensitivity in their neophallus. Erogenous sensation was experienced by 23 (88.5%). Experienced and objectified tactile sensitivity were not significantly correlated (Spearmans's rho = 0.23, P = .26). Answers to open-ended questions showed that results often do not match expectations. CONCLUSION: Tactile sensation of the neophallus was reduced in most transmasculine persons and improved slowly over time. A significant association between subjective and objective measures could not be detected. Although experienced sensitivity varied between individuals, the vast majority reported to have tactile and erotic sensitivity in the neophallus.Transmasculine persons should be informed that sensitivity of the neophallus will likely be reduced. Elfering L, van de Grift TC, Al-Tamimi M, et al. How Sensitive Is the Neophallus? Postphalloplasty Experienced and Objective Sensitivity in Transmasculine Persons. Sex Med 2021;9:100413.

Surgical outcomes of testicular prostheses implantation in transgender men with a history of prosthesis extrusion or infection.

Background: Testicular prostheses implantation may be used for neoscrotal augmentation in transgender men. In current literature, explantation rates range from 0.6% to 30% and most are a result of infection or extrusion. Information on the surgical path of individuals after prosthesis explantation is scarce. Aim: To assess the frequency and success rate of testicular prosthesis implantation after previous explantation due to infection or extrusion. Methods: All transgender men who underwent testicular prosthesis explantation between January 1991 and December 2018 were retrospectively identified from a departmental database. A retrospective chart study was conducted, recording demographics, surgical and prosthesis characteristics, reoperations, and outcomes. Results: A total of 41 transgender men were included who underwent testicular prosthesis explantation in the study time period. Of these, 28 (68%) opted for new prosthesis implantation. Most explanted prosthesis had a volume ≥30cc and were replaced with an equally sized one. The postoperative course was uneventful in 19 out of 28 (68%) individuals. Explantation of one or both prostheses occurred in 7 out of 28 (25%) individuals, because of infection (n = 3, 11%) or extrusion (n = 4, 14%). Patients that experienced complications had more often a history of smoking (p = 0.049). The explantation rate was lower if a smaller or lighter prosthesis was reimplanted (p = 0.020). Discussion: Most patients opt for testicular prosthesis implantation after previous explantation due to extrusion or infection. Explantation rates are higher than after the primary implantation procedure. Results of current study can be used to inform individuals on postoperative outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery With Versus Without Urethral Lengthening in Transgender Men.

BACKGROUND: In our institution, genital Gender-Affirming Surgery (gGAS;phalloplasty or metoidioplasty) in transgender men is offered with or without Urethral Lengthening (UL). AIM: The aim of this cross-sectional and retrospective study was to assess the effect of gGAS with or without UL on several Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs), and to identify predictors of overall patient satisfaction at follow-up. METHODS: A self-constructed Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) was sent to transgender men who were ≥1 year after gGAS. The survey comprises 25 questions divided into 5 domains: type of surgery, satisfaction with the appearance and functionality, quality of life, feelings of masculinity, and sexuality. OUTCOMES: Answers to the survey were compared between groups, and a linear regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of overall patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 154 eligible transgender men, the PROM was sent to 118 (77%) willing to participate, and 102 (66%) completed the survey. The majority previously underwent phalloplasty (n = 74;73%) compared to metoidioplasty (n = 28;27%). Urethral Lengthening was performed in 56/102 (55%) participants, 51/74 (69%) in phalloplasty, 5/28 (18%) in metoidioplasty. The mean number of complications and reoperations was significantly higher in the UL group (2.7vs1 and 1.6vs0.4 respectively, both P < .001). Most participants were satisfied to very satisfied with life (75%), the appearance (66%), voiding (59%), the effect of surgery on masculinity (82%), and confirmed that the end surgical result matched their expectations (61%), independently of UL. Lowest scores in satisfaction were observed for the sexual functioning of the neophallus, with 34% satisfied to very satisfied participants. Both satisfaction with the appearance of the neophallus (P < .001) and with voiding (P = .02) were positive predictors of overall patient satisfaction at follow-up, in contrast to the complication and reoperation rate postoperatively (P = .48 and P = .95 respectively). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Transgender men choosing for gGAS with or without UL can be adequately informed on PROs regarding type of surgery, satisfaction with the appearance and functionality, quality of life, feelings of masculinity, and sexuality. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Study strengths comprise the relatively large cohort, long duration of follow-up, completeness of the data, and innovativeness of the studied outcomes. Limitations are the cross-sectional and retrospective design, possible participation bias and non-validated survey. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in several PROs were observed between participants who chose gGAS with or without UL in this retrospective study. Additionally, according to this study, satisfaction with the appearance of the neophallus and with voiding were positive predictors of overall patient satisfaction at follow-up. de Rooij FPW, van de Grift TC, Veerman H, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes After Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery With Versus Without Urethral Lengthening in Transgender Men. J Sex Med 2020;18:974-981.

Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery Without Urethral Lengthening in Transgender Men-A Clinical Follow-Up Study on the Surgical and Urological Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Genital gender-affirming surgery (gGAS) with urethral lengthening (UL) in transgender men is associated with high urological complication and reoperation rates. Since 2009, we offer gGAS without UL to avoid these complications. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess what portion of the transgender men opted for gGAS without UL and to assess functional, surgical outcomes, and patient satisfaction after gGAS without UL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from patients' charts. The International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry, and 24-hour frequency voiding chart were used to assess voiding, and a self-constructed semistructured questionnaire was used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Transgender men who underwent gGAS without UL between January 2009 and January 2018 were included, and 56 transgender men were approached to complete the patient-reported outcome measurement. The simple statistical analysis combined with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. OUTCOMES: 68 transgender men were included. Median follow-up time was 24 (6-129) months. Uroflowmetry and the International Prostate Symptom Score were completed by 44 transgender men, whereas 13 completed the frequency voiding chart preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. The patient-reported outcome measurement was completed by 40 of 56 (71%) transgender men. RESULT: Postoperative surgical and urological complications occurred in 9 of 68 (13%) and 8 of 68 (12%) patients, respectively. Storage and voiding function remained unchanged. The median quality of life because of urinary symptoms was scored as "pleased." Sexual functioning and voiding were scored satisfactory and very satisfactory in 18 of 40 (45%) and 21 of 40 (53%) patients, respectively. The number of patients satisfied with the penis and neoscrotum was 25 of 40 (63%) and 26 of 40 (65%), respectively. Increased self-esteem was reported by 32 of 40 (80%), 32 of 40 (80%) would undergo the surgery again, and 28 of 40 (70%) would recommend it to others. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: gGAS without UL should be part of the surgical armamentarium in centers performing gender-affirming surgery. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study comprise the number of patients, the completeness of data, incorporation of patient-reported outcomes, and description of a relatively new surgical approach that may be well-suitable for a subgroup of transgender men. Limitations are the retrospective study design and the lack of validated questionnaires. CONCLUSION: gGAS without UL shows good surgical and urological outcomes. After extensive counseling, the majority of this selective group of patients shows favorable patient-reported outcomes. Pigot GLS, Al-Tamimi M, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, et al. Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery Without Urethral Lengthening in Transgender Men-A Clinical Follow-Up Study on the Surgical and Urological Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction. J Sex Med 2020;17:2478-2487.

Scrotal Reconstruction in Transgender Men Undergoing Genital Gender Affirming Surgery Without Urethral Lenghtening: A Stepwise Approach.

BACKGROUND: Scrotal (re)construction, scrotoplasty, is performed as part of gender affirming surgery in transgender men. OBJECTIVE: To describe, step-by-step, our scrotal reconstruction technique in transgender men undergoing genital gender affirming surgery without urethral lengthening. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 29-year-old transgender men underwent scrotal reconstruction and phalloplasty without urethral lengthening. For this purpose, the traditional scrotal reconstruction technique in patients that undergo urethral lengthening was modified. The patient is placed in lithotomy position. A pedicled horseshoe-shaped pubic flap, clitoral hood, and U-shaped labia majora flaps are used for scrotal reconstruction. The inner part of the labia minora (this is used to reconstruct the fixed part of the neourethra) is resected. The cranially pedicled U-shaped labia majora flaps are rotated 90 degrees medially to bring the neo-scrotum in front of the legs. Pedicled labia majora fat pads are released bilaterally and relocated in the neo-scrotum to achieve bulkiness. The meatus and vaginal orifice are diverted underneath the scrotum and a perineostomy is performed. RESULTS: We present our scrotoplasty technique as a step-by-step video guide. The technique results in the reconstruction of a perineostomy at the perineal scrotal transition, an augmented neo-scrotum, minimal visible scars, and proper neo-perineal length. CONCLUSION: Scrotal reconstruction using a horseshoe-shaped pedicled pubic flap, labia majora fat pads, and 2 cranially pedicled U-shaped labia majora flaps results in a neo-scrotum that resembles the biological scrotum closely in terms of bulkiness, size, shape, tactile sensation, and anatomical position.

Evaluation of the Decision Aid for Genital Surgery in Transmen.

BACKGROUND: Multiple options of genital gender-affirming surgery are available to transmen. The transman should be able to weigh these options based on the outcomes, risks, and consequences that are most important to him. For this reason, a decision aid for genital surgery in transmen (DA-GST) was developed. It aims to support the transman in making thoughtful choices among treatment options and facilitate shared decision-making between the healthcare professionals and the transindividual. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the newly developed DA-GST. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using mixed methods. Transmen considering to undergo genital surgery were eligible to partake in the study. The questionnaires used in this study were developed by adapting the validated Dutch translation of the "Decisional Conflict Scale," the "Measures of Informed Choice," and the "Ottawa Preparation for Decision-Making Scale." Qualitative interviews were conducted querying their subjective experience with the DA-GST. The data from the questionnaires were statistically analyzed, and the data from the interviews were thematically analyzed. OUTCOMES: The main outcome measures were decisional conflict and decisional confidence measured via self-report items and qualitative data regarding the use of the DA-GST via interviews. RESULTS: In total, 51 transmen participated in the questionnaires study, 99 questionnaires were analyzed, and 15 interviews were conducted. Although confident in their decision, most transmen felt responsible to collect the necessary information themselves. The ability to go through the decision aid independently aided the decision-making process by providing information and highlighting their subjective priorities. Suggested additions are pictures of postoperational outcomes and personal statements from experienced transmen. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: The DA-GST could be implemented as an integral part of transgender health care. Clinicians could take the individual personal values into account and use it to accurately tailor their consult. This would ultimately improve the doctor-patient relationship and decrease decisional regret by enhancing effective shared decision-making. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This mixed-method design study confirmed the use of the DA-GST while taking a broad range of decisional factors into account. Limitations include the absence of a baseline analysis and the limited power for the comparison of treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the DA-GST helped transmen feel more prepared for their personal consult with the surgeon, reduced decisional conflict, and increased their decisional confidence. Mokken SE, Özer M, van de Grift TC, et al. Evaluation of the Decision Aid for Genital Surgery in Transmen. J Sex Med 2020;17:2067-2076.

Prostate Cancer Incidence under Androgen Deprivation: Nationwide Cohort Study in Trans Women Receiving Hormone Treatment.

CONTEXT: Trans women (male sex assigned at birth, female gender identity) mostly use antiandrogens combined with estrogens and can subsequently undergo vaginoplasty including orchiectomy. Because the prostate remains in situ after this procedure, trans women are still at risk for prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of prostate cancer in trans women using hormone treatment. The incidence of prostate cancer in trans women using hormone treatment. DESIGN: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, data of participants were linked to the Dutch national pathology database and to Statistics Netherlands to obtain data on prostate cancer diagnosis and mortality. SETTING: Gender identity clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Trans women who visited our clinic between 1972 and 2016 and received hormone treatment were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated using the number of observed prostate cancer cases in our cohort and the number of expected cases based on age-specific incidence numbers from the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 2281 trans women with a median follow-up time of 14 years (interquartile range 7-24), and a total follow-up time of 37 117 years. Six prostate cancer cases were identified after a median 17 years of hormone treatment. This resulted in a lower prostate cancer risk in trans women than in Dutch reference males (SIR 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Trans women receiving androgen deprivation therapy and estrogens have a substantially lower risk for prostate cancer than the general male population. Our results support the hypothesis that androgen deprivation has a preventive effect on the initiation and development of prostate cancer.

The First Experience of Using the Pedicled Labia Minora Flap for Urethral Lengthening in Transgender Men Undergoing Anterolateral Thigh and Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap Phalloplasty: A Multicenter Study on Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the novel surgical technique of urethral lengthening in anterolateral thigh and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap phalloplasty with a pedicled labia minora flap (PLMF) and report on the clinical outcomes. METHODS: Between March 2014 and August 2018, 16 transgender men underwent phalloplasty with a PLMF for urethral lengthening at the Amsterdam UMC (VU university), the Netherlands and the Belgrade University Hospital, Serbia. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, neourethra characteristics, intra- and postoperative complications, pre-and postoperative voiding evaluation, and the length of hospital stay were retrospectively identified from chart reviews. RESULTS: The mean neourethral length was 16.8 ± 2.3 cm, and the pars pendulans 11.7 ± 2.2 cm. The neomeatus was localized on top of the neophallus in 12 (75%) patients. No intraoperative complications occurred. Urethral fistula formation occurred in 4 (25%) patients and strictures in 6 (37.5%) patients. In 3 (18.7%) patients a (temporary) perineostomy had to be performed. Voiding from a standing position was possible in 9 (56.3%) patients. CONCLUSION: The PLMF for urethral reconstruction, both pars fixa and pars pendulans, in phalloplasty is a feasible surgical technique in transgender men undergoing anterolateral thigh or superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap phalloplasty with sufficient labia minora tissue.

Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery in Transgender Men in The Netherlands from 1989 to 2018: The Evolution of Surgical Care.

BACKGROUND: The number of individuals with gender identity incongruence seeking treatment, including genital gender-affirming surgery, has increased over the past decade. Surgical techniques for genital gender-affirming surgery in transgender men have evolved considerably. The aim of this study was to present an overview of the evolution of genital gender-affirming surgery for transgender men in a single, high-volume center. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of all transgender men who underwent genital gender-affirming surgery from January of 1989 to January of 2018 at their institution. Subject demographics, type of surgery, and surgical techniques were recorded. RESULTS: Over time, four hundred transgender men underwent genital gender-affirming surgery. Metoidioplasty was performed in 222 patients (56 percent) and phalloplasty in 178 patients (44 percent). Before 2010, the majority of patients underwent metoidioplasty, whereas since 2010, phalloplasty has been performed in most patients. Of 400 patients, 332 (83 percent) underwent urethral lengthening. The option to undergo genital surgery without urethral lengthening was offered from 2004. Since then, 68 (34 percent) patients chose to undergo genital gender-affirming surgery without urethral lengthening. The choice of surgical options for genital gender-affirming surgery in transgender men has grown from five in 1989 to 12 techniques currently. The variety and combination of flaps used for phalloplasty has increased over time. Conversely, the use of some flaps has been abandoned, whereas other flaps have reemerged. CONCLUSIONS: Genital gender-affirming surgery has developed over time in line with reconstructive surgical innovations. Despite technical advancements, there is no one ideal technique, and every technique has specific advantages and disadvantages. With the increase in surgical options, shared decision-making and a shift from surgeon-centered toward more patient-centered care are required.

Effectiveness of Preoperative Depilation of the Urethral Donor Site for Phalloplasty: Neourethral Hair Growth and its Effects on Voiding.

BACKGROUND: For transgender men choosing to undergo phalloplasty with urethral lengthening, there is a potential for hair growth in the neourethra. Depilation of the urethral donor site may reduce subsequent intraurethral hair growth. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative laser depilation and assess the correlation between urethral hair density and voiding among transgender men undergoing phalloplasty with urethral lengthening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective study of 25 transgender men undergoing phalloplasty with urethral lengthening between July 2010 and April 2015 at the VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam. INTERVENTION: Phalloplasty with urethral lengthening using skin with or without preoperative depilation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data on preoperative laser depilation treatments were obtained from the local laser center. Intraurethral images were captured via urethroscopy and used to rate hair density. Images of the contralateral forearm were used as a reference. Hair density was rated in terms of the number of hairs per view as zero, low (1-9), moderate (10-19), or high (≥20). Voiding was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, a 24-h voiding diary, and uroflowmetry. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Twenty-five patients underwent urethroscopy. In the depilation group (n = 14) the hair reduction was significant and hair density was downgraded on average by 1.0 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-1.5). The mean number of laser treatment sessions was 6 (range 2-10). In the no-depilation group (n = 11), hair density did not significantly differ between the urethra and the contralateral arm (mean difference 0.18, 95% CI 0.5-0.9). The majority of the patients reported mild voiding complaints (median IPSS score 7, range 2-28) and had a normal functional bladder capacity and a nonobstructed urinary flow with low postvoid volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Laser epilation treatment reduces hair growth but does not eliminate hair. Voiding complaints do not seem to be related to hair density in the urethra. PATIENT SUMMARY: For skin donor sites used in penis construction for transgender men, the amount of hair growth is reduced by preoperative laser depilation, but hair is still present in the new urethra. Hair in the urethra does not cause urinary voiding complaints.

Surgical Experience and Outcomes of Implantation of the ZSI 100 FtM Malleable Penile Implant in Transgender Men After Phalloplasty.

INTRODUCTION: After free or pedicled flap phalloplasty, many transgender men need penile prosthesis implantation to successfully engage in penetrative sexual intercourse. Postoperative complications occur frequently. There is a choice between inflatable and malleable penile prostheses. Until recently, no prostheses were designed specifically for this population. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe our preliminary experience with, and surgical outcomes of, implantation of the ZSI 100 FtM Malleable Penile Implant after phalloplasty in transgender men. METHODS: A retrospective chart study was conducted on surgical characteristics and postoperative complications after implantation of the ZSI Malleable Penile Implant in transgender men in 3 European centers for genital transgender surgery in Amsterdam, Stockholm, and Reykjavik. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcomes measures were surgical outcome, complications, and reason of implant failure. RESULTS: 25 patients were retrospectively identified, with a mean age of 36 ± 9 years at implantation. The mean time between prosthesis implantation and phalloplasty was 3.6 ± 2.5 years. 10 patients previously underwent free radial forearm flap phalloplasty, 6 patients had anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty, 2 patients had superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator phalloplasty, 1 patient had groin flap phalloplasty, and 6 patients underwent combination flap phalloplasty. With a mean follow-up of 6.3 months, prosthesis explantation because of complications was performed in 8 patients (32%), because of infection (n = 3), protrusion (n = 4), or pubic pain (n = 1). In an additional 3 patients, the prosthesis was explanted due to difficulty living with the malleable prosthesis. Of those with the prosthesis in place, 13 of 14 patients (93%) were able to engage in penetrative sexual intercourse. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The current article provides advantages and disadvantages of this medical device. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: This is the first study on the ZSI Malleable Penile Implant prostheses in this patient group. It also provides information on the use of malleable prostheses; whereas current literature predominantly focusses on inflatable devices. Limitations comprise the small patient population, short follow-up time, and retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSION: Complication rates of the ZSI Malleable Penile Implant prosthesis seem high at the start of the learning curve. Although designed specifically for the transgender community, not all transgender patients will be eligible for this type of prosthesis. Patients need to be well counseled on specific (dis)advantages of the prosthesis. Pigot GLS, Sigurjónsson H, Ronkes B, et al. Surgical Experience and Outcomes of Implantation of the ZSI 100 FtM Malleable Penile Implant in Transgender Men After Phalloplasty. J Sex Med 2020;17:152-158.

Surgical Outcomes of Neoscrotal Augmentation with Testicular Prostheses in Transgender Men.

INTRODUCTION: Testicular prosthesis implantation may be used for neoscrotal augmentation in transgender men. AIM: Assess the clinical outcomes and risk factors for postoperative complications of this procedure in transgender men. METHODS: All transgender men who underwent neoscrotal augmentation with testicular implants between January 1992 and December 2018 were retrospectively identified. A retrospective chart study was performed that recorded surgical characteristics and postoperative complications. Risk factors on complications were identified using uni- and multivariate analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Surgical outcomes included explantation due to infection, extrusion, discomfort, or leakage. RESULTS: We identified 206 patients, and the following prostheses were placed: Dow Corning (n = 22), Eurosilicone (n = 2), Nagor (n = 205), Polytech (n = 10), Promedon (n = 105) , Prometel (n = 22), Sebbin (n = 44), and unknown (n = 2). The mean clinical follow-up time was 11.5 ± 8.3 years. In 43 patients (20.8%), one or both prostheses were explanted due to infection, extrusion, discomfort, prosthesis leakage, or urethral problems. Currently, scrotoplasty according to Hoebeke is the most frequently performed technique. Our review found that for this technique explantation occurred in 6 of 52 patients (11.5%). A history of smoking was a risk factor for postoperative infections and prosthesis explantation. In earlier years, larger prostheses were immediately placed at scrotal reconstruction; however, a trend can be seen toward smaller and lighter testicular prostheses and delayed implantation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients wanting to undergo this procedure can be adequately informed on postoperative outcomes. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include the number of patients, long clinical follow-up time, and completeness of data. Weaknesses of this study include its retrospective nature and the high variability of prostheses and surgical techniques used. CONCLUSION: Over the years, scrotoplasty techniques and testicular prostheses preferences have changed. Explantation rates have dropped over the last decade. Pigot GLS, Al-Tamimi M, Ronkes B, et al. Surgical Outcomes of Neoscrotal Augmentation with Testicular Prostheses in Transgender Men. J Sex Med 2019;16:1664-1671.

The Surgical Techniques and Outcomes of Secondary Phalloplasty After Metoidioplasty in Transgender Men: An International, Multi-Center Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Some transgender men express the wish to undergo genital gender-affirming surgery. Metoidioplasty and phalloplasty are procedures that are performed to construct a neophallus. Genital gender-affirming surgery contributes to physical well-being, but dissatisfaction with the surgical results may occur. Disadvantages of metoidioplasty are the relatively small neophallus, the inability to have penetrative sex, and often difficulty with voiding while standing. Therefore, some transgender men opt to undergo a secondary phalloplasty after metoidioplasty. Literature on secondary phalloplasty is scarce. AIM: Explore the reasons for secondary phalloplasty, describe the surgical techniques, and report on the clinical outcomes. METHODS: Transgender men who underwent secondary phalloplasty after metoidioplasty were retrospectively identified in 8 gender surgery clinics (Amsterdam, Belgrade, Bordeaux, Austin, Ghent, Helsinki, Miami, and Montreal). Preoperative consultation, patient motivation for secondary phalloplasty, surgical technique, perioperative characteristics, complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measures were surgical techniques, patient motivation, and outcomes of secondary phalloplasty after metoidioplasty in transgender men. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were identified. The median follow-up was 7.5 years (range 0.8-39). Indicated reasons to undergo secondary phalloplasty were to have a larger phallus (n = 32; 38.6%), to be able to have penetrative sexual intercourse (n = 25; 30.1%), have had metoidioplasty performed as a first step toward phalloplasty (n = 17; 20.5%), and to void while standing (n = 15; 18.1%). Each center had preferential techniques for phalloplasty. A wide variety of surgical techniques were used to perform secondary phalloplasty. Intraoperative complications (revision of microvascular anastomosis) occurred in 3 patients (5.5%) undergoing free flap phalloplasty. Total flap failure occurred in 1 patient (1.2%). Urethral fistulas occurred in 23 patients (30.3%) and strictures in 27 patients (35.6%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A secondary phalloplasty is a suitable option for patients who previously underwent metoidioplasty. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This is the first study to report on secondary phalloplasty in collaboration with 8 specialized gender clinics. The main limitation was the retrospective design. CONCLUSION: In high-volume centers specialized in gender affirming surgery, a secondary phalloplasty in transgender men can be performed after metoidioplasty with complication rates similar to primary phalloplasty. Al-Tamimi M, Pigot GL, van der Sluis WB, et al. The Surgical Techniques and Outcomes of Secondary Phalloplasty After Metoidioplasty in Transgender Men: An International, Multi-Center Case Series. J Sex Med 2019;16:1849-1859.

A Retrospective Cohort Study on Surgical Outcomes of Penile Prosthesis Implantation Surgery in Transgender Men After Phalloplasty.

OBJECTIVES: To assess surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation in transgender men who underwent phalloplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Transgender men who underwent penile prosthesis implantation after phalloplasty between January 1989 and September 2018 were retrospectively identified. A chart study was performed recording patient demographics, perioperative complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were identified: 22 underwent free radial forearm flap, 5 anterolateral thigh, 4 anterolateral thigh/free radial forearm flap, and 1 fibular flap phalloplasty. The median age at prosthesis implantation was 36 (range 21-59) years, the mean BMI 25.9 ± 4.0 kg/m2. At first implantation, 16 inflatable (AMS Dynaflex (n = 13), AMS Ambicor (n = 3)) and 16 malleable (Coloplast genesis (n = 14), AMS Spectra (n = 2)) prostheses were placed. Of these, 5 (16%) were removed/replaced because of infection, 2 (6%) because of leakage, 2 because of extrusion, 2 because of dislocation, 2 because of dysfunction, and 1 (3%) because of pain. The postoperative course was completely uneventful in 10 (31.3%) patients. Of all implanted prostheses, including revision procedures (n = 45), 21 (44%) were surgically replaced or removed. CONCLUSION: Prosthesis explantation, replacement, or revision surgery occurs frequently after penile prosthesis implantation. Patients need to be well-informed preoperatively on these complication rates.