Usefulness of molecular diagnosis in egg allergic children.

INTRODUCTION: Egg allergy is one of the most common food allergies in children. Egg white, including ovomucoid (OVM or Gal d 1) and ovalbumin (OVA or Gal d 2), is the major source of allergens. The aim of this study was to assess the role of Gal d 1 and Gal d 2 in predicting the risk of anaphylaxis caused by eggs in children, and to compare this new diagnostic tool with established methods of allergen-specific IgE detection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight children were divided into 2 groups according to a positive (group A, 33 children) or negative (group B, 115 children) history of anaphylaxis after ingestion/contact with eggs. All patients underwent an allergological evaluation by measurements of specific IgE against egg white: Gal d 1 and Gal d 2. RESULTS: Higher levels of Gal d 1, Gal d 2 and IgE against egg white were detected in group A compared to group B (p < 0.001). Although the area under the curve was similar for Gal d 1 and Gal d 2, egg white specific IgE showed a better sensitivity (85%) for a cut-off value ≥ 0.975 kUA/l, while Gal d 1 and Gal d 2 demonstrated a better specificity (90% and 80%, respectively) for cut-off values ≥ 1.460 kUA/l and ≥ 2.310 kUA/l, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Egg white specific IgE showed a similar ability as Gal d 1 and Gal d 2 in differentiating children at risk for egg anaphylaxis, although Gal d 1 and Gal d 2 showed a better specificity.

Relationship between exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) and asthma control test (ACT) in asthmatic children.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship between Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) and exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) in 81 asthmatic children. METHODS: EIB was assessed in every patient by Balke protocol and asthma control was evaluated by ACT. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A (30 patients) with complete asthma control (ACT score = 25), Group B (37 patients) with partial asthma control (ACT score = 21-24), and Group C (14 patients) with poor asthma control (ACT score < 20). RESULTS: About 36% (11/30) of patients in Group A (with complete asthma control) tested positive for EIB, whereas 21% (8/37) in Group B (with partial asthma control) and 28% (4/14) in Group C (with poor asthma control) exhibited EIB. The percentage of positive EIB was very similar between the three groups with no differences between controlled, partially controlled, and uncontrolled asthma. Statistical evaluation by χ(2)-test between complete (ACT score = 25) and not complete asthma control (ACT score < 24) confirmed a statistically significant difference (p < .01) between the obtained data. CONCLUSIONS: It must be stated that ACT alone is not sufficient to evaluate asthma control in children correctly because it fails to detect EIB in a significant percentage of subjects.