Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin J Pain ; 31(3): 214-21, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654429

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A survey of breakthrough pain (BTP) was performed in five palliative care units (PCU), seven oncology departments (ONC), and nine pain clinics (OPC). METHODS: A standard algorithm was used to confirm the diagnosis of BTP of patients refereed to different settings. RESULTS: 1,412 evaluable cancer patients were enrolled. 53.9% were males and the mean age was 63.7±13.1 years. The mean intensity of background pain was 2.8±0.73. Patients reported 2.4±1.1 BTP episodes/day with a mean intensity of 7.37±1.28. 80.6% patients reported that the BTP had a significant negative impact in everyday life. The majority of patients reported a fast onset of BTP, which was predictable in 50.7% of cases, while BTP with a gradual onset (>10 min) was less predictable (29%) (P=0.001). PCU patients were older, had lower Karnofsky levels, a lower number of BTP episodes/day, a slow onset of BTP onset, and a less predictable BTP. Cancer diagnosis was performed a mean of 23.5 months (SD±32.8) before the assessment. The mean duration of background pain was 3.5 months (SD±3.5), and the mean duration of any analgesic treatment was 2.5 months (SD±3). BTP started a mean of 2.2 months (SD±1.9) before the assessment. Characteristics of BTP were influenced by the course of disease, as well as the duration of background pain and initiation of BTP. Most patients took rapid onset opioids and were satisfied with the treatment. BTP diagnosis was prevalently made by ONC and OPC physicians, and rarely by GPs. CONCLUSION: This survey performed by an Italian observatory expert review group, has confirmed that the BTP represents a clinically relevant condition with a negative impact on the patient's quality of life. BTP was detected in all settings involved. A number of factors are associated with the BTP. Also factors regarding the course of disease and setting of care have been assessed. This information may help in stratifying patients or predicting the risk of development of BTP with specific characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Irruptivo/epidemiología , Dolor Irruptivo/etiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Dimensión del Dolor , Anciano , Dolor Irruptivo/terapia , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Clínicas de Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Recenti Prog Med ; 98(4): 225-31, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17547359

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Vertebral fractures are the most common consequences of severe osteoporosis. The chronic pain from collapse of osteoporotic vertebrae affects quality of life and autonomy of patients. The management of pain with oral or transdermal opiates can cause severe side-effects. Continuous intrathecal administration of morphine with an implantable pump represents a good alternative therapy and has advantages in pain relief and quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report our experience in the treatment of refractory chronic pain due to vertebral fractures using pumps for intrathecal infusion of morphine in 24 patients. We administered the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation of Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). RESULTS: A significant pain relief was obtained in all implanted patients. Using the QUALEFFO we observed significant improvements of all variables such as QDL (quality of life), DW (domestic work), ambulation and PHS (perception of health status), before and after 1 year from pump implantation. With intrathecal morphine infusion none of the patients required additional systemic analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that intrathecal administration of morphine efficiently relieves the symptoms of pain and improve the quality of life. Continuous intrathecal administration of morphine represents a good alternative therapy and has advantages in those patients who suffer from severe side-effects with systemic administration.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Inyecciones Espinales/métodos , Masculino , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor , Calidad de Vida , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...