Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431252

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is classified according to neurophysiological and histological findings, the inheritance pattern, and the underlying genetic defect. The objective of these guidelines is to offer recommendations for the diagnosis, prognosis, follow-up, and treatment of this disease in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: These consensus guidelines were developed through collaboration by a multidisciplinary panel encompassing a broad group of experts on the subject, including neurologists, paediatric neurologists, geneticists, physiatrists, and orthopaedic surgeons. RECOMMENDATIONS: The diagnosis of CMT is clinical, with patients usually presenting a common or classical phenotype. Clinical assessment should be followed by an appropriate neurophysiological study; specific recommendations are established for the parameters that should be included. Genetic diagnosis should be approached sequentially; once PMP22 duplication has been ruled out, if appropriate, a next-generation sequencing study should be considered, taking into account the limitations of the available techniques. To date, no pharmacological disease-modifying treatment is available, but symptomatic management, guided by a multidiciplinary team, is important, as is proper rehabilitation and orthopaedic management. The latter should be initiated early to identify and improve the patient's functional deficits, and should include individualised exercise guidelines, orthotic adaptation, and assessment of conservative surgeries such as tendon transfer. The follow-up of patients with CMT is exclusively clinical, and ancillary testing is not necessary in routine clinical practice.

2.
Rev. esp. cir. ortop. traumatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 59(2): 122-128, mar.-abr. 2015. ilus, tab, graf
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-133875

RESUMEN

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es comparar la biocompatibilidad y efecto sobre osteoblastos de polimetilmetacrilato solo y PMMA al que se ha añadido, hidroxiapatita en concentraciones del 5, 10, 15 y 20%, no superando nunca esta cifra del 20%, dado que si se supera esta cifra pueden verse alteradas las propiedades biomecánicas del PMMA. Material y métodos: Estudio experimental que consiste en el estudio de la adhesividad, diferenciación y muerte celular sobre discos de PMMA y composite PMMA/HA a diferentes concentraciones. Resultados: Los composites al 15 y especialmente al 20% presentaron mejor respuesta osteoblástica, mayores marcadores de actividad y menores marcadores de apoptosis. En las imágenes de microcopía electrónica se aprecia una mayor adhesión celular (AU)


Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the biocompatibility and the effect in osteoblasts of polymethyl methacrylate alone, and mixed with hydroxyapatite in different concentrations of 5, 10, 15 and 20%, without exceeding 20%, as it can alter mechanical properties of the composite. Material and methods: Experimental study comparing osteoblast response to Polymethyl methacrylate alone and with hydroxyapatite in different concentrations. Results: Composites at 15 and 20% obtained better osteoblast response, with higher osteoblastic activity markers, and lower apoptosis markers. Electron microscopy images show improved adhesion of osteoblasts (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Osteoblastos/fisiología , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Oseointegración/fisiología , Adhesividad , Hidroxiapatitas/análisis , Polimetil Metacrilato/análisis , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol ; 59(2): 122-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25312256

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the biocompatibility and the effect in osteoblasts of polymethyl methacrylate alone, and mixed with hydroxyapatite in different concentrations of 5, 10, 15 and 20%, without exceeding 20%, as it can alter mechanical properties of the composite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experimental study comparing osteoblast response to Polymethyl methacrylate alone and with hydroxyapatite in different concentrations. RESULTS: Composites at 15 and 20% obtained better osteoblast response, with higher osteoblastic activity markers, and lower apoptosis markers. Electron microscopy images show improved adhesion of osteoblasts.


Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles/farmacología , Cementos para Huesos/farmacología , Durapatita/farmacología , Osteoblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Polimetil Metacrilato/farmacología , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Adhesión Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/instrumentación , Osteoblastos/fisiología , Columna Vertebral/cirugía
4.
Rev. esp. cir. ortop. traumatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 57(6): 446-449, nov.-dic. 2013. ilus
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-116872

RESUMEN

Las luxaciones cervicales inveteradas presentan serias dificultades a la hora de plantear su tratamiento adecuado, por un lado, debido la dificultad de su reducción y, por otro, al riesgo de inducir lesiones iatrogénicas durante su reducción. A este hecho hay que añadir la escasa y controvertida bibliografía existente a la hora de establecer la estrategia quirúrgica más apropiada para su manejo. Presentamos un caso clínico tratado en la Unidad de Raquis del Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología del Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, discutiendo las 2 opciones de tratamiento que actualmente se consideran las más utilizadas: el abordaje anterior-posterior-anterior y el posterior-anterior-posterior. Tras el análisis de los datos obtenidos de la revisión de este caso, podríamos concluir que el abordaje quirúrgico de estas lesiones resulta en general difícil, pudiéndose realizar las 2 técnicas anteriormente descritas, pero con la precaución de extirpar siempre la totalidad del disco intervertebral afectado antes de realizar las maniobras de corrección axial, por el riesgo de extrusión del mismo hacia canal medular. Con posterioridad a este gesto quirúrgico, se procedería a una correcta liberación y reducción de las facetas articulares, siendo necesario, en ocasiones, añadir osteotomías en las mismas (AU)


It is difficult to decide the appropriate treatment for inveterate cervical dislocations because of the difficulty of their reduction, as well as due to the risk of inducing iatrogenic injuries during this reduction. The literature on the most appropriate surgical strategy for their management is also limited as well as controversial.We report one clinical case treated in the Spine Unit of the Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma Service of the University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, discussing the currently most used treatment options, the anterior-posterior-anterior and the posterior-anterior-posterior approach. After analyzing the results, it could be concluded that the surgical approach to these lesions is generally difficult, with any of two techniques described above being suitable, but always with the precaution to remove the entire affected intervertebral disc before axial correction maneuvers, thus avoiding the risk of extrusion into the medullary canal. After the surgical procedure, a proper release and reduction of the joint facets should be performed, sometimes with the need to add osteotomies in them (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Luxaciones Articulares/terapia , Luxaciones Articulares , Osteotomía/instrumentación , Osteotomía/métodos , Plexo Cervical/lesiones , Plexo Cervical/cirugía , Plexo Cervical , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Vértebras Cervicales , Artrodesis/métodos , Artrodesis/tendencias , Osteotomía , Artrodesis , Traumatismos Vertebrales/fisiopatología , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Traumatismos Vertebrales/cirugía , Columna Vertebral
5.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol ; 57(6): 446-9, 2013.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24126148

RESUMEN

It is difficult to decide the appropriate treatment for inveterate cervical dislocations because of the difficulty of their reduction, as well as due to the risk of inducing iatrogenic injuries during this reduction. The literature on the most appropriate surgical strategy for their management is also limited as well as controversial. We report one clinical case treated in the Spine Unit of the Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma Service of the University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, discussing the currently most used treatment options, the anterior-posterior-anterior and the posterior-anterior-posterior approach. After analyzing the results, it could be concluded that the surgical approach to these lesions is generally difficult, with any of two techniques described above being suitable, but always with the precaution to remove the entire affected intervertebral disc before axial correction maneuvers, thus avoiding the risk of extrusion into the medullary canal. After the surgical procedure, a proper release and reduction of the joint facets should be performed, sometimes with the need to add osteotomies in them.


Asunto(s)
Vértebra Cervical Axis/lesiones , Vértebra Cervical Axis/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...