RESUMEN
The optimal initial graft tension during ACL reconstruction is still a matter of debate. Manual tension is commonly applied to the graft during tibial fixation. However, this has been associated with a greater graft failure rate than that associated with device-assisted tensioning. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes between the application of manual tension and the use of the ConMed Linvatec SE™ Graft Tensioning System during graft fixation while performing anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was conducted between September 2015 and May 2017. Sixty-four patients (mean age 29.3 years, range 14-45) with isolated ACL injuries (and who would be subjected to ACL reconstruction with a quadruple hamstring tendon graft) were divided into two groups. In Group A (n = 29), common tension was applied manually to both grafts. In Group B (n = 35), specific tension was applied to the grafts with the use of a tensioner device (ConMed Linvatec SE™ (Stress Equalization) Graft Tensioning System). A total of 60 N was applied to the semitendinosus, and 40 N was applied to the gracilis. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the baseline demographic and clinical data among the patients of the two groups (all p > 0.05). The patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months (mean ± SD). There were no significant differences in the side-to-side anterior knee laxity, the IKDC, the Lysholm Knee, and the Tegner Activity Scale scores for up to 24 months after operation. The pivot shift test was negative in all cases, and no graft failure was reported at a 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found with respect to postoperative anterior knee laxity, clinical outcomes, activity level, and patient satisfaction between the application of manual tension and the use of the graft-tensioning system during tibial fixation while performing anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with a quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Further high-quality clinical studies are required to elucidate whether device-assisted tension is superior to manual tension.
RESUMEN
Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is regarded as a minimally invasive surgery with low morbidity but complications still occur. Reports of neurovascular injuries related to graft harvesting, tunnel placement, or graft fixation are limited. A rare case of peroneal nerve injury related to hardware used for graft fixation in the tibial in a 28-year-old female patient who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery using a patellar tendon graft (bone-tendon-bone graft) is presented. Post-operatively, the patient presented with clinical signs of peroneal nerve damage and a reduced range of motion of the knee. Plain radiographs of the knee showed the bicortical screw which used for tibial fixation of the graft, penetrating the fibula and projecting beyond the lateral cortex of the fibular neck. The patient was treated with removal of the hardware and the graft. Intensive physiotherapy resulted in gradual improvement and at 6 months after the second operation the patient regained full range of motion of the knee and almost full muscle strength performing her daily activities without any difficulty and she is at the moment unwilling to undergo further procedure.
