Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 67(2): 592-603, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549792

RESUMEN

Influenza A viruses of H5 and H7 subtype in poultry can circulate subclinically and subsequently mutate from low to high pathogenicity with potentially devastating economic and welfare consequences. European Union Member States undertake surveillance of commercial and backyard poultry for early detection and control of subclinical H5 and H7 influenza A infection. This surveillance has moved towards a risk-based sampling approach in recent years; however, quantitative measures of relative risk associated with risk factors utilized in this approach are necessary for optimization. This study describes serosurveillance for H5 and H7 influenza A in domestic and commercial poultry undertaken in the European Union from 2004 to 2010, where a random sampling and thus representative approach to serosurveillance was undertaken. Using these representative data, this study measured relative risk of seropositivity across poultry categories and spatially across the EU. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Domestic waterfowl, game birds, fattening turkeys, ratites, backyard poultry and the 'other' poultry category holdings had relatively increased probability of H5 and/or H7 influenza A seropositivity, compared to laying-hen holdings. Amongst laying-hen holdings, free-range rearing was associated with increased probability of H7 seropositivity. Spatial analyses detected 'hotspots' for H5 influenza A seropositivity in western France and England, and H7 influenza A seropositivity in Italy and Belgium, which may be explained by the demographics and distribution of poultry categories. Findings suggest certain poultry category holdings are at increased risk of subclinical H5 and/or H7 influenza A circulation, and free-range rearing increases the likelihood of exposure to H7 influenza A. These findings may be used in further refining risk-based surveillance strategies and prioritizing management strategies in influenza A outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Pollos/virología , Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Gripe Aviar/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Pavos/virología , Animales , Estudios Transversales , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Unión Europea , Femenino , Virus de la Influenza A/patogenicidad , Gripe Aviar/virología , Modelos Logísticos , Aves de Corral , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/virología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
2.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 3(1): 1-14, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19453436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infections of wild birds with highly pathogenic avian influenza (AI) subtype H5N1 virus were reported for the first time in the European Union in 2006. OBJECTIVES: To capture epidemiological information on H5N1 HPAI in wild bird populations through large-scale surveillance and extensive data collection. METHODS: Records were analysed at bird level to explore the epidemiology of AI with regard to species of wild birds involved, timing and location of infections as well as the applicability of different surveillance types for the detection of infections. RESULTS: In total, 120,706 records of birds were sent to the Community Reference Laboratory for analysis. Incidents of H5N1 HPAI in wild birds were detected in 14 EU Member States during 2006. All of these incidents occurred between February and May, with the exception of two single cases during the summer months in Germany and Spain. CONCLUSIONS: For the detection of H5N1 HPAI virus, passive surveillance of dead or diseased birds appeared the most effective approach, whilst active surveillance offered better detection of low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses. No carrier species for H5N1 HPAI virus could be identified and almost all birds infected with H5N1 HPAI virus were either dead or showed clinical signs. A very large number of Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) were tested in 2006 and while a high proportion of LPAI infections were found in this species, H5N1 HPAI virus was rarely identified in these birds. Orders of species that appeared to be very clinically susceptible to H5N1 HPAI virus were swans, diving ducks, mergansers and grebes, supporting experimental evidence. Surveillance results indicate that H5N1 HPAI virus did not establish itself successfully in the EU wild bird population in 2006.


Asunto(s)
Unión Europea , Subtipo H5N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Aviar/epidemiología , Gripe Aviar/virología , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Aves , Geografía , Incidencia , Estaciones del Año , Vigilancia de Guardia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...