Understanding disposition after referral for bariatric surgery: when and why patients referred do not undergo surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is an effective long-term solution for weight loss in the severely obese. Prevalence of bariatric surgery has increased over the recent years; however, the attrition rate of those referred who actually undergo surgery is high. The purpose of this study was to examine patients' attrition rates after referral for bariatric surgery at an academic tertiary care institution. When and why patients who were referred for bariatric surgery did not ultimately undergo surgical treatment was examined. METHODS: Charts of 1,237 patients referred to the Toronto Western Hospital Bariatric Program from program inception to February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, appointment dates, no shows and cancellations, and when and why patients did not undergo surgery were summarized. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 47. Most patients were female, and the mean body mass index was 47. Half (50.6 %) of the total persons referred left the program prior to being seen by a health-care professional, and only 36.2 % underwent surgical treatment. Only 2.75 % of persons were ineligible for surgery. A total of 60.6 % of persons self-removed from our program. Reasons for self-removal varied, with the most common reason for leaving the program recorded as "unknown." CONCLUSIONS: Our multidisciplinary program with in-hospital psychosocial resources resulted in very few persons being excluded from receiving surgical treatment. However, less than half of those referred underwent surgery as most persons self-removed from our program for unknown reasons. Further investigation is required to determine which patient, administrative, and system factors play a role in the patients' decision to not undergo bariatric surgical treatment.

Monitoring gender equity in health using gender-sensitive indicators: a cross-national study.

BACKGROUND: As gender is known to be a major determinant of health, monitoring gender equity in health systems remains a vital public health priority. Focusing on a low-income (Peru), middle-income (Colombia), and high-income (Canada) country in the Americas, this study aimed to (1) identify and select gender-sensitive health indicators and (2) assess the feasibility of measuring and comparing gender-sensitive health indicators among countries. METHODS: Gender-sensitive health indicators were selected by a multidisciplinary group of experts from each country. The most recent gender-sensitive health measures corresponding to selected indicators were identified through electronic databases (CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, LIPECS, Latindex, and BIREME) and expert consultation. Data from population-based studies were analyzed when indicator information was unavailable from reports. RESULTS: Twelve of the 17 selected gender-sensitive health indicators were feasible to measure in at least two countries, and 9 of these were comparable among all countries. Indicators that were available were not stratified or adjusted by age, education, marital status, or wealth. The largest between-country difference was maternal mortality, and the largest gender inequity was mortality from homicides. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that gender inequities in health exist in all countries, regardless of income level. Economic development seemed to confer advantages in the availability of such indicators; however, this finding was not consistent and needs to be further explored. Future initiatives should include identifying health system factors and risk factors associated with disparities as well as assessing the cost-effectiveness of including the routine monitoring of gender inequities in health.