Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for the diagnosis of delirium in adults in critical care settings.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is an underdiagnosed clinical syndrome typified by an acute alteration of mental state. It is an important problem in critical care and intensive care units (ICU) due to its high prevalence and its association with adverse outcomes. Delirium is a very distressing condition for patients, with a huge impact on their well-being. Diagnosis of delirium in the critical care setting is challenging. This is especially true for patients who are mechanically ventilated and are therefore unable to engage in a verbal interview. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) is a tool specifically designed to assess for delirium in the context of ICU patients, including those on mechanical ventilation. CAM-ICU can be administered by non-specialists to give a dichotomous delirium present/absent result. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CAM-ICU for the diagnosis of delirium in adult patients in critical care units. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid SP, 1946 to 8 July 2022), Embase (Ovid SP, 1982 to 8 July 2022), Web of Science Core Collection (ISI Web of Knowledge, 1945 to 8 July 2022), PsycINFO (Ovid SP, 1806 to 8 July 2022), and LILACS (BIREME, 1982 to 8 July 2022). We checked the reference lists of included studies and other resources for additional potentially relevant studies. We also searched the Health Technology Assessment database, the Cochrane Library, Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility database, WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and websites of scientific associations to access any annual meetings and abstracts of conference proceedings in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included diagnostic studies enrolling adult ICU patients assessed using the CAM-ICU tool, regardless of language or publication status and reporting sufficient data on delirium diagnosis for the construction of 2 x 2 tables. Eligible studies evaluated the diagnostic performance of the CAM-ICU versus a clinical reference standard based on any iteration of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria applied by a clinical expert. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected and collated study data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We used two univariate fixed-effect or random-effects models to determine summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity. We performed sensitivity analyses that excluded studies considered to be at high risk of bias and high concerns in applicability, due mainly to the target population included (e.g. patients with traumatic brain injury). We also investigated potential sources of heterogeneity, assessing the effect of reference standard diagnosis and proportion of patients ventilated. MAIN RESULTS: We included 25 studies (2817 participants). The mean age of participants ranged from 48 to 69 years; 15 of the studies included critical care units admitting mixed populations (e.g. medical, trauma, surgery patients). The percentage of patients receiving mechanical ventilation ranged from 11.8% to 100%. The prevalence of delirium in the studies included ranged from 12.5% to 83.9%. Presence of delirium was determined by the application of DSM-IV criteria in 13 out of 25 included studies. We assessed 13 studies as at low risk of bias and low applicability concerns for all QUADAS-2 domains. The most common issue of concern was flow and timing of the tests, followed by patient selection. Overall, we estimated a pooled sensitivity of 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.83) and a pooled specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97). Sensitivity analysis restricted to studies at low risk of bias and without any applicability concerns (n = 13 studies) gave similar summary accuracy indices (sensitivity 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.86), specificity 0.95 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.97)). Subgroup analyses based on diagnostic assessment found summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for studies using DSM-IV of 0.79 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.85) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96). For studies that used DSM-5 criteria, summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.82) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99). DSM criteria had no significant effect on sensitivity (P = 0.421), but the specificity for detection of delirium was higher when DSM-5 criteria were used (P = 0.024). The relative specificity comparing DSM-5 versus DSM-IV criteria was 1.05 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.08). Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for studies recruiting < 100% of patients with mechanical ventilation were 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.85) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98). For studies that exclusively recruited patients with mechanical ventilation, summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.99). Although there was a suggestion of differential performance of CAM-ICU in ventilated patients, the differences were not significant in sensitivity (P = 0.316) or in specificity (P = 0.493). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The CAM-ICU tool may have a role in the early identification of delirium, in adult patients hospitalized in intensive care units, including those on mechanical ventilation, when non-specialized, properly trained clinical personnel apply the CAM-ICU. The test is most useful for exclusion of delirium. The test may miss a proportion of patients with incident delirium, therefore in situations where detection of all delirium cases is desirable, it may be best to repeat the test or combine CAM-ICU with another assessment. Future studies should compare different screening tests proposed for bedside assessment of delirium, as this approach will reveal which tool yields superior accuracy. In addition, future studies should consider and report the flow and timing of the tests and clearly report key characteristics related to patient selection. Finally, future research should focus on the impact of CAM-ICU screening on patient outcomes.

Left Ventricular Dysfunction Persists in the First Week after Re-Warming following Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hypoxic-Ischaemic Encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess serial myocardial function in newborn infants receiving therapeutic hypothermia (TH) as treatment for moderate to severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). METHODS: Serial echocardiography was performed in 20 term infants receiving TH on days 1-3 and again after re-warming. Left ventricular (LV) fractional shortening, LV cardiac output, and tissue Doppler imaging-derived myocardial velocities and myocardial performance index were measured. Similar assessments were obtained from 20 well term infants within 48 h of birth. RESULTS: LV fractional shortening (LVFS) was similar between cases and controls during all measurements (25.3% vs. 27.4%). The mean LV cardiac output on day 1 was significantly lower in cases (109 mL/kg/min) than in controls (162 mL/kg/min) but increased after re-warming (145 mL/kg/min). All myocardial velocities were significantly lower in cases on day 1, increased during TH, but LV indices remained consistently lower compared to controls even after re-warming. LV myocardial performance index was higher in cases compared to controls on day 1, improved during TH but remained abnormal after re-warming. The right ventricular myocardial performance index was similar between cases and controls. CONCLUSION: Among infants affected by moderate to severe HIE, LV function appears to be more affected than right ventricular function with LV dysfunction persisting after completion of TH. LVFS was not useful to determine dysfunction in this cohort.

New measures improved the reporting of heterogeneity in diagnostic test accuracy reviews: a metaepidemiological study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the methods used to quantify heterogeneity and to propose alternative measures to improve reporting of heterogeneity in Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Our metaepidemiological study included all DTA reviews in the Cochrane Library up to October 6th, 2019. We summarized reviews' characteristics focusing on heterogeneity analysis. We selected reviews with a bivariate model and ≥4 studies for reanalysis. In this group, we fitted bivariate random effects models and we quantified heterogeneity by means of logit variances of sensitivity and specificity, bivariate I2, median odds ratio (OR), and the area of the 95% prediction ellipse. We provided a narrative interpretation of these measures in different scenarios. RESULTS: There were 124 Cochrane DTA reviews of which 91 (73%) included meta-analysis. Only in 5 meta-analyses, variances of the logit sensitivity and specificity were reported, and in 21 meta-analyses (23%), the 95% prediction ellipse was reported without any calculation of its area. We selected 60 of these 91 reviews to explore the behavior of all measures of heterogeneity. We found that most reviews described the subjective heterogeneity as moderate or extreme (n = 31/60, 52%), whereas the area of the 95% prediction ellipse and the median OR for sensitivity and specificity showed high variability; the area ranged from 5% to 97%, the median OR of sensitivity ranged from 1.13 to 10.7, and the median OROR of specificity ranged from 1.18 to 19.68. CONCLUSION: Cochrane DTA reviews show a poor reporting of between-study heterogeneity. Using median OR and the area of the 95% prediction ellipse will improve reporting and interpretation of this crucial aspect of DTA meta-analysis.

Opinión de los especialistas de medicina preventiva y salud pública acerca de las recomendaciones sobre las prácticas de bajo valor: encuesta piloto / Preventive medicine and public health specialists' opinion about recommendations of low-value practices: a pilot survey

No disponible

Female under-representation in sepsis studies: a bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess female representation in primary studies underpinning recommendations from clinical guidelines and systematic reviews for sepsis treatment in adults. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a bibliometric study. We removed studies pertaining to sex-specific diseases and included quasirandomized, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and observational studies. We analyzed the female participation-to-prevalence ratio (PPR). RESULTS: We included 277 studies published between 1973 and 2017. For the 246 studies for which sex data were available, the share of female participation was 40%. Females overall were under-represented relative to their share of the sepsis population (PPR 0.78). Disaggregated results were reported by sex in 57 studies. In univariate analyses, non-intensive care unit setting and consideration of other social health determinants were significantly associated with greater female participation (P < 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively). In regression models, studies published in 1996 or later were likely to report sex, while RCTs were unlikely to do so (P = 0.019 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study points to female underenrollment in sepsis studies. Primary studies underpinning recommendations for sepsis have poorly reported their findings by sex.

Reporting quality of survival analyses in medical journals still needs improvement. A minimal requirements proposal.

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed publications with two main objectives: to describe how survival analyses are reported across medical journal specialties and to evaluate changes in reporting across periods and journal specialties. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of clinical research articles published in 1991 and 2007, in 13 high-impact medical journals. RESULTS: The number of articles performing survival analysis published in 1991 (104) and 2007 (240) doubled (17% vs. 33.5%; P = 0.000), although not uniformly across specialties. The percentage of studies using regression models and the number of patients included also increased. The presentation of results improved, although only the reporting of precision of effect estimates reached satisfactory levels (53.1% in 1991 vs. 94.2% in 2007; P = 0.000). Quality of reporting also varied across specialties; for example, cardiology articles were less likely than oncology ones to discuss sample size estimation (odds ratio = 0.12; 95% confidence interval: 0.05, 0.30). We also detected an interaction effect between period and specialty regarding the likelihood of reporting precision of curves and precision of effect estimates. CONCLUSION: The application of survival analysis to medical research data is increasing, whereas improvement in reporting quality is slow. We propose a list of minimum requirements for improved application and description of survival analysis.

Utility of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody measurement in identifying patients with dermatomyositis and a high risk for developing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease: a review of the literature and a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) antibody measurement for predicting a risk for developing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM). METHODS: A single-center cohort of 64 consecutive Chinese patients with PM/DM was examined. Serum anti-MDA5 antibody was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. For meta-analysis, we searched PubMed and the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge for original studies that measured anti-MDA5 antibodies in patients with PM/DM. We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve. RESULTS: In Chinese patients, anti-MDA5 antibodies were detected in 26 patients with classic DM or clinically amyopathic DM (CADM). Compared with anti-MDA5-negative patients, anti-MDA5-positive patients showed a higher prevalence of RP-ILD (P = 0.001). In a total of 233 patients with anti-MDA5 antibody, derived from 16 studies, a higher frequency of CADM was found in Japanese than in non-Japanese patients (74.7% versus 39.2%; P = 1.2 × 10(-7) ). Meta-analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti-MDA5 antibody for RP-ILD was 77% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 64-87%) and 86% (95% CI 79-90%), respectively. The pooled DOR was 20.41 (95% CI 9.02-46.20) with a favorable area under the sROC curve of 0.89 (95% CI 0.63-0.98). CONCLUSION: Detection of anti-MDA5 antibody is a valuable tool for identifying DM patients with a high risk for developing RP-ILD, but the distribution of classic DM and CADM in patients with this antibody varies among ethnic groups.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting additional lesions and contralateral cancer not identified using conventional imaging in primary breast cancer. METHODS: We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to estimate diagnostic accuracy indices and the impact of MRI on surgical management. RESULTS: Fifty articles were included (n = 10,811 women). MRI detected additional disease in 20% of women and in the contralateral breast in 5.5%. The summary PPV of ipsilateral additional disease was 67% (95% CI 59-74%). For contralateral breast, the PPV was 37% (95% CI 27-47%). For ipsilateral lesions, MRI devices ≥1.5 Tesla (T) had higher PPV (75%, 95% CI 64-83%) than MRI with <1.5 T (59%, 95% CI 53-71%). Similar results were found for contralateral cancer, PPV 40% (95% CI 29-53%) and 19% (95% CI 8-39%) for high- and low-field equipments, respectively. True positive MRI findings prompted conversion from wide local excision (WLE) to more extensive surgery in 12.8% of women while in 6.3% this conversion was inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS: MRI shows high diagnostic accuracy, but MRI findings should be pathologically verified because of the high FP rate. Future research on this emerging technology should focus on patient outcome as the primary end-point.