Long-term real-life outcomes of the Clareon® hydrophobic intraocular lens: the Clarte study in 191 eyes : 3-years real-life outcomes of the Clareon® intraocular lens.

BACKGROUND: To describe and analyze the real-life refractive, functional and safety outcomes of the Clareon® intraocular lens (IOL) after 3 years. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively for observational purposes between July 2017 and December 2019 in the ophthalmology department of Desgenettes military hospital in Lyon, France. Eyes that underwent cataract surgery with Claeron® implantation were consecutively included. Patients with a systemic or ocular condition that could affect the visual outcome were excluded. Postoperative corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected (UDVA) distance visual acuities as well as capsule and IOL transparency were assessed at 1 month and 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 326 eyes were analyzed at one month and 191 eyes were reassessed at the 3-year follow-up visit. At 3 years, the mean CDVA was 0.003 LogMAR (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.003 to -0.01) and the mean UDVA was 0.075 (95% CI: 0.054 to 0.095). Three quarters of the patients had an UDVA ≥ 0.097 logMAR (20/25 Snellen equivalent) and 50% had an UDVA ≥ 0 (20/20). The absence of glistening was reported in 95.3% of cases and 4.7% [9] of patients experienced a clinically significant posterior capsular opacification (PCO) for which Nd:YAG treatment was required. CONCLUSIONS: This real-life study reports high-performance and stable long-term refractive outcomes of the Clareon® IOL with good safety in terms of PCO and glistening.

Should Artificial Tears Be Used During the Preoperative Assessment of Toric IOLs Before Age-Related Cataract Surgery? The TORIDE Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of the use of artificial tears during the preoperative work-up performed before age-related cataract surgery, when a toric intraocular lens (IOL) was indicated. METHODS: This was a monocentric prospective study assessing 73 eyes of 51 patients, included consecutively after a preoperative work-up performed without artificial tears (no artificial tears group), when a toric IOL was indicated. Each included patient underwent a second series of examinations: biometry using the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) and topography using the OPD-Scan II (Nidek), 1 minute after artificial tears instillation (artificial tears group; hyaluronate de sodium 0.15%, threalose 3% [Théalose; Théa]). Changes in anterior corneal astigmatism and subsequent changes in toric IOL calculation were analyzed. The error in predicted residual astigmatism was calculated. RESULTS: Anterior corneal astigmatism and total corneal astigmatism measured with the IOLMaster 700 were significantly modified when artificial tears were instilled before the examinations (1.51 ± 0.57 diopters [D], range: 0.75 to -3.55 vs 1.42 ± 0.63 D, range: 0.42 to 3.35 D; P = .043 and 1.59 ± 0.54 D, range: 0.87 to 3.48 vs 1.51 ± 0.59 D, range: 0.56 to 3.27 D, P = .038, respectively). This modification led to a change in IOL cylinder calculation in 43.8% of cases and to a change in implantation axis greater than 10° in 17.7% of cases. These changes were significantly greater in patients with a breakup time (BUT) less than 5 seconds (57.5% and 27.8%, with P = .009 and .029, respectively). In the subgroup of patients with a BUT of less than 5 seconds, the mean absolute error in predicted astigmatism was significantly lower after artificial tears instillation (0.48 ± 0.50 D, range: 0.00 to 2.79 vs 0.37 ± 0.25 D, range: 0.00 to 1.10 D, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Dry eye significantly impacted toric IOL calculations and should be taken into account during the preoperative assessments. Using artificial tears reduced the number of refractive errors. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(11):759-766.].