Biomarkers for characterization and therapeutic orientation in castration-resistant prostate cancer. / Biomarcadores para la caracterización y orientación terapéutica en Cáncer de Próstata Resistente a la Castración (CPRC).

Whole exome sequencing studies haverevealed the molecular landscape of metastatic CastrateResistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) providingnew information about prognostic and predictive factorsof response to therapies. These studies highlightedpotentially actionable targets leading to the beginingof the biomarker-driven era in prostate cancer.Alterations in androgen receptor (AR), DNA repair genes,PI3K-AKT-MTOR pathway or in genes involved incell cycle are frequently observed in mCRPC patientsand may be relevant in the resistance induced mechanismto approve therapy in this setting. Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitor in BRCA mutatedpatients, pembrolizumab (inmune checkpoint inhibitors)in mCRPC patients with mismatch repair genedefects and microsatellite instability and ipatasertib(AKT inhibitor) in patients with loss of function inPTEN are examples on how molecular information canbe useful to improve treatment selection. Nonethelessthe heterogeneity of advanced PC, the lack of consensusregarding the optimal biological source of analysisand the optimal time and technique for the analisysare still challenges that need to be defined in the nextfuture. The aim is to review the current literature concerningprognostic and predictive marker of responseto therapies in the mCRPC setting.

Estudios de secuenciación completa delexoma han revelado el perfil molecular del pacientecon Cáncer de Próstata Resistente a la Castración metastásico(CPRCm) proporcionando nueva informaciónsobre factores pronósticos y predictivos de respuestaa las distintas alternativas terapéuticas. Muchos deestos estudios han resaltado numerosas dianas molecularesaccionables desde un punto de vista farmacológico,conduciéndonos al comienzo de la medicina deprecisión en el Cáncer de Próstata (CP). Alteracionesen el Receptor de Andrógenos (RA), en genes reparadoresde DNA, en la vía de PI3K-AKT-MTOR o en genesimplicados en el ciclo celular son frecuentementeobservadas en CPRCm y pueden ser relevantes en la selección terapéutica y en la comprensión de los mecanismosde resistencia.Los inhibidores de la poli (ADP-ribosa) polimerasaen pacientes con mutaciones en BRCA, pembrolizumab(inhibidor de los puntos de control inmunológico)en pacientes CPRCm con alteraciones en genesimplicados en el "mismatch repair" o inestabilidad demicrosatélites e ipatasertib (inhibidor de AKT) en pacientescon pérdida de función de PTEN son ejemplosde cómo la información molecular puede ser útil paraoptimizar la selección terapéutica en este escenario.No obstante, la heterogeneidad del CP avanzado, lafalta de consenso sobre la fuente biológica óptima parael análisis, el momento y la técnica de análisis continúansiendo desafíos a definir en un fututo próximo.El objetivo es revisar la literatura actual sobre marcadorespronósticos y predictivos de respuesta a tratamientoen el entorno del CPRCm.

Biomarcadores para la caracterización y orientación terapéutica en cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración (cprc) / Biomarkers for characterization and therapeutic orientation in castration-resistant prostate cáncer

- Estudios de secuenciación completa delexoma han revelado el perfil molecular del pacientecon Cáncer de Próstata Resistente a la Castración metastásico (CPRCm) proporcionando nueva informaciónsobre factores pronósticos y predictivos de respuestaa las distintas alternativas terapéuticas. Muchos deestos estudios han resaltado numerosas dianas moleculares accionables desde un punto de vista farmacológico, conduciéndonos al comienzo de la medicina deprecisión en el Cáncer de Próstata (CP). Alteracionesen el Receptor de Andrógenos (RA), en genes reparadores de DNA, en la vía de PI3K-AKT-MTOR o en genes implicados en el ciclo celular son frecuentementeobservadas en CPRCm y pueden ser relevantes en la selección terapéutica y en la comprensión de los mecanismos de resistencia.Los inhibidores de la poli (ADP-ribosa) polimerasaen pacientes con mutaciones en BRCA, pembrolizumab (inhibidor de los puntos de control inmunológico) en pacientes CPRCm con alteraciones en genesimplicados en el “mismatch repair” o inestabilidad demicrosatélites e ipatasertib (inhibidor de AKT) en pacientes con pérdida de función de PTEN son ejemplosde cómo la información molecular puede ser útil paraoptimizar la selección terapéutica en este escenario.No obstante, la heterogeneidad del CP avanzado, lafalta de consenso sobre la fuente biológica óptima parael análisis, el momento y la técnica de análisis continúan siendo desafíos a definir en un fututo próximo.El objetivo es revisar la literatura actual sobre marcadores pronósticos y predictivos de respuesta a tratamiento en el entorno del CPRCm. (AU)

Whole exome sequencing studies haverevealed the molecular landscape of metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) providingnew information about prognostic and predictive factors of response to therapies. These studies highlighted potentially actionable targets leading to the begining of the biomarker-driven era in prostate cancer.Alterations in androgen receptor (AR), DNA repair genes, PI3K-AKT-MTOR pathway or in genes involved incell cycle are frequently observed in mCRPC patientsand may be relevant in the resistance induced mechanism to approve therapy in this setting. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor in BRCA mutatedpatients, pembrolizumab (inmune checkpoint inhibitors) in mCRPC patients with mismatch repair genedefects and microsatellite instability and ipatasertib (AKT inhibitor) in patients with loss of function inPTEN are examples on how molecular information canbe useful to improve treatment selection. Nonethelessthe heterogeneity of advanced PC, the lack of consensus regarding the optimal biological source of analysisand the optimal time and technique for the analisysare still challenges that need to be defined in the nextfuture. The aim is to review the current literature concerning prognostic and predictive marker of responseto therapies in the mCRPC setting. (AU)

Prevalence of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Metastasis to Cloquet's Ilioinguinal Lymph Node.

PURPOSE: Cloquet's node, located at the junction between the deep inguinal nodes and the external iliac chain, is easily accessible and commonly excised during pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer. However, we hypothesize that Cloquet's node is not part of lymphatic metastatic spread of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2016 and June 2019, 105 consecutive patients with high-risk prostate cancer (cT3a or Grade Group 4/5, or prostate specific antigen >20 ng/ml) underwent a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. First, Cloquet's node was identified, retrieved and submitted separately to pathology as right and left Cloquet's node. Next, a pelvic lymph node dissection was completed including the external iliac, obturator fossa and hypogastric nodal packets. Each lymph node was cut into 3 mm slices which were separately embedded in paraffin, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and examined microscopically. RESULTS: The final analysis included 95 patients. In this high-risk population, the median number of nodes removed was 22 (IQR 18-29); 39/95 patients (41%) had lymph node metastasis. The median number of Cloquet's nodes removed was 2 (IQR 2-3). Cloquet's node was negative in all but 1 patient (1.1%), who had very high-risk features and high metastatic burden in the lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk prostate cancer, metastasis to the ilioinguinal node of Cloquet is rare. Given this low prevalence, Cloquet's node can be safely excluded from the pelvic lymph node dissection template.

Changes in resting-state measures of prostate cancer patients exposed to androgen deprivation therapy.

The aim of the present work is to describe the differences in rs-fMRI measures (Amplitude of low frequency fluctuations [ALFF], Regional Homogeneity [ReHo] and Functional Connectivity [FC]) between patients exposed to Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and a control group. Forty-nine ADT patients and fifteen PC-non-ADT patients (Controls) were included in the study. A neuropsychological evaluation and a resting-state fMRI was performed to evaluate differences in ALFF and ReHo. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was also performed. ROIs were selected among those whose androgen receptor expression (at RNA-level) was the highest. FC analysis was performed using the same ROIs. Higher ALFF in frontal regions and temporal regions was identified in Controls than in ADT patients. In the ROI analysis, higher activity for Controls than ADT patients was shown in the left inferior frontal gyrus and in the left precentral gyrus. Lower ALFF in the right hippocampus and the lateral geniculate nucleus of the right thalamus was identified for Controls than ADT patients. Higher ReHo was observed in Controls in the left parietal-occipital area. Finally, ADT patients presented an increase of FC in more regions than Controls. These differences may reflect an impairment in brain functioning in ADT users.

Pathological findings in very low risk prostate cancer in surgical specimens. / Hallazgos patológicos en el cáncer de próstata de muy bajo riesgo en piezas de prostatectomía radical.

OBJECTIVE: Perform a detailed anatomopathological analysis of consecutive surgical specimens in men with clinically very low risk prostate cancer according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 799 prostate cancer patients who under went radical prostatectomy between January 2005 and December 2013. We identified 81 consecutive patients with clinically very low risk prostate cancer. The slides of the patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were re-reviewed. The parameters studied were: pathological stage, histological grade by Gleason score (GSS), margins involvement, tumor percentage (PT), and number of apparently independent tumor foci (FT). RESULTS: The patients had organ-confined tumors in almost all of them (pT2: 97.5%). Most of the cancers studied were bilateral (pT2c: 67.9%), multifocal (FT≥2:88.8%), with a low tumor percentage (PTand with a low Gleason Score (GSS≤6: 91,3%). Non-confined disease: 2.5%, all cases extra-prostatic extension (pT3a). GSS>6: 8,6%, all cases GSS7 (3+4). CONCLUSIONS: The NCCN criteria for very low risk prostate cancer help to make a good selection of non-aggressive tumors and are a useful tool for including patients in an active surveillance program.

OBJETIVO: Realizar un análisis patológic odetallado de las piezas de prostatectomía radical en pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer de próstata de muy bajo riesgo según los criterios de la NCCN. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El estudio incluye 799 pacientes con cáncer de próstata a los que se realizó una prostatectomía radical entre 2005 y 2013. 81 pacientes con cáncer de próstata clínicamente de muy bajo riesgo fueron identificados. Las laminillas de los pacientes identificados fueron revisadas. Los parámetros estudiados fueron: estadio patológico, grado de Gleason, márgenes quirúrgicos, % de tumor, y el numero de focos tumorales aparentemente independientes. RESULTADOS: La gran mayoría de pacientes presentaron tumores órgano-confinados (pT2: 97,5%). El 68% de los canceres fue bilateral (pT2c), multifocal (mas de2 focos 88%), con un porcentaje tumoral de menos del 10% en el 80% de los casos y mas del 90% con Gleason 6. La enfermedad no órgano-confinada se evidencio en 2,5% pT3a. CONCLUSIONES: Los criterios de NCCN para muy bajo riesgo nos ayudan a clasificar pacientes con tumores poco agresivos y son una buena herramienta para seleccionar pacientes para programas de vigilancia activa.

Hallazgos patológicos en el cáncer de próstata de muy bajo riesgo en piezas de prostatectomía radical / Pathological findings in very low risk prostate cancer in surgical specimens

OBJETIVO: Realizar un análisis patológico detallado de las piezas de prostatectomía radical en pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer de próstata de muy bajo riesgo según los criterios de la NCCN. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El estudio incluye 799 pacientes con cáncer de próstata a los que se realizó una prostatectomía radical entre 2005 y 2013. 81 pacientes con cáncer de próstata clínicamente de muy bajo riesgo fueron identificados. Las laminillas de los pacientes identificados fueron revisadas. Los parámetros estudiados fueron: estadio patológico, grado de Gleason, márgenes quirúrgicos, % de tumor, y el numero de focos tumorales aparentemente independientes. RESULTADOS: La gran mayoría de pacientes presentaron tumores órgano-confinados (pT2: 97,5%). El 68% de los canceres fue bilateral (pT2c), multifocal (mas de 2 focos 88%), con un porcentaje tumoral de menos del 10% en el 80% de los casos y mas del 90% con Gleason 6. La enfermedad no órgano-confinada se evidencio en 2,5% pT3a. CONCLUSIONES: Los criterios de NCCN para muy bajo riesgo nos ayudan a clasificar pacientes con tumores poco agresivos y son una buena herramienta para seleccionar pacientes para programas de vigilancia activa

OBJECTIVE: Perform a detailed anatomopathological analysis of consecutive surgical specimens in men with clinically very low risk prostate cancer according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 799 prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between January 2005 and December 2013. We identified 81 consecutive patients with clinically very low risk prostate cancer. The slides of the patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were re-reviewed. The parameters studied were: pathological stage, histological grade by Gleason score (GSS), margins involvement, tumor percentage (PT), and number of apparently independent tumor foci (FT). RESULTS: The patients had organ-confined tumors in almost all of them (pT2: 97.5%). Most of the cancers studied were bilateral (pT2c: 67.9%), multifocal (FT≥2: 88.8%), with a low tumor percentage (PT<10%: 80.2%) and with a low Gleason Score (GSS≤6: 91,3%). Non-confined disease: 2.5%, all cases extra-prostatic extension (pT3a). GSS>6: 8,6%, all cases GSS7(3+4). CONCLUSIONS: The NCCN criteria for very low risk prostate cancer help to make a good selection of non-aggressive tumors and are a useful tool for including patients in an active surveillance program

Androgen deprivation therapy increases brain ageing.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is the most frequent neoplasia in the male population and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is frequently used in the management of the disease. AIM: To evaluate the effect of ADT exposure on cognitive status, grey matter volume (GMV) and white matter lesion (WML) load. METHODS: Fifty ADT patients and fifteen PC-non-ADT (control) patients were included in the study. A neuropsychological evaluation was performed and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with anatomical T1 and FLAIR sequences, was performed to evaluate the GMV and the WML burden. RESULTS: Most of the patients included in the study presented a significant cognitive impairment (CI). No significant differences were identified in the cognitive assessment between the studied groups, but when considering the educational background intragroup differences were found.No significant difference of GMV and WML volume were identified between groups, but a negative relationship between the ADT period and the GMV was identified. Furthermore, a significant positive association between the age and the lesion volume was found in the ADT group (ß=.406; p=.004). CONCLUSION: PC patients exposed to ADT present an acceleration of age-related brain changes, such as WML development and GMV loss.

Prostate cancer epidemiology.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to provide an evidence-based analysis of the epidemiological situation of prostate cancer today and its future perspectives. METHOD: A literature review on Medline has been made of the most relevant papers related to the epidemiology of prostate cancer and their etiological factors. We selected for review those manuscripts with the highest level of evidence. RESULTS: Prostate cancer is the second most common neoplasia in men worldwide. The increasing trend in the incidente counteracted by an overall decrease in mortality from this disease have made prostate cancer an important health problem because of its high prevalence. There are significant geographic differences in terms of incidence and mortality. Age, ethnicity and family history are risk factors demonstrated but there are other factors related to the environment that play an important role in the biology of prostate cancer and tumor genesis. CONCLUSIONS: In the last 20 years there has been a progressive increase in the global incidence of this disease probably secondary to a progressive aging population, the improvement in diagnostic techniques and a higher intensity screening of prostate cancer. Though mortality has been reduced prostate cancer is the sixth cause of cancer-specific death worldwide. The combination of genetic and environmental factors may explain the ethnic and geographical variations in the incidence and mortality from prostate cancer.

Epidemiología del cáncer de próstata / Prostate cancer epidemiology

OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente trabajo es ofrecer un análisis basado en la evidencia de la situación epidemiológica del cáncer de próstata en la actualidad y sus perspectivas futuras. MÉTODO: Se ha realizado una revisión bibliográfica en Medline de los trabajos más relevantes referidos a la epidemiología del cáncer de próstata y a sus factores etiológicos. Se seleccionaron para revisión aquellos manuscritos con mayor nivel de evidencia. RESULTADOS: El cáncer de próstata es la segunda neoplasia más frecuente en hombres a nivel mundial. La tendencia incremental de la incidencia contrarrestada con un descenso global en la mortalidad por esta patología hacen del cáncer de próstata un importante problema de salud debido a su elevada prevalencia. Existen importantes diferencias geográficas tanto en relación a la incidencia como a la mortalidad. La edad, la etnia y los antecedentes familiares son factores de riesgo demostrados pero existen también otros factores relacionados con el entorno que también juegan un papel importante en la biología del cáncer de próstata y en la génesis tumoral. CONCLUSIÓN: En los últimos 20 años se ha producido un incremento progresivo en la incidencia mundial de esta patología, probablemente secundaria a un progresivo envejecimiento poblacional, a la mejora en las técnicas diagnósticas y a una mayor intensidad de cribado de esta patología. A pesar de que la mortalidad se ha reducido, el cáncer de próstata es la sexta causa de muerte cáncer-específica a nivel mundial. La combinación de factores genéticos y ambientales podría explicar las variaciones étnicas y geográficas en cuanto a las tasas de incidencia y mortalidad por cáncer de próstata

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to provide an evidence-based analysis of the epidemiological situation of prostate cancer today and its future perspectives. METHOD: A literature review on Medline has been made of the most relevant papers related to the epidemiology of prostate cancer and their etiological factors. We selected for review those manuscripts with the highest level of evidence. RESULTS: Prostate cancer is the second most common neoplasia in men worldwide. The increasing trend in the incidente counteracted by an overall decrease in an important health problem because of its high prevalence. There are significant geographic differences in terms of incidence and mortality. Age, ethnicity and family history are risk factors demonstrated but there are other factors related to the environment that play an important role in the biology of prostate cancer and tumor genesis. CONCLUSIONS: In the last 20 years there has been a progressive increase in the global incidence of this disease probably secondary to a progressive aging population, the improvement in diagnostic techniques and a higher intensity screening of prostate cancer. Though mortality has been reduced prostate cancer is the sixth cause of cancer-specific death worldwide. The combination of genetic and environmental factors may explain the ethnic and geographical variations in the incidence and mortality from prostate cancer