Phototherapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds: Preclinical Evaluation of Antimicrobial Blue Light (450-460 nm) Using In Vitro Assays and a Human Wound Skin Model.

Objective: To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of burn wounds with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we tested different treatment regimens with antibacterial blue light (BL). Background: Infections of burn wounds are serious complications and require effective and pathogen-specific therapy. Hereby, infections caused by P. aeruginosa pose a particular challenge in clinical practice due to its resistance to many antibiotics and topical antiseptics. Methods: LED-based light sources (450-460 nm) with different intensities and treatment times were used. Antibacterial effects against P. aeruginosa were determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, human skin wound models, and fluorescence imaging. Results: In suspension assays, BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2) reduced bacterial number (>5 log10 CFU/mL). Applying 144 J/cm2, using 40 mW/cm2 for 1 h was more effective (>4 log10 CFU) than using 20 mW/cm2 for 2 h (>1.5 log10 CFU). BL with low irradiance (24 h, 3.5 mW/cm2, 300 J/cm2) only revealed bacterial reduction in thin bacteria-containing medium layers. In infected in vitro skin wounds only BL irradiation (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2) exerted a significant antimicrobial efficacy (2.94 log10 CFU/mL). Conclusions: BL treatment may be an effective therapy for P. aeruginosa-infected wounds to avoid radical surgical debridement. However, a significant antibacterial efficacy can only be achieved with higher irradiances and longer treatment times (min. 40 mW/cm2; >1 h), which cannot be easily integrated into regular clinical treatment protocols, for example, during a dressing change. Further studies are necessary to establish BL therapy for infected burns among tissue compatibility and interactions with previous therapeutic agents.

Pulsed low-intensity laser treatment stimulates wound healing without enhancing biofilm development in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: Treating infected or chronic wounds burdened with biofilms still is a major challenge in medical care. Healing-stimulating factors lose their efficacy due to bacterial degradation, and antimicrobial substances negatively affect dermal cells. Therefore, alternative treatment approaches like the pulsed low intensity laser therapy (LILT) require consideration. METHODS: The effect of pulsed LILT (904 nm, in three frequencies) on relevant human cells of the wound healing process (fibroblasts (BJ), keratinocytes (HaCaT), endothelial cells (HMEC), monocytes (THP-1)) were investigated in in-vitro and ex-vivo wound models with respect to viability, proliferation and migration. Antimicrobial efficacy of the most efficient frequency in cell biological analyses of LILT (3200 Hz) was determined in a human biofilm model (lhBIOM). Quantification of bacterial load was evaluated by suspension method and qualitative visualization was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Pulsed LILT at 904 nm at 3200 Hz ± 50% showed the most positive effects on metabolic activity and proliferation of human wound cells in vitro (after 72 h - BJ: BPT 0.97 ± 0.05 vs. 0.75 ± 0.04 (p = 0.0283); HaCaT: BPT 0.79 ± 0.04 vs. 0.59 ± 0.02 (p = 0.0106); HMEC: 0.74 ± 0.02 vs. 0.52 ± 0.04 (p = 0.009); THP-1: 0.58 ± 0.01 vs. 0.64 ± 0.01 (p > 0.05) and ex vivo. Interestingly, re-epithelialization was stimulated in a frequency-independent manner. The inhibition of metabolic activity after TNF-α application was abolished after laser treatment. No impact of LILT on monocytes was detected. Likewise, the tested LILT regimens showed no growth rate reducing effects on three bacterial strains (after 72 h - PA: -1.03%; SA: -0.02%; EF: -1,89%) and one fungal (-2.06%) biofilm producing species compared to the respective untreated control. Accordingly, no significant morphological changes of the biofilms were observed after LILT treatment in the SEM. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent application of LILT (904 nm, 3200 Hz) seems to be beneficial for the metabolism of human dermal cells during wound healing. Considering this, the lack of disturbance of the behavior of the immune cells and no growth-inducing effect on bacteria and fungi in the biofilm can be assigned as rather positive. Based on this combined mode of action, LILT may be an option for hard to heal wounds infected with persistent biofilms.

In vitro Activity of Antimicrobial Wound Dressings on P. aeruginosa Wound Biofilm.

The treatment of acute and chronic infected wounds with residing biofilm still poses a major challenge in medical care. Interactions of antimicrobial dressings with bacterial load, biofilm matrix and the overall protein-rich wound microenvironment remain insufficiently studied. This analysis aimed to extend the investigation on the efficacy of a variety of antimicrobial dressings using an in vitro biofilm model (lhBIOM) mimicking the specific biofilm-environment in human wounds. Four wound dressings containing polyhexanide (PHMB), octendine di-hydrochloride (OCT), cadexomer-iodine (C-IOD) or ionic silver (AG) were compared regarding their antimicrobial efficacy. Quantitative analysis was performed using a quantitative suspension method, separately assessing remaining microbial counts within the solid biofilm as well as the dressing eluate (representing the absorbed wound exudate). Dressing performance was tested against P. aeruginosa biofilms over the course of 6 days. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to obtain qualitative visualization on changes in biofilm structure. C-IOD demonstrated superior bacterial reduction. In comparison it was the only dressing achieving a significant reduction of more than 7 log10 steps within 3 days. Neither the OCT- nor the AG-containing dressing exerted a distinct and sustained antimicrobial effect. PHMB achieved a non-significant microbicidal effect (1.71 ± 0.31 log10 steps) at day 1. Over the remaining course (6 days) it demonstrated a significant microbistatic effect compared to OCT, AG and the control. Quantitative results in the dressing eluate correlate with those of the solid biofilm model. Overall, AG- and OCT-containing dressings did not achieve the expected anti-biofilm efficacy, while C-IOD performed best. Chemical interaction with the biofilms extrapolymeric substance (EPS), visualized in the SEM, and dressing configuration (agent concentration and release pattern) are suspected to be responsible. The unexpected low and diverse results of the tested antimicrobial dressings indicate a necessity to rethink non-debridement anti-biofilm therapy. Focussing on the combination of biofilm-disruptive (for EPS structure) and antimicrobial (for residing microorganisms) features, as with C-IOD, using dehydration and iodine, appears reasonably complementary and an optimal solution, as suggested by the here presented in vitro data.

Characterization of Blue Light Treatment for Infected Wounds: Antibacterial Efficacy of 420, 455, and 480 nm Light-Emitting Diode Arrays Against Common Skin Pathogens Versus Blue Light-Induced Skin Cell Toxicity.

Objective: To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of chronic wounds, we tested different blue light (BL)-emitting light-emitting diode arrays (420, 455, and 480 nm) against wound pathogens and investigated in parallel BL-induced toxic effects on human dermal fibroblasts. Background: Wound infection is a major factor for delayed healing. Infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are clinically relevant caused by their ability of biofilm formation and their quickly growing antibiotics resistance. BL has demonstrated antimicrobial properties against various microbes. Methods: Determination of antibacterial and cell toxic effects by colony-forming units (CFUs)/biofilm/cell viability assays, and live cell imaging. Results: A single BL irradiation (180 J/cm2), of P. aeruginosa at both 420 and 455 nm resulted in a bacterial reduction (>5 log10 CFU), whereas 480 nm revealed subantimicrobial effects (2 log10). All tested wavelengths of BL also revealed bacteria reducing effects on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli (maximum 1-2 log10 CFU) but not on S. aureus. Dealing with biofilms, all wavelengths using 180 J/cm2 were able to reduce significantly the number of P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and S. epidermidis. Here, BL420nm achieved reductions up to 99%, whereas BL455nm and BL480nm were less effective (60-83%). Biofilm-growing S. aureus was more BL sensitive than in the planktonic phase showing a reduction by 63-75%. A significant number of cell toxic events (>40%) could be found after applying doses (>30 J/cm2) of BL420nm. BL455nm showed only slight cell toxicity (180 J/cm2), whereas BL480nm was nontoxic at any dose. Conclusions: BL treatment can be effective against bacterial infections of chronic wounds. Nevertheless, using longer wavelengths >455 nm should be preferred to avoid possible toxic effects on skin and skin cells. To establish BL therapy for infected chronic wounds, further studies concerning biofilm formation and tissue compatibility are necessary.

Plasma medicine and wound management: Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of a medically certified cold atmospheric argon plasma jet.

OBJECTIVES: A major problem for wound healing is contamination with bacteria, often resulting in biofilm formation and wound infection, which, in turn, needs immediate intervention such as surgical debridement and through irrigation. A topical treatment with cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) for wound disinfection may present an alternative and less painful approach. METHODS: This study investigated the antibacterial effects of a cold atmospheric pressure argon plasma jet (kINPen® MED) as a CAP source, using the three-dimensional Staphylococcus aureus immunocompetent biofilm system hpBIOM in addition to a standard planktonic test. Furthermore, skin cell compatibility was evaluated using a keratinocyte (HaCat) model. RESULTS: CAP treatment (0-240 s) followed by incubation (15, 120 min) within the CAP-treated media showed slight bactericidal efficacy under planktonic conditions but no effect on biofilms. However, indirect CAP treatment of keratinocytes performed under the same conditions resulted in a significant decrease in metabolic activity. Short CAP treatment and exposure time (30 s; 15 min) induced a slight increase in the metabolic activity; however, longer treatments and/or exposure times led to pronounced reductions up to 100%. These effects could partially be reversed by addition of catalase, indicating a dominant role of CAP-generated hydrogen peroxide. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that plasma treatment does not lead to the desired disinfection or significant reduction in the bacterial burden of Staphylococcus aureus in a wet milieu or in biofilms. Thus, treatment with CAP could not be recommended as a single anti-bacterial therapy for wounds but could be used to support standard treatments.

Antimicrobial Hypochlorous Wound Irrigation Solutions Demonstrate Lower Anti-biofilm Efficacy Against Bacterial Biofilm in a Complex in-vitro Human Plasma Biofilm Model (hpBIOM) Than Common Wound Antimicrobials.

Biofilms pose a relevant factor for wound healing impairment in chronic wounds. With 78% of all chronic wounds being affected by biofilms, research in this area is of high priority, especially since data for evidence-based selection of appropriate antimicrobials and antiseptics is scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the anti-biofilm efficacy of commercially available hypochlorous wound irrigation solutions compared to established antimicrobials. Using an innovative complex in-vitro human plasma biofilm model (hpBIOM), quantitative reduction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) biofilms by three hypochlorous irrigation solutions [two <0.08% and one 0.2% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO)] was compared to a 0.04% polyhexanide (PHMB) irrigation solution and 0.1% octenidine-dihydrochloride/phenoxyethanol (OCT/PE). Efficacy was compared to a non-challenged planktonic approach, as well as with increased substance volume over a prolonged exposure (up to 72 h). Qualitative visualization of biofilms was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Both reference agents (OCT/PE and PHMB) induced significant biofilm reductions within 72 h, whereby high volume OCT/PE even managed complete eradication of P. aeruginosa and MRSA biofilms after 72 h. The tested hypochlorous wound irrigation solutions achieved no relevant penetration and eradication of biofilms despite increased volume and exposure. Only 0.2% NaClO managed a low reduction under prolonged exposure. The results demonstrate that low-dosed hypochlorous wound irrigation solutions are significantly less effective than PHMB-based irrigation solution and OCT/PE, thus unsuitable for biofilm eradication on their own. The used complex hpBIOM thereby mimics the highly challenging clinical wound micro-environment, providing a more profound base for future clinical translation.