Comparison of the effect of single vs dual antiplatelet agents on post-operative haemorrhage after renal transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: A significant proportion of renal transplant patients have cardiovascular comorbidities for which they receive treatment with antiplatelet agents. The aim of this study was to systematically review the current literature reporting perioperative outcomes for patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy compared to single antiplatelet therapy at the time of kidney transplantation with particular reference to the risks of postoperative haemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were utilized to identify articles reporting outcomes of renal transplant recipients on single antiplatelet therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy. These outcomes were compared using a random effects model meta-analysis where appropriate. RESULTS: Six articles were incorporated in the analysis, including 130 receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, and 781 in the single antiplatelet therapy group. There was a significantly higher risk of post-operative haemorrhagic events in the dual antiplatelet therapy group compared to the single antiplatelet therapy group (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.19-2.09, p = 0.001). Post-operative cardiovascular event rates were similar between both groups in individual studies, although this could not be quantitatively analysed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a higher risk of post-operative haemorrhage compared to the use of single antiplatelet therapy without increased rates of surgical intervention. However, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy may provide protection from cardiovascular events in an inherently higher risk patient group.

Renal Transplant Artery Autologous Saphenous Vein Graft Aneurysms: Late Presentation and the Need for Recall and Surveillance.

Autologous saphenous vein grafts are occasionally used in renal transplant recipients, particularly in living donors with short donor vessels or after donor vessel injury during allograft procurement. Autologous saphenous vein graft aneurysm formation is described as a late complication following the use of this conduit in renal transplant. We report a case of a 45-year-old woman who developed an autologous saphenous vein graft aneurysm 21 years after her living donor transplant, which was successfully managed with explantation of the graft, cold perfusion ex situ, and resection of the aneurysm, which was followed by reconstruction using deceased donor iliac vessels. The graft was then successfully reimplanted. Based on this experience and after a review of the literature related to autologous saphenous vein graft aneurysms in renal transplant, we recommend that surveillance for this particular complication should be considered no later than 10 years after implant of an autologous saphenous vein graft when used as an arterial conduit.

Outcomes From Pancreatic Transplantation in Donation After Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplantation remains the gold standard for treatment for type I diabetes providing an insulin-independent, normoglycemic state. Increasingly, donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are used in view of the organ donor shortage. We aimed to systematically review recipient outcomes from DCD donors and where possible compared these with donor after brain death (DBD) donors. METHODS: We searched the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library from inception to March 2015, for studies reporting the outcome of DCD pancreas transplants. We appraised studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and meta-analyzed using a random effects model. RESULTS: We identified 18 studies, 4 retrospective and 6 prospective cohort studies and 8 case reports. Our bias assessment revealed that although studies were well conducted, some studies had potential confounding factors and absence of comparator groups. Eight of the 18 studies included a DBD comparison group comprising 23 609 transplant recipients. Importantly, there was no significant difference in allograft survival up to 10 years (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.74-1.31; P = 0.92), or patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.62-2.78; P = 0.47) between DCD and DBD pancreas transplants. We estimated that the odds of graft thrombosis was 1.67 times higher in DCD organs (95% CI, 1.04-2.67; P = 0.006). However, subgroup analysis found thrombosis was not higher in recipients whose DCD donors were given antemortem heparin (P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Using current DCD criteria, pancreas transplantation is a viable alternative to DBD transplantation, and antemortem interventions including heparinization may be beneficial. This potential benefit of DCD pancreas donation warrants further study.