Comparative Performance of Pulmonary Ultrasound, Chest Radiograph, and CT Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure.

OBJECTIVES: The study goal was to concurrently evaluate agreement of a 9-point pulmonary ultrasound protocol and portable chest radiograph with chest CT for localization of pathology to the correct lung and also to specific anatomic lobes among a diverse group of intubated patients with acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Medical, surgical, and neurologic ICUs at a 670-bed urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Intubated adults with acute respiratory failure having chest CT and portable chest radiograph performed within 24 hours of intubation. INTERVENTIONS: A 9-point pulmonary ultrasound examination performed at the time of intubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients had pulmonary ultrasound, portable chest radiograph, and chest CT performed within 24 hours of intubation. Overall agreement of pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph findings with correlating lobe ("lobe-specific" agreement) on CT was 87% versus 62% (p < 0.001), respectively. Relaxing the agreement definition to a matching CT finding being present anywhere within the correct lung ("lung-specific" agreement), not necessarily the specific mapped lobe, showed improved agreement for both pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph respectively (right lung: 92.5% vs 65.7%; p < 0.001 and left lung: 83.6% vs 71.6%; p = 0.097). The highest lobe-specific agreement was for the finding of atelectasis/consolidation for both pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph (96% and 73%, respectively). The lowest lobe-specific agreement for pulmonary ultrasound was normal lung (79%) and interstitial process for portable chest radiograph (29%). Lobe-specific agreement differed most between pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph for interstitial findings (86% vs 29%, respectively). Pulmonary ultrasound had the lowest agreement with CT for findings in the left lower lobe (82.1%). Pleural effusion agreement also differed between pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph (right: 99% vs 87%; p = 0.009 and left: 99% vs 85%; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: A clinical, 9-point pulmonary ultrasound protocol strongly agreed with specific CT findings when analyzed by both lung- and lobe-specific location among a diverse population of mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure; in this regard, pulmonary ultrasound significantly outperformed portable chest radiograph.

Feasibility and value of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery wedge excision of small pulmonary nodules in patients with malignancy.

PURPOSE: Advances in CT scanning have presented physicians with the challenge of diagnosing small (< 10 mm) or deep (> 5 mm) pulmonary nodules (SmPNs) in patients with known malignancies during workup or follow-up. Wedge excision of SmPNs is difficult with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and often requires the performance of a thoracotomy. The value of the early detection of metastatic disease must be weighed against the morbidity (ie, thoracotomy) that is necessarily involved in obtaining the information. Little is known about the incidence of metastases in this subset of patients. We describe a VATS technique that allows the reliable excisional biopsy of SmPNs and present our findings in this patient population. METHODS: Using CT scan localization, 150 micro Ci technetium sulfur colloid is injected into the area of the pulmonary nodule. Additional blue dye is injected at the lung surface. During VATS, a sterile gamma probe is used to identify the area of radioactivity and plan placement of staple lines performed by an endostapling instrument. Palpation and the presence of radioactivity in the specimen supported the resection of the correct nodule, and CT scan findings confirmed the procedure. Between March 2000 and January 2001, 17 patients with known malignancies and SmPNs underwent VATS excisional biopsies. Six patients received a new diagnosis of malignancy, and 11 patients were in follow-up of a previously treated malignancy. The malignancies included the following: breast (four patients), head and neck (four patients), pancreas (two patients), lymphoma (two patients), lung (one patient), prostate (one patient), rectal (one patient), seminoma (one patient), and urethral (one patient). RESULTS: All lesions were successfully resected on the first try. Nodules were removed from 10 segments and all lobes. The mean (+/-/SD) nodule size was 9.2 +/- 3.6 mm, and the mean depth was 9.4 +/- 5.2 mm. Fourteen of 17 nodules (82.4%) could be neither seen nor felt using standard VATS techniques. Diagnoses included metastatic (four patients), new primary lung cancer (one patient), acid-fast bacillus (one patient), granuloma (seven patients), carcinoid (two patients), and inflammatory pseudotumor (two patients). Among these lesions, 29.4% were malignant, and 35.3% of patients received a diagnosis that altered their therapy. Five of 12 SmPNs (41.7%) < 10 mm in size were malignant. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Patients returned to full activity within 1 week. CONCLUSION: VATS excision of SmPNs after CT scan localization with radiolabeled technetium is reliable, reproducible, and associated with minimal morbidity. The technique prevented thoracotomies in 82.4% of patients. Despite the small size of these lesions, malignancy was found 29.4% of the time. This technique allows the early diagnosis of SmPNs, with low morbidity, in patients with known malignancies. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The reliability of this technique, the high incidence of malignancy, and the reduction in morbidity from undergoing excisional biopsy procedures will encourage the clinician to strive for earlier and more aggressive diagnoses of SmPNs.