Strong correlation and high comparability of capillary electrophoresis and three different methods for HbA1c measurement in a population without hemoglobinopathy.

The present study aimed to investigate the comparability of capillary electrophoresis (CE) and three different methods for HbA1c measurement. The 270 whole blood samples with normal hemoglobin profiles were analyzed for HbA1c values by the Roche turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (TINIA), the Mindray enzymatic assay (EA), the Arkray high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in comparison with the Sebia CE. The within-laboratory coefficient of variation of all four methods was within the accepted goal (<2%), showing good performance of all of these methods. Pairwise comparisons of HbA1c values obtained by CE and other methods were determined in both total group and subgroups (HbA1c levels of <6.5%, 6.5-8% and >8%). Mean differences of HbA1c values in all groups were very small in which the mean HbA1c value measured by EA was lower while those by TINIA and HPLC were higher than that of CE. The majority of different values were within the limits of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis, indicating good agreement between CE and the others. Less than 5% of percentage differences were out of the total allowable error limit in all groups, showing that differences of HbA1c values between CE and other methods were not clinically significant. Pairwise comparisons of HbA1c values of CE and the others in Passing-Bablok regression and Spearman rank correlation studies displayed high concordance and strong correlation in all groups. In conclusion, the present study showed strong correlation, high comparability and consistent results for HbA1c measurement between capillary electrophoresis and the other three different methods.

Small-dense LDL cholesterol/large-buoyant LDL cholesterol ratio as an excellent marker for indicating lipodystrophy in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the lipid parameters are predicting factors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated lipodystrophy. METHODS: Whole-body fat compositions of HIV-positive patients receiving stavudine-containing antiretroviral regimens (n = 79) were determined. Lipodystrophy was defined as a ratio of trunk fat mass/lower limb fat mass greater than 2.28. Blood samples were analyzed for total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), small-dense LDL-C (sdLDL-C), apoAI, apoB, lipoprotein(a), and CD4 cell counts. Large-buoyant LDL-C (lbLDL-C) was calculated (LDL-C minus sdLDL-C). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were classified as having lipodystrophy. The mean values of triglycerides, HDL-C, sdLDL-C, apoB, TC/HDL-C, apolipoprotein (apo) B/apoAI, and sdLDL-C/lbLDL-C showed significant differences between patients with and without lipodystrophy (P < .02). Using logistic regression analysis, sdLDL-C/lbLDL-C was identified as a significant predictor of lipodystrophy (P < .001). At a ratio of 0.554, the odds ratio was 17.8 with a likelihood ratio of 5.5. CONCLUSIONS: The sdLDL-C/lbLDL-C ratio is an excellent marker for indicating lipodystrophy in HIV-infected patients.

Estimation of plasma small dense LDL cholesterol from classic lipid measures.

Calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (cLDL-C) may differ from direct measurement (dLDL-C), and this difference may depend on presence of small, dense LDL (sdLDL) particles in addition to variation in triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations. The presence of such dependence would offer a simple means to estimate sdLDL. We studied dependence of sdLDL on cLDL-C, dLDL-C, and other variables. We measured the levels of glucose, creatinine, total cholesterol, TG, HDL-C, and dLDL-C using standardized methods in 297 samples. For sdLDL cholesterol (sdLDL-C), a novel homogeneous assay was used. The cLDL-C was calculated using the Friedewald formula for 220 subjects after excluding for liver or renal disease. Using stepwise regression analysis identified non-HDL-C, cLDL-C, and dLDL-C as significant variables (P < .001; R(2) = 0.88). The regression equation was as follows: sdLDL-C (mg/dL) = 0.580 (non-HDL-C) + 0.407 (dLDL-C) - 0.719 (cLDL-C) - 12.05. The sdLDL-C concentration can be estimated from non-HDL-C, dLDL-C, and cLDL-C values. Identification of a simple, inexpensive marker for sdLDL particles provides a cost-effective method for screening cardiovascular disease risk.

Atorvastatin increases expression of low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA in human circulating mononuclear cells.

1. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors, or statins, are commonly used to lower plasma cholesterol levels. HMGCR and the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) are of central importance to cholesterol homeostasis and yet there is a paucity of data on the effect of statins on the regulation of the LDLR and HMGCR in humans. 2. In the present study, we examined the effect of atorvastatin on the expression of HMGCR, LDLR and LDLR-related protein (LRP) mRNA in circulating mononuclear cells. Twelve human volunteers were treated with atorvastatin, 20 mg/day for 4 weeks. 3. Atorvastatin decreased plasma total and LDL-cholesterol by 29% (P < 0.0001) and 41% (P < 0.001), respectively, and increased LDLR mRNA abundance, in absolute terms, by 35% (P < 0.001) and 31% (P < 0.0001) and 37% (P = 0.01) relative to reference GAPDH and beta-actin mRNA, respectively. In contrast, atorvastatin had no significant effect on LRP or HMGCR mRNA levels. 4. The increase in LDLR mRNA in circulating mononuclear cells agrees with the few human studies conducted, as well as with in vitro and animal studies, whereas the unchanged HMGCR mRNA is consistent with the hepatic specificity of atorvastatin. The present study firmly documents an increase in LDLR mRNA levels in response to statin administration in normal humans.

LDL-receptor mRNA expression in men is downregulated within an hour of an acute fat load and is influenced by genetic polymorphism.

Little is known about the immediate effects of dietary fat on the expression of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism in humans. We investigated the effects of a high-fat meal on circulating mononuclear cell messenger RNA (mRNA) for the LDL receptor (LDLR), LDLR-related protein (LRP), and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) over 10 h. Selection of 12 C and 7 T homozygotes for the LRP exon 22 C200T polymorphism for the study also enabled us to examine the influence of this polymorphism on postprandial mRNA expression and lipoproteins, of relevance because of LRP's role in postprandial lipoprotein metabolism and association of the polymorphism with coronary artery disease. We found a postprandial decrease in LDLR mRNA abundance relative to the reference beta-actin (BA) mRNA. The decreased LDLR/BA mRNA value was apparent at 1 h (P < 0.005) and decreased to 25% of baseline at 6 h (P < 0.005). The LRP/BA mRNA value was also lower at 6 h (16% decrease, P < 0.05). HMGCR mRNA expression was unchanged. C homozygotes for the C200T polymorphism had higher LDLR/BA values than T homozygotes (P = 0.01) and although plasma LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations decreased in the postprandial period (P < 0.002), the decrease was less in C than in T homozygotes (P < 0.05). This study constitutes the first observation, to our knowledge, of postprandial changes in LDLR and LRP mRNA expression. It documents immediate effects of a fatty meal on these mRNA as well as an LRP genotype effect on LDLR mRNA and LDL-C.

Influence of exonic polymorphisms in the gene for LDL receptor-related protein (LRP) on risk of coronary artery disease.

The low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-related protein (LRP) is a multifunctional receptor involved in numerous biological processes relevant to vascular biology including lipoprotein metabolism. Several polymorphisms in the LRP gene have been described and in this study we examined their influence on coronary artery disease (CAD). We compared the frequencies of the exon 3 (C766T), exon 6 (C663T), exon 22 (C200T), and four rarer and more recently described polymorphisms in approximately 600 Caucasian subjects aged <50 years with angiographic CAD and approximately 700 similarly aged subjects without symptomatic CAD randomly selected from the community. We found the distribution of exon 22 C200T genotypes to differ significantly between the CAD (CC: 52%, CT: 39%, TT: 9%) and control subjects (CC: 43%, CT: 46%, TT: 11%, P=0.005), with the CC genotype conferring an odds ratio (OR) for CAD of 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2-1.8, P=0.001) despite a lack of significant influence on plasma cholesterol or triglyceride. The other LRP polymorphisms were less common. Two showed an association with CAD; for the exon 3 C766T polymorphism the TT genotype was significantly lower (1.0 vs. 2.7%; OR: 0.36; P=0.04) and, for the exon 6 C663T polymorphism, the heterozygote frequency was higher (6.2 vs. 3.4%; OR: 1.9; P=0.03) in CAD subjects. In conclusion, LRP gene polymorphisms, particularly the relatively common exon 22 C200T polymorphism, are a significant risk factor for premature CAD in Caucasians.