Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(3): 420-427, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28960486

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: EGALITY was a phase III confirmatory efficacy and safety study conducted in patients with plaque-type psoriasis as a part of totality of evidence gathered during the development of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and the etanercept originator product (ETN, Enbrel® ) and evaluate effects of repeated switching between GP2015 and ETN. Results for efficacy, safety and immunogenicity during treatment period (TP) 2 (TP2) are presented pooling the two continued treatment arms (pooled continued) versus the two treatment arms with repeated switches (pooled switched). METHODS: Patients (n = 531) were randomized 1:1 to self-administer GP2015 or ETN twice-weekly subcutaneously during TP1. Patients with a ≥50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 12 were re-randomized for TP2 to continue the same treatment at once-weekly dosing or to undergo three consecutive treatment switches between GP2015 and ETN until week 30. Patients continued the last-assigned treatment during TP2, until week 52. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation [SD]) PASI scores at baseline were similar in patients who underwent multiple switches compared to those with continued treatments during TP2. During TP2, PASI 50, PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates, percent change from baseline in PASI scores and all other efficacy parameters were similar between the pooled switched and pooled continued treatment groups at all time points. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events including injection site reactions was comparable between the pooled switched (36.7%) and pooled continued (34.9%) groups. None of the patients in either treatment group were positive for binding anti-drug antibodies in TP2. CONCLUSION: Treatment efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were similar between the pooled continued and pooled switched treatments during TP2, indicating that there are no effects in the short term on clinical data of multiple switches between GP2015 and ETN.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/inmunología , Adulto , Anticuerpos/inmunología , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Etanercept/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 176(4): 928-938, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27787890

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: GP2015 is a proposed etanercept biosimilar. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and the etanercept originator (ETN, Enbrel® ) in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. METHODS: In total, 531 eligible patients were randomized 1 : 1 to self-administer GP2015 or ETN twice weekly subcutaneously. Patients with ≥ 50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 12 were rerandomized to continue the same treatment on a once-weekly dosing schedule or to undergo a sequence of three treatment switches between GP2015 and ETN until week 30. Thereafter, patients continued treatment with the product they had been assigned to last, up to week 52. RESULTS: The difference in PASI 75 (75% improvement from baseline PASI score) response rates at week 12 between GP2015 and ETN (primary end point) was -2·3%. The 95% confidence interval (-9·85 to 5·30) was well contained within the prespecified margin range of -18 to 18. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 52 was comparable between continued GP2015 (59·8%) and ETN (57·3%); switching treatments revealed comparable safety profiles. Antidrug antibodies, all non-neutralizing, were limited to five patients on ETN during treatment period 1, and one patient in the switched ETN group, who had been treated with GP2015 for 12 weeks at the time of the finding. CONCLUSIONS: The EGALITY study demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and ETN. The study results provide the final clinical confirmation of biosimilarity and contribute to the totality of the evidence proposing that GP2015 is an etanercept biosimilar.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/metabolismo , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Enfermedad Crónica , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Etanercept/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...