Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 2024 Mar 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522642

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver disease undergoing colectomy have higher rates of complications and mortality. The Albumin-Bilirubin score is a recently developed system, established to predict outcomes after hepatectomy, that accounts for liver dysfunction. METHODS: All patients undergoing colectomy were identified in the 2015-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy-targeted database. Demographics and outcomes were compared between patients with Albumin-Bilirubin Grade 1 vs. 2/3. Multivariable regression was performed for outcomes including colorectal-specific complications. Areas under the receiver operative characteristic curves were calculated to determine accuracy of the Albumin-Bilirubin score. RESULTS: Of 86,273 patients identified, 48% (N = 41,624) were Albumin-Bilirubin Grade 1, 45% (N = 38,370) Grade 2 and 7% (N = 6,279) Grade 3. Patents with Grade 2/3 compared to Grade 1 had significantly increased mortality (7.2% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001) and serious morbidity (31% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). Colorectal-specific complications including anastomotic leak (3.7% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001) and prolonged ileus (26% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with Grade 2/3. Grade 2/3 had increased risk of mortality (odds ratio 3.07, p < 0.001) and serious morbidity (1.78, p < 0.001). Albumin-Bilirubin had excellent accuracy in predicting mortality (area under the curve 0.81, p < 0.001) and serious morbidity (0.70, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Albumin-Bilirubin is easily calculated using only serum albumin and total bilirubin values. Grade 2/3 is associated with increased rates of mortality and morbidity following colectomy. Albumin-Bilirubin can be applied to risk-stratify patients prior to colectomy.

2.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 37(2): 108-113, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38322603

RESUMEN

Stage IV colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease and understanding the appropriate treatment options is important. Medical oncologic treatment remains the mainstay of treatment in cases where curative resection is not possible. Surgical intervention is indicated if the primary tumor and associated metastases are amenable to curative resection or if obstructive, bleeding, or perforative complications arise from the tumor. New endoscopic techniques can provide palliation and benefit for patients who cannot undergo surgery and may speed time to chemotherapy initiation. Recently, immunotherapy has shown promise at managing, controlling, and regressing advanced disease, in some cases converting it to curative with resection. For patients that progress while on treatment, continued medical therapy remains the mainstay of treatment. Further research into the benefits of asymptomatic primary tumor resection without curative intent needs to be performed. Colorectal cancer, and more specifically metastatic colorectal cancer, continues to have improved 1- and 5-year survival rates and likely will continue to do so over the coming months and years.

3.
J Res Health Sci ; 23(2): e00577, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37571948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Seasonal variation in hospitalizations for diverticulitis has a sinusoidal pattern, peaking in summer. Little is known about seasonal, regional trends, and risk factors associated with hospital admissions regarding diverticular bleeding in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional population database review using the healthcare cost and utilization project's national inpatient sample. METHODS: Patients that had diagnoses of diverticulitis with bleeding or diverticulosis with bleeding admitted from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017, were identified and stratified by month and season. Then, the potential effects of region, age, gender, race, and patient risk factors on seasonal admissions for diverticular bleeding were explored, and data were analyzed in SAS and presented in Excel using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 54191 hospitalized cases for diverticular bleeding, the peak and the lowest seasons were spring and summer (25.5% vs. 24.2%, P<0.0001). A significant seasonal pattern in comorbidities was also identified, and those with diabetes (P<0.0001), hypertension (HTN) (P<0.0001), obesity (P<0.0001), and those on anticoagulants (P=0.016) all had more bleeding events in the spring. This was noted across US regions, gender, race, and age. Eventually, the southern region had the most admissions for diverticular bleeding at 40.9% (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: A better understanding of these seasonal and regional trends may provide a mechanism to identify a potential trigger for diverticular bleeding events. This helps identify individuals at greatest risk for hospitalization, as well as prepare hospitals to allocate supplies appropriately during the seasons.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Estudios Transversales , Diverticulitis/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Factores de Riesgo
6.
J Res Health Sci ; 23(4): e00595, 2023 Dec 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315910

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has been described outside of North America as peaking in the fall and winter. However, no recent literature has so far investigated the seasonal fluctuations and complications of PUD in the USA. Study Design: Cross-sectional population database review. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of either acute gastric or acute duodenal ulcers from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017, were identified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The proportion of admissions with either hemorrhage or perforation was determined for each season and further subdivided into geographic regions. RESULTS: Of 18829 hospitalizations for PUD, admissions were the highest in the fall (25.9%) while being the lowest in the summer (23.9%). Complications, hemorrhage or perforation, were the highest and the lowest in the fall and spring, respectively (75.7% vs. 73.6%; P=0.060 for comparing all 4 seasons). Geographically, the West had the highest rate of peptic ulcer hemorrhage (64.5%, P=0.004), while the northeast had the highest rate of perforation (14.3%, P=0.003). Hemorrhage was more common in males, those who used aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or anticoagulants, and diabetics (P<0.05). Perforation was less common in males, those with diabetes, obesity, or hypertension (HTN), or those using aspirin or anticoagulants (P<0.05). Helicobacter pylori infection was more associated with perforation in the fall and winter months. CONCLUSION: Seasonal and regional trends in hospitalizations due to PUD may help identify modifiable risk factors, which can improve diagnostic and treatment outcomes for patients by allowing for more targeted identification of vulnerable populations.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Úlcera Péptica , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiología , Aspirina , Anticoagulantes
8.
J Surg Educ ; 79(3): 632-642, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063391

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal surgery is a core component of general surgery. The volume of colorectal surgery performed by general surgery residents throughout training has not been studied. This study aims to analyze trends observed in colorectal-specific case numbers logged by general surgery residents over 16 years. DESIGN: Case number data for general surgery residents was extracted from the publicly available, annually published Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database from 2003 to 2019. Cases were categorized as open or laparoscopic colectomy/proctectomy, colectomy with ileoanal pull-thru, abdomino-perineal resection (APR), transanal rectal tumor excision (TRE), anorectal procedure, colonoscopy, and total colorectal cases. The average case numbers per category was calculated for each year. Linear regression analyzed trends in case categories for all residents and those logged as surgeon chief and junior residents. SETTING: ACGME accredited general surgery residency programs. PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. RESULTS: General surgery residents reported increased numbers of all, chief, and junior resident colorectal cases over the study period (124.5-173.7 cases/yr; 38.4-53.0 cases/yr; 86.4-120.6 cases/yr, all p = 0.00). Average cases for all, chief, and junior residents have increased for laparoscopic colectomy/proctectomy (4.6-26.4 cases/year; 2.7-12.9 cases/year; 2.0-13.5 cases/year, all p = 0.00), anorectal surgeries (26.7-37.7 cases/year; 5.4-9.9 cases/year; 21.3-27.8 cases/year, all p = 0.00), and colonoscopies (35.9-70.6 cases/year, p = 0.00; 6.6-14.1 cases/year, p = 0.01; 29.4-56.5 cases/year, p = 0.00). Average cases for all, chief, and junior residents have decreased for open colectomy/proctectomy (52.0-34.9 cases/year; 21.2-14.3 cases/year; 30.9-20.6 cases/year, all p = 0.00), APR (3.3-2.7 cases/year, p = 0.00; 1.8-1.3 cases/year, p = 0.00; 1.5-1.4 cases/year, p = 0.02), TRE (1.9-1.1 cases/year; 0.7-0.4 cases/year; 1.2-0.6 cases/year, all p = 0.00). Ileoanal pull-thru did not demonstrate a linear trend. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in exposure to colectomies/proctectomies, anorectal procedures and colonoscopies is encouraging, as these common colorectal operations will be encountered in general surgery practice. The observed low case numbers for TRE, APR, and ileoanal pull-thru suggest a need for specialized training.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Cirugía Colorrectal , Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Acreditación , Competencia Clínica , Cirugía Colorrectal/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Cirugía General/educación , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Carga de Trabajo
9.
J Surg Res ; 270: 421-429, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34794065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many low-risk patients receive preoperative laboratory testing (PLT) prior to elective outpatient surgery, with no effect on postoperative outcomes. This has not been studied in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to determine if PLT in this population was predictive of perioperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2015-2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) databases were queried for elective ambulatory anorectal surgeries. PLT was defined as chemistry, hematology, coagulation, or liver function studies obtained ≤30 days preoperatively. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1 and 2 patients were included who underwent elective, ambulatory, benign anorectal surgery. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were compared between those who did and did not receive PLT. Postoperative outcomes were defined as wound-related, procedure-related, major complications, unplanned readmission, and death occurring within 30 days. Multivariate regression analysis determined patient characteristics predictive of receiving testing. RESULTS: Of 3309 patients studied, 48.6% received PLT. On multivariate analysis, older age, female sex, Black race, ASA class 2, and comorbidities were predictive of receiving testing. The complication rates were similar between patients who did and did not receive testing (4.3% versus 3.5%, P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: PLT is performed in over half of low-risk patients receiving elective anorectal surgery. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications between patients who received testing or not, nor with normal versus abnormal results. PLT can be used more judiciously in this population.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 36(9): 2041-2049, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34101003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pathologic hemorrhoids are common among adults age 45-65. Hemorrhoids are characterized as internal or external, and grades 1-4 based on severity. The type and grade dictate treatment, with surgical treatment reserved for grades 3/4. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of various surgical treatments. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials that compare surgical treatments for grade 3/4 hemorrhoids. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done using NetMetaXL and WinBUGS. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies with 3137 participants and 14 surgical treatments for grade 3/4 hemorrhoids were included. Pain was less in patients with techniques such as laser (OR 0.34, CI 0.01-6.51), infrared photocoagulation (OR 0.38, CI 0.02-5.61), and stapling (OR 0.48, CI 0.19-1.25), compared to open and closed hemorrhoidectomies. There was less recurrence with Starion (OR 0.01, CI 0.00-0.46) and harmonic scalpel (OR 0.00, CI 0.00-0.49), compared to infrared photocoagulation and transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Fewer postoperative clinical complications were seen with infrared photocoagulation (OR 0.04, CI 0.00-2.54) and LigaSure (OR 0.16, CI 0.03-0.79), compared to suture ligation and open hemorrhoidectomy. With Doppler-guided (OR 0.26, CI 0.05-1.51) and stapled (OR 0.36, CI 0.15-0.84) techniques, patients return to work earlier when compared to open hemorrhoidectomy and laser. CONCLUSION: There are multiple favorable techniques without a clear "gold standard" based on current literature. Open discussion should be had between patients and physicians to guide individualized care.


Asunto(s)
Hemorreoidectomía , Hemorroides , Adulto , Anciano , Teorema de Bayes , Hemorreoidectomía/efectos adversos , Hemorroides/cirugía , Humanos , Ligadura , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grapado Quirúrgico/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Mod Pathol ; 33(8): 1589-1594, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32152521

RESUMEN

Women living with HIV (WLHIV) are at increased risk for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated anal cancer. Given the "field effect" of HPV pathogenesis, some recommend that anal cancer screening should be limited to WLHIV with prior genital disease. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between anal and genital disease in WLHIV in order to better inform anal cancer screening guidelines. We retrospectively studied 153 WLHIV with biopsy-proven anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (AHSIL) and long-term evaluable cervical/vaginal/vulvar histopathology. Based on the absence or presence of genital HSIL, subjects were categorized as having isolated AHSIL or multicentric HSIL. Demographics, HIV parameters and cervical/anal HPV status were recorded. Chi-square test was used for bivariate analyses. Of 153 WLHIV with AHSIL, 110 (72%) had isolated AHSIL, while 43 (28%) had multicentric HSIL (28 cervical, 16 vulvar, and 8 vaginal HSIL). The median genital surveillance was 8 years (range 1-27). Cervical HPV16/18 infection was associated with multicentric disease (P = 0.001). Overall, 53% of multicentric cases presented genital HSIL preceding AHSIL with median interval 13 years (range 2-23). Paired anal and cervical high-risk HPV results were available for 60 women within 12 months of AHSIL diagnosis: 30 (50%) had anal infection alone, while 30 (50%) had anal/cervical coinfection by 16/18 (15%), non-16/18 (13%), or different types (22%). In conclusion, WLHIV frequently develop AHSILs without pre-existing genital disease or after long latency following a genital HSIL diagnosis. Our findings support anal cancer screening for WLHIV irrespective of prior genital disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/virología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/virología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Lesiones Intraepiteliales Escamosas/virología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Neoplasias Vaginales/virología , Neoplasias de la Vulva/virología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología
14.
Anticancer Res ; 39(1): 17-23, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591436

RESUMEN

The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) in the U.S. is increasing, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Preventative screening is used to monitor precancerous dysplasia known as anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), which can progress to ASCC. High Resolution Anoscopy (HRA) is one screening procedure that uses a colposcope with acetic acid and Lugol's iodine solution to visualize the anal epithelium for AIN. HRA has offered potential in managing AIN, but as more evidence emerges it is unclear whether HRA provides definitive benefit. This narrative review updates readers on the efficacy of HRA in screening AIN, compares HRA to other techniques, compares the use of HRA in various high-risk populations, and offers practical information on the use of HRA. Keyword searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Current literature is mixed regarding the utility of HRA. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively assess the role of HRA.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Colposcopios/tendencias , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Ácido Acético/uso terapéutico , Canal Anal/diagnóstico por imagen , Canal Anal/patología , Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Humanos , Yoduros/uso terapéutico , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología
15.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 28(4): 840-847, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29664848

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gynecologic oncology patients represent a distinct patient population with a variety of surgical risks. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database provides an opportunity to analyze large cohorts of patients over extended periods with high accuracy. Our goal was to develop a postoperative risk assessment calculator capable of providing a standardized, objective means of preoperatively identifying high-risk patients in the gynecologic oncology population. METHODS: We queried the ACS NSQIP database for gynecologic oncology patients from 2005 to 2013. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to generate predictive models specific for 30-day postoperative mortality and major morbidity. RESULTS: There were 12,831 patients with a primary gynecologic malignancy identified: 7847 uterine, 3366 adnexal, 1051 cervical, and 567 perineum cancers. In this cohort, 125 (0.97%) patients died, and 784 (6.11%) major morbidity events were recorded within 30 days of their surgery. For 30-day mortality, the mean calculated predictive probability was 0.128 (SD, 0.219) compared with 0.009 (SD, 0.027) in patients alive 30 days postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The mean predictive probability of major morbidity was 0.097 (SD, 0.095) compared with 0.059 (SD, 0.043) in patients who did not experience major morbidity 30 days postoperatively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Using NSQIP data, these predictive models will help to determine patients at risk for 30-day mortality and major morbidity. Further clinical validation of these models is required.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/mortalidad , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 26(3): 168-73, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24436669

RESUMEN

Colon and rectal resections are among the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. Complication rates of up to 25% have been reported and result in a substantial impact on quality of life and cost of care. Recently, the Surgical Care Improvement Program (SCIP) has promoted guidelines to prevent postoperative and potentially preventable complications. A comprehensive evidenced-based review of these guidelines and other perioperative strategies for practicing colorectal surgeons is the basis of this review.

17.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 24(3): 177-92, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22942800

RESUMEN

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare tumor. However, its incidence has been increasing in men and women over the past 25 years worldwide. Risk factors associated with this cancer are those behaviors that predispose individuals to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and immunosuppression. Anal cancer is generally preceded by high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN), which is most prevalent in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men. High-risk patients may benefit from screening. The most common presentation is rectal bleeding, which is present in nearly 50% of patients. Twenty percent of patients have no symptoms at the time of presentation. Clinical staging of anal cancer requires a digital rectal exam and a positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Endorectal/endoanal ultrasound appears to add more-specific staging information when compared with digital rectal examination alone. Treatment of anal cancer prior to the 1970s involved an abdominoperineal resection. However, the current standard of care for localized anal cancer is concurrent chemoradiation therapy, primarily because of its sphincter-saving and colostomy-sparing potential. Studies have addressed alternative chemoradiation regimens to improve the standard protocol of fluorouracil, misogynic, and radiation, but no alternative regimen has proven superior. Surgery is reserved for those patients with residual disease or recurrence.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...