Exploring a case for education about sexual and gender minorities in postgraduate emergency medicine training: forming recommendations for change.

Social medicine and health advocacy curricula are known to be uncommon in postgraduate medical education. As justice movements work to unveil the systemic barriers experienced by sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations, it is imperative that the emergency medicine (EM) community progress in its efforts to provide equitable, accessible, and competent care for these vulnerable groups. Given the paucity of literature on this subject in the context of EM in Canada, this commentary borrows evidence from other specialties across North America. Trainees across specialties and of all stages are caring for an increasing number of SGM patients. Lack of education at all levels of training is identified as a significant barrier to adequately caring for these populations, thereby precipitating significant health disparities. Cultural competency is often mistakenly attributed to a willingness to treat rather than the provision of quality care. However, positive attitudes do not necessarily correlate with trainee knowledge. Barriers to creating and implementing culturally competent curricula are plentiful, yet facilitating policies and resources are rare. While international bodies continuously publish position statements and calls to action, concrete change is seldom made. The scarcity of SGM curricula can be attributed to the universal absence of formal acknowledgment of SGM health as a required competency by accreditation boards and professional membership associations. This commentary synthesizes hand-picked literature in an attempt to inform healthcare professionals on their journey toward developing culturally competent postgraduate medical education. By thematically organizing evidence into a stepwise approach, the goal of this article is to borrow ideas across medical and surgical specialties to inform the creation of recommendations and make a case for an SGM curriculum for EM programs in Canada.

Education about sexual and gender minorities within Canadian emergency medicine residency programs.

OBJECTIVES: The CAEP 2021 2SLGBTQIA +i panel sought whether a gap exists within Canadian emergency medicine training pertaining to sexual and gender minority communities. This panel aimed to generate practical recommendations on improving emergency medicine education about sexual and gender minorities, thereby improving access to equitable healthcare. METHODS: From August 2020 to June 2021, a panel of emergency medicine practitioners, residents, students, and community representatives met monthly via videoconference. A literature review was undertaken, and three mixed methods surveys were distributed to the CAEP member list, CAEP Resident Section, College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC)iii Emergency Medicine Members Interest Group, and to emergency medicine residency program directors and their residents. Informed by the review and surveys, recommendations were drafted and refined by panel members before presentation at the 2021 CAEP Academic Symposium. A plenary was presented to symposium attendees composed of national emergency medicine community members, which reported the survey results and literature review. All attendees were divided into small groups to develop an action plan for each recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The panel outlines eight recommendations for closing the curricular gap. It identifies three perceived or real barriers to the inclusion of sexual and gender minority content in emergency medicine residency curricula. It acknowledges three enabling recommendations that are beyond the scope of individual emergency medicine programs or emergency departments (EDs), that if enacted would enable the implementation of the recommendations. Each recommendation is accompanied by two action items as a guide to implementation. Each of the three barriers is accompanied by two action items that offer specific solutions to overcome these obstacles. Each enabling recommendation suggests an action that would shift emergency medicine towards sociocultural competence nationally. These recommendations set the primary steps towards closing the educational gap.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Le panel ACMU 2021 2SLGBTQIA+ i a cherché à savoir s'il existe une lacune dans la formation en médecine d'urgence au Canada en ce qui concerne les communautés de minorités sexuelles et de genre. Ce panel visait à générer des recommandations pratiques sur l'amélioration de l'éducation en médecine d'urgence sur les minorités sexuelles et de genre, améliorant ainsi l'accès à des soins de santé équitables. MéTHODES: D'août 2020 à juin 2021, un groupe de praticiens en médecine d'urgence, de résidents, d'étudiants et de représentants communautaires se sont réunis chaque mois par vidéoconférence. Une revue de la littérature a été entreprise et trois enquêtes à méthodes mixtes ont été distribuées à la liste des membres de l'ACMU, à la Section des résidents de l'ACMU, au Groupe d'intérêt des membres en médecine d'urgence du Collège des médecins de famille du Canada (CMFC) iii, ainsi qu'aux directeurs des programmes de résidence en médecine d'urgence et à leurs résidents. À la lumière de l'examen et des sondages, les recommandations ont été rédigées et peaufinées par les membres du comité avant d'être présentées au Symposium universitaire de l'ACMU de 2021. Une séance plénière a été présentée aux participants du symposium, composés de membres de la communauté nationale de la médecine d'urgence, qui ont fait état des résultats du sondage et de la revue de la littérature. Tous les participants ont été répartis en petits groupes afin d'élaborer un plan d'action pour chaque recommandation. CONCLUSIONS: Le groupe d'experts formule huit recommandations pour combler le fossé entre les programmes d'enseignement. Il identifie trois obstacles perçus ou réels à l'inclusion du contenu sur les minorités sexuelles et de genre dans les programmes de résidence en médecine d'urgence. Il reconnaît trois recommandations habilitantes qui dépassent la portée des programmes de médecine d'urgence individuels ou des services d'urgence (SU) et qui, si elles étaient adoptées, permettraient la mise en œuvre des recommandations. Chaque recommandation est accompagnée de deux mesures de suivi comme guide de mise en œuvre. Chacun des trois obstacles est accompagné de deux éléments d'action qui offrent des solutions spécifiques pour surmonter ces obstacles. Chaque recommandation habilitante suggère une action qui ferait évoluer la médecine d'urgence vers une compétence socioculturelle au niveau national. Ces recommandations établissent les principales étapes pour combler l'écart en matière d'éducation.

Navigating the risks of flying during COVID-19: a review for safe air travel.

RATIONALE FOR REVIEW: With air travel restarting, there has been much discourse about the safety of flying during the pandemic. In travel medicine, risk assessment includes estimating baseline risk to the traveller, recognizing factors that may modify that risk, considering the role of interventions to decrease that risk and accounting for a traveller's perception and tolerance of risk. The goals of this review are to identify the in-flight transmission risks of commercial air travel, provide recommendations about the risks of flying during the pandemic and propose strategies to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. KEY FINDINGS: The airline industry has taken a layered approach to increase passenger safety through effective onboard ventilation, extended ventilation at the gate, boarding and deplaning strategies, improved aircraft disinfection and pre-flight screening such as temperature checks and COVID-19 testing. Proximity to an index case may contribute to the risk of transmission more than the seat type or location. The use of face masks has significantly reduced onboard transmission, and mandatory in-flight mask-wearing policies are being enforced. Innovations such as digital health passports may help standardize screening entry requirements at airports and borders, allowing for a safer return to travel. RECOMMENDATIONS: In-flight transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is a real risk, which may be minimized by combining mitigation strategies and infection prevention measures including mandatory masking onboard, minimizing unmasked time while eating, turning on gasper airflow in-flight, frequent hand sanitizing, disinfecting high touch surfaces, promoting distancing while boarding and deplaning, limiting onboard passenger movement, implementing effective pre-flight screening measures and enhancing contact tracing capability. Assessing risk is a cornerstone of travel medicine. It is important to evaluate the multiple factors contributing to the cumulative risk of an individual traveller during the COVID-19 pandemic and to employ a multi-pronged approach to reduce that risk.