RESUMEN
The Gastro-Laryngeal Tube (G-LT) is a modification of the laryngeal tube which provides a dedicated channel for the insertion of an endoscope while acting as a supraglottic airway for ventilation. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of this device in patients undergoing anesthesia for interventional endoscopic biliopancreatic procedures (IEBPPs).A total of 22 patients were included in the study. The G-LT was inserted successfully in all patients. Arterial oxygen saturation was stable; the mean value was 97.9%. The IEBPPs were performed successfully in all patients through the endoscopic channel, with a mean duration of 99 minutes. The maneuverability of the endoscope was considered good in all patients. There were two cases of sore throat after the procedures, two cases of asymptomatic erosion of the upper esophageal mucosa, one case of Mallory-Weiss syndrome, and one case of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Our results suggest that the G-LT is an effective and secure device for airway management and for use during IEBPPs.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/instrumentación , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-GTD) has become the standard procedure for treating symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections. The aim of this series was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of covered self-expanding metal stent (CSEMS) placement for treating infected pancreatic fluid collections. From January 2007 to May 2010, 22 patients (18 M/4F; mean age 56.9) with infected pancreatic fluid collections (mean size, 13.2 cm) at two Italian centers were evaluated for EUS-GTD. In 20 of the 22 patients, EUS-GTD with CSEMS placement was indicated. Early complications occurred in two patients: one patient developed a superinfection, which was managed conservatively, and one experienced stent migration and superinfection, and was managed surgically. The CSEMSs were removed without difficulty in 18 patients after a median of 26 days, while stent removal failed in one patient due to inflammatory tissue ingrowth; instead it was removed during surgery performed for renal cancer. Clinical success was achieved without additional intervention in 17 patients during a mean follow-up of 610 days; only one symptomatic recurrence was observed. In our experience, EUS-GTD with CSEMS placement appears safe for the treatment of infected pancreatic fluid collections.
Asunto(s)
Drenaje/instrumentación , Drenaje/métodos , Exudados y Transudados/diagnóstico por imagen , Seudoquiste Pancreático/terapia , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Stents , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Remoción de Dispositivos , Endosonografía/métodos , Seguridad de Equipos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seudoquiste Pancreático/complicaciones , Stents/efectos adversos , Sobreinfección/etiología , Terapia Asistida por Computador , Ultrasonografía DopplerRESUMEN
Since its development in the 1980s, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has undergone a great deal of technological modifications. EUS has become an important tool in the evaluation of patients with various clinical disorders and is increasingly being utilized in many centers. EUS has been evolving over the years; EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for cytological and/or histological diagnosis has become standard practice and a wide array of interventional and therapeutic procedures are performed under EUS guidance for diseases which otherwise would have needed surgery, with its associated morbidities. EUS shares the risks and complications of other endoscopic procedures. This article addresses the specific adverse effects and risks associated with EUS, EUS-FNA and interventional EUS, namely perforation, bleeding, pancreatitis and infection. Measures to help minimizing these risks will also be discussed.
Asunto(s)
Endosonografía/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Biopsia con Aguja Fina/efectos adversos , Endosonografía/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/etiología , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/prevención & control , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/prevención & control , Siembra Neoplásica , Conductos Pancreáticos/lesiones , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/prevención & control , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodosRESUMEN
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been developed as an alternative drainage technique in patients with obstructive jaundice where endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has failed. Between July 2008 and December 2009, 16 patients (9 men; median age 79 years) with biliopancreatic malignancy, who were candidates for alternative techniques of biliary decompression because ERCP had been unsuccessful, underwent EUS-BD with placement of a transmural or transpapillary partially covered nitinol self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). EUS-assisted cholangiography was successful in all patients, with definition of the relevant anatomy, but biliary drainage was successfully performed in only 12 (75â%) of the 16 patients (9 choledochoduodenostomies with SEMS placement and 3 biliary rendezvous procedures with papillary SEMS placement), with regression of the cholestasis. No major complications and no procedure-related deaths occurred. There was one case of pneumoperitoneum which was managed conservatively. The median follow-up was 170 days. During the follow-up, eight patients of the 12 patients in whom biliary draining was successful died; four are currently alive. None of the patients required endoscopic reintervention. This series demonstrated that EUS-BD with a partially covered SEMS has a high rate of clinical success and low complication rates, and could represent an alternative choice for biliary decompression.
Asunto(s)
Colestasis/terapia , Drenaje/métodos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/complicaciones , Cateterismo , Colestasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Colestasis/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) insertion as a bridge to surgery (BTS) in patients presenting with acute left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction (LCCO). METHODS: All patients with acute LCCO who underwent endoscopic SEMS placement as a BTS between January 2005 and December 2010 were reviewed and included in the study. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (19M and 17F; mean age 68.5) were included. The most frequent location was the sigmoid colon (47.2%). Technical success was achieved in 91.6% and clinical success in 88.9%. Technical failure was related to the location of the stricture at the rectosigmoid junction (P=0.03). There were four SEMS-related complications: one fecal obstruction, one haemorrhage treated with APC and two silent perforations which were noted during surgical resection. The mean time between SEMS insertion and surgical treatment was 19 days (range 6-80 days) and the most frequent intervention was a left hemicolectomy (46.9%). No intraoperative mortality and morbidity, or postoperative mortality were observed. The postoperative morbidity rate was 18.8% (two wound infections, one deep venous thrombosis, one case of pneumonia and one anastomotic dehiscence). Finally, after discharge from hospital, a total of 29 patients (90%) were stoma free. At the end of the follow-up period, 24 patients are still alive and the mean survival rate was 37.3±18 months (range 9-72). CONCLUSION: In our experience, SEMS placement as a BTS is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of patients with acute LCCO.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Stents , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía/métodos , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/terapia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Recto/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Colon Sigmoide/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Stents/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Colangitis/etiología , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B/diagnóstico , Pancreatitis/etiología , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Conducto Colédoco/patología , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/diagnóstico por imagen , Constricción Patológica , Endosonografía , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B/complicaciones , Linfoma de Células B/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XAsunto(s)
Fístula Bronquial/terapia , Endoscopía , Fístula Esofágica/terapia , Enfermedades del Mediastino/terapia , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Fístula Bronquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Bronquial/etiología , Fístula Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Esofágica/etiología , Humanos , Enfermedades del Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Mediastino/etiología , Radiografía , Instrumentos QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
Endosonography is an imaging technique based on the unification of ultrasonography and edoscopy. EUS became part of clinical practice at the beginning of the 80s due to its superior capacity to study the pancreas with respect to abdominal ultrasound. In recent years, there is a growing interest in EUS as shown by the number of scientific articles and changing clinical practice regarding diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms (bile duct stones, cancer staging) and palliation.