Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Spine J ; 11(2): 153-7, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21296300

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Traumatic pneumorrhachis (PR) is a rare entity, consisting of air within the spinal canal. It can be classified as epidural or subarachnoid, identifying the anatomical space where the air is located, and is associated with different etiologies, pathology, and treatments. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review of the scientific literature focused on the etiology, pathomechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of PR, and to report a case of an asymptomatic epidural type. STUDY DESIGN: International medical literature has been reviewed systematically for the term "traumatic pneumorrhachis" and appropriate related subject headings, such as traumatic intraspinal air, traumatic intraspinal pneumocele, traumatic spinal pneumatosis, traumatic spinal emphysema, traumatic aerorachia, traumatic pneumosaccus, and traumatic air myelogram. All cases that were identified were evaluated concerning their etiology, pathomechanism, and possible complications. SAMPLES: Studies that included one of the aforementioned terms in their titles. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify, evaluate, and summarize the literature related to the term "traumatic pneumorrhachis" and related headings. Furthermore, we report a rare case of an asymptomatic epidural PR extending to the cervical and thoracic spinal canal. We present the current data regarding the etiology, pathomechanism, diagnosis, and treatment modalities of patients with PR. RESULTS: The literature review included 37 related articles that reported 44 cases of traumatic PR. Only isolated case reports and series of no more than three cases were found. In 21 cases, the air was located in the epidural space, and in 23 cases, it was in the subarachnoid space. Most of the cases were localized to a specific spinal region. However, eight cases extending to more than one spinal region have been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic PR is an asymptomatic rare clinical entity and often is underdiagnosed. It usually resolves by itself without specific treatment. We stress the significance of this information to trauma specialists, so that they may better differentiate between epidural and subarachnoid PR. This is of great significance because subarachnoid PR is a marker of severe injury. The management of traumatic PR has to be individualized and frequently requires multidisciplinary treatment, involving head, chest, and/or abdomen intervention.


Asunto(s)
Enfisema/diagnóstico , Enfisema/etiología , Enfisema/terapia , Canal Medular/patología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Espacio Epidural/diagnóstico por imagen , Espacio Epidural/patología , Humanos , Radiografía , Canal Medular/diagnóstico por imagen , Espacio Subaracnoideo/diagnóstico por imagen , Espacio Subaracnoideo/patología
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 185(8): 500-5, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19652932

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: :Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a frequent complication following total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined radiotherapy and indomethacin as compared to indomethacin alone for the prevention of HO after hip arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 96 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive either a single dose of postoperative radiotherapy of 7.0 Gy and indomethacin for the first 15 postoperative days or indomethacin alone for the same period. A historical group of 50 patients that received indomethacin alone served as control. Primary endpoint was the radiographic evidence of HO at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of factors related to HO development, side effects from each treatment, and group differences in the clinical assessment with the Merle d'Aubigné Score. RESULTS: Four patients in the combined-therapy group developed HO compared to 13 patients in the indomethacin group (p < 0.05) and 13 patients in the historical group (p < 0.05). One patient each in the combined group and the historical group developed Brooker III HO (nonsignificant difference). Duration of surgery and congenital hip disease were associated with HO development in the indomethacin groups, while age and congenital hip disease showed such an association in the combined-therapy group. The side effects and mean Merle d'Aubigné Score did not differ significantly between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Combined radiotherapy and indomethacin was more efficacious in preventing HO after total hip arthroplasty compared to indomethacin alone and should be considered for future investigation.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Indometacina/uso terapéutico , Osificación Heterotópica/prevención & control , Osificación Heterotópica/radioterapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osificación Heterotópica/etiología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA