Impact of nitrous oxide use on parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Nitrous oxide affects memory and recall. We aimed to determine if using nitrous oxide during labor affected patients' ability to learn and recall the risks and benefits of neuraxial analgesia. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective cohort study. SETTING: Labor and delivery unit in a large academic medical center. PATIENTS: Nulliparous patients with spontaneous or planned induction of labor. INTERVENTIONS: Parturients chose whether to use nitrous oxide during labor. At the discussion for epidural consent, 4 risks were described: headache, infection, nerve damage, bleeding. MEASUREMENTS: Labor pain score, time from nitrous oxide discontinuation, and cervical dilation were documented at the discussion of epidural risks. Patients were assessed for unprompted recall and prompted recall of epidural risks on postpartum day 1 and unprompted recall at postpartum week 6. The number and proportion of patients who indicated each true risk (unprompted and prompted recall) or distractor (prompted recall only) were summarized by treatment group and results compared using Pearson χ2 tests. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 403 enrolled patients, 294 (73%) did not use nitrous oxide, and 109 (27%) did. The 2 groups were similar except women who used nitrous oxide were more likely to be cared for by midwives and had higher pain scores at their epidural request. Scores for unprompted or prompted recall of epidural risks were not different between women who received or did not receive nitrous oxide. All 4 risks were recalled unprompted by only 3% in the nitrous oxide group and by 6% in the group not receiving nitrous oxide (P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: The use of nitrous oxide for labor analgesia does not adversely influence a parturient's ability to recall the risks of epidural placement. Patients who receive nitrous oxide for labor analgesia should be considered eligible to provide consent for subsequent procedures.

Effect of an oxytocin protocol on secondary uterotonic use in patients undergoing Cesarean delivery.

PURPOSE: Protocol-driven oxytocin regimens can reduce oxytocin administration compared with a nonprotocol free-flow continuous infusion. Our aim was to compare secondary uterotonic use between a modified "rule of threes" oxytocin protocol and a free-flow continuous oxytocin infusion after Cesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective before-and-after study to compare patients who underwent Cesarean delivery between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013 (preprotocol) with patients who underwent Cesarean delivery between 1 January 2015 and 31 August 2017 (postprotocol). The preprotocol group received free-flow oxytocin administration and the postprotocol group received oxytocin according to a modified rule of threes algorithm. The primary outcome was secondary uterotonic use and the secondary outcomes included blood transfusion, hemoglobin value < 8 g·dL-1, and estimated blood loss. RESULTS: In total, 4,010 Cesarean deliveries were performed in 3,637 patients (2,262 preprotocol and 1,748 postprotocol). The odds of receiving secondary uterotonic drugs were increased in the postprotocol group (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.70; P = 0.02). Patients in the postprotocol group were less likely to receive a blood transfusion. Nevertheless, the two groups were similar for the composite end point of transfusion or hemoglobin < 8 g·dL-1 (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.11; P = 0.25). The odds of an estimated blood loss greater than 1,000 mL were reduced in the postprotocol group (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the modified rule of threes oxytocin protocol group were more likely to receive a secondary uterotonic than those in the preprotocol group. Estimated blood loss and transfusion outcomes were similar.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les schémas thérapeutiques d'ocytocine basés sur un protocole peuvent réduire l'administration d'ocytocine par rapport à une perfusion continue en débit libre hors protocole. Notre objectif était de comparer l'utilisation secondaires d'agents utérotoniques entre un protocole modifié d'ocytocine en « règle de trois ¼ et une perfusion continue d'ocytocine à débit libre après un accouchement par césarienne. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude rétrospective avant-après pour comparer les personnes ayant bénéficié d'une césarienne entre le 1er janvier 2010 et le 31 décembre 2013 (pré-protocole) avec les personnes ayant subi une césarienne entre le 1er janvier 2015 et le 31 août 2017 (post-protocole). Le groupe pré-protocole a reçu une administration d'ocytocine en débit libre et le groupe post-protocole a reçu de l'ocytocine selon un algorithme de règle de trois modifié. Le critère d'évaluation principal était l'utilisation secondaire d'agents utérotoniques et les critères d'évaluation secondaires incluaient la transfusion sanguine, un indice d'hémoglobine < 8 g·dL­1 et les pertes de sang estimées. RéSULTATS: Au total, 4010 accouchements par césarienne ont été réalisés chez 3637 patient·es (2262 pré-protocole et 1748 post-protocole). Les chances de recevoir des médicaments utérotoniques secondaires étaient plus élevées dans le groupe post-protocole (rapport de cotes [RC], 1,33; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1,04 à 1,70; P = 0,02). Les patient·es du groupe post-protocole étaient moins susceptibles de recevoir une transfusion sanguine. Néanmoins, les deux groupes étaient similaires en ce qui touchait au critère d'évaluation composite de transfusion ou d'hémoglobine < 8 g·dL­1 (RC, 0,86; IC 95, 0,66 à 1,11; P = 0,25). Les risques d'une perte de sang estimée supérieure à 1000 mL ont été réduits dans le groupe post-protocole (RC, 0,64; IC 95 %, 0,50 à 0,84; P = 0,001). CONCLUSION: Les patient·es du groupe du protocole d'ocytocine en règle de trois modifiée étaient plus susceptibles de recevoir un utérotonique secondaire que les personnes du groupe pré-protocole. Les pertes sanguines estimées et les résultats transfusionnels étaient similaires.

Focal-occult placenta accreta: a clandestine source of maternal morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum is known to cause adverse obstetrical morbidity outcomes, however, direct comparisons with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum morbidity are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the baseline characteristics, surgical and obstetrical morbidity, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes of patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum with those of patients with previa-associated accreta. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was conducted of all pathologically confirmed placenta accreta spectrum cases from 2018 to 2022 at a tertiary care center. The baseline characteristics, surgical, obstetrical, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were recorded. Cases of focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum was compared with cases of previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum across a range of morbidity characteristics including hemorrhagic factors, interventions, postdelivery reoperations, infections, and intensive care unit admission. Statistical comparison was performed using Kruskal-Wallis or chi-square tests, and a P value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 74 cases were identified with 43 focal-occult and 31 previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum cases. Of those, 25.6% of the patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum and 100% of the patients with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum underwent a hysterectomy. One case of focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum and 29 cases of previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum were diagnosed antenatally. Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum did not differ from those with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum in mean maternal age (33.0 vs 33.1 years), body mass index, or the incidence of previous dilation and curettage procedures (16.3% vs 25.8%). Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum were significantly more likely to have a lower mean parity (1.5 vs 3.6 gestations), higher gestational age at delivery (36.1 vs 33.9 weeks' gestation), and were less likely to have had a previous cesarean delivery (12/43, 27.9% vs 30/31, 96.8%). In addition, patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum had less previous cesarean deliveries (mean, 0.5 vs 2.3), were more likely to have undergone in vitro fertilization (20.9% vs 3.2%), and less likely to have anterior placentation. When contrasting the clinical outcomes of patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum with those with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, the postpartum hemorrhage rates (71.0% vs 67.4%), mean quantitative blood loss (2099 mL; range, 500-9516 mL vs 2119 mL; range 350-12,220 mL), mean units of red blood cells transfused (1.4 vs 1.7), massive transfusion rate (9.3% vs 3.2%), and intensive care unit admission rates (11.6% vs 6.5%) were not significantly different, but there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher morbidity among patients with focal-occult accreta. Patients with focal-occult accreta had a higher incidence of reoperations or return to the operating room (30.2 vs 6.5%; P=.01). When comparing focal-occult with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, the composite outcomes, including hemorrhagic morbidity (77.4% vs 74.4%), any maternal morbidity (83.9% vs 76.7%), and severe maternal morbidity (64.5% vs 65.1%), were not significantly different between the groups. Nine focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum patients had a subsequent pregnancy, and 3 of those had recurrent placenta accreta spectrum. CONCLUSION: Focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum presents with fewer identifiable risk factors than placenta previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum but may be associated with an in vitro fertilization pregnancy. Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum was observed to have a higher incidence of reoperation when compared with patients previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, and no other statistically significant differences in morbidity outcomes were observed. The absence of differences in morbidity outcomes may be attributable to a lack of antenatal detection of focal-occult accreta and merits further investigation.