Foot kinematics as a function of ground orientation and weightbearing.

The foot is responsible for the bodyweight transfer to the ground, while adapting to different terrains and activities. Despite this fundamental role, the knowledge about the foot bone intrinsic kinematics is still limited. The aim of the study is to provide a quantitative and systematic description of the kinematics of all bones in the foot, considering the full range of dorsi/plantar flexion and pronation/supination of the foot, both in weightbearing and nonweightbearing conditions. Bone kinematics was accurately reconstructed for three specimens from a series of computed tomography scans taken in weightbearing configuration. The ground inclination was imposed through a set of wedges, varying the foot orientation both in the sagittal and coronal planes; the donor body-weight was applied or removed by a cable-rig. A total of 32 scans for each foot were acquired and segmented. Bone kinematics was expressed in terms of anatomical reference systems optimized for the foot kinematic description. Results agree with previous literature where available. However, our analysis reveals that bones such as calcaneus, navicular, intermediate cuneiform, fourth and fifth metatarsal move more during foot pronation than flexion. Weightbearing significantly increase the range of motion of almost all the bone. Cuneiform and metatarsal move more due to weightbearing than in response to ground inclination, showing their role in the load-acceptance phase. The data here reported represent a step toward a deeper understanding of the foot behavior, that may help in the definition of better treatment and medical devices, as well as new biomechanical model of the foot.

New anatomical reference systems for the bones of the foot and ankle complex: definitions and exploitation on clinical conditions.

BACKGROUND: A complete definition of anatomical reference systems (ARS) for all bones of the foot and ankle complex is lacking. Using a morphological approach, we propose new ARS for these bones with the aim of being highly repeatable, consistent among individuals, clinically interpretable, and also suited for a sound kinematic description. METHODS: Three specimens from healthy donors and three patients with flat feet were scanned in weight-bearing CT. The foot bones were segmented and ARS defined according to the proposed approach. To assess repeatability, intra class coefficients (ICC) were computed both intra- and inter-operator. Consistency was evaluated as the mean of the standard deviations of the ARS position and orientation, both within normal and flat feet. Clinical interpretability was evaluated by providing a quantification of the curvature variation in the medial-longitudinal and transverse arches and computing the Djiann-Annonier angle for normal and flat feet from these new ARS axes. To test the capability to also provide a sound description of the foot kinematics, the alignment between mean helical axes (MHA) and ARS axes was quantified. RESULTS: ICC was 0.99 both inter- and intra-operator. Rotational consistency was 4.7 ± 3.5 ° and 6.2 ± 4.4° for the normal and flat feet, respectively; translational consistency was 4.4 ± 4.0 mm and 5.4 ± 2.9 mm for the normal and flat feet, respectively. In both these cases, the consistency was better than what was achieved by using principal axes of inertia. Curvature variation in the arches were well described and the measurements of the Djiann-Annoier angles from both normal and flat feet matched corresponding clinical observations. The angle between tibio-talar MHA and ARS mediolateral axis in the talus was 12.3 ± 6.0, while the angle between talo-calcaneal MHA and ARS anteroposterior axis in the calcaneus was 17.2 ± 5.6, suggesting good capability to represent joint kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ARS definitions are robust and provide a solid base for the 3-dimensional description of posture and motion of the foot and ankle complex from medical imaging.

Quantification of the errors associated with marker occlusion in stereophotogrammetric systems and implications on gait analysis.

Optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric systems (OSSs) represent the standard for gait analysis. Despite widespread, their reported accuracy in nominal working conditions shows a variability of several orders of magnitude, ranging from few microns to several millimetres. No clear explanation for this variability has been provided yet. We hypothesized that this reflects an error affecting OSS outcomes when some of the tracked markers are totally or partially occluded. The aim of this paper is to quantify this error in static and dynamic conditions, also distinguishing between total and partial marker occlusion. A Vicon system featuring 8 cameras is employed in this study. Two camera distributions, one designed to maximize OSS accuracy and another one representative of a typical gait setup, are investigated. For both the setups, static and dynamic tests are performed, evaluating the different impact of partial and total marker occlusions. Marker occlusions significantly affected the system performances. The maximum measure variation reached 1.86 mm and 7.20 mm in static and dynamic conditions, respectively, both obtained in the case of partial occlusion. This systematic source of error is likely to affect gait measures: markers placed on the patient body are often visible only by half of the cameras, with swinging arms and legs providing moving occlusions. The maximum error observed in this study can potentially affect the kinematics outcomes of conventional gait models, particularly on frontal and coronal plane, and consequently the peak muscle forces estimated with musculoskeletal models.