Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 83
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 50(3): 211-219, 2022 03.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063688

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To provide clinical practice guidelines about fertility preservation (FP) for women with benign gynecologic disease (BGD) developed by a modified Delphi consensus process for oocyte vitrification in women with benign gynecologic disease. METHODS: A steering committee composed of 14 healthcare professionals and a patient representative with lived experience of endometriosis identified 42 potential practices related to FP for BGD. Then 114 key stakeholders including various healthcare professionals (n=108) and patient representatives (n=6) were asked to participate in a modified Delphi process via two online survey rounds from February to September 2020 and a final meeting. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this final meeting to reach consensus was held as a videoconference in November 2020. RESULTS: Survey response of stakeholders was 75 % (86/114) for round 1 and 87 % (75/86) for round 2. Consensus was reached for the recommendations for 28 items, that have been distributed into five general categories: (i) Information to provide to women of reproductive age with a BGD, (ii) Technical aspects of FP for BGD, (iii) Indications for FP in endometriosis, (iv) Indications for FP for non-endometriosis BGD, (v) Indications for FP after a fortuitous diagnosis of an idiopathic diminished ovarian reserve. CONCLUSION: These guidelines provide some practice advice to help health professionals better inform women about the possibilities of cryopreserving their oocytes prior to the management of a BGD that may affect their ovarian reserve and fertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The CNGOF (Collège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français) funded the implementation of the Delphi process.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Endometriosis , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Oocitos/fisiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitrificación
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 242: 56-62, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563819

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Endometriosis affects 10% of women in reproductive age and alters fertility. Its management is still debated notably the timing of surgery and ART in infertility. Several tools have been created to guide the practitioner and the couple yet many limitations persist. The objective is to create a nomogram to predict the likelihood of a live birth after surgery followed by assisted reproductive technology (ART) for patients with endometriosis-related infertility. STUDY DESIGN: All women in a public university hospital who attempted to conceive by ART after surgery for endometriosis-related infertility from 2004 to 2016 were included. We created a model using multivariable linear regression based on a retrospective database. RESULT: Of the 297 women included, 171 (57.6%) obtained a live birth. Age, duration of infertility, number of ICSI-IVF cycles, ovarian reserve and the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) score were included in the nomogram. The predictive model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75-0.79) and was well calibrated. The external validation of the model was achieved with an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.73) and calibration was good. The staging accuracy according to AUC criteria for the nomogram compared to the currently used Endometriosis Infertility Index to predict live births were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75-0.79) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.57-0.63), respectively. CONCLUSION: This simple tool appears to accurately predict the likelihood of a live birth for a patient undergoing ART after surgery for endometriosis-related infertility. It could be used to counsel patients in their choice between spontaneous versus ART conception, or oocyte donation.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Nacimiento Vivo , Nomogramas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
4.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 47(7): 265-274, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29920379

RESUMEN

First-line diagnostic investigations for endometriosis are physical examination and pelvic ultrasound. The second-line investigations are: targeted pelvic examination performed by an expert clinician, transvaginal ultrasound performed by an expert physician sonographer (radiologist or gynaecologist), and pelvic MRI. Management of endometriosis is recommended when the disease has a functional impact. Recommended first-line hormonal therapies for the management of endometriosis-related pain are combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) or the 52mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS). There is no evidence base on which to recommend systematic preoperative hormonal therapy solely to prevent surgical complications or facilitate surgery. After surgery for endometriosis, a CHC or 52mg levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is recommended as first-line treatment when pregnancy is not desired. In the event of failure of the initial treatment, recurrence, or multiorgan involvement, a multidisciplinary team meeting is recommended, involving physicians, surgeons and other professionals. A laparoscopic approach is recommended for surgical treatment of endometriosis. HRT can be offered to postmenopausal women who have undergone surgical treatment for endometriosis. Antigonadotrophic hormonal therapy is not recommended for patients with endometriosis and infertility to increase the chances of spontaneous pregnancy, including postoperatively. Fertility preservation options must be discussed with patients undergoing surgery for ovarian endometriomas.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ginecología , Obstetricia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Francia , Ginecología/normas , Humanos , Obstetricia/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas
5.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 46(3): 144-155, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29550339

RESUMEN

First-line investigations to diagnose endometriosis are clinical examination and pelvic ultrasound. Second-line investigations include pelvic examination performed by a referent clinician, transvaginal ultrasound performed by a referent echographist, and pelvic MRI. It is recommended to treat endometriosis when it is symptomatic. First-line hormonal treatments recommended for the management of painful endometriosis are combined with hormonal contraceptives or levonorgestrel 52mg IUD. There is no evidence to recommend systematic preoperative hormonal therapy for the unique purpose of preventing the risk of surgical complications or facilitating surgery. After endometriosis surgery, combined hormonal contraceptives or levonorgestrel SIU 52mg are recommended as first-line therapy in the absence of desire of pregnancy. In case of initial treatment failure, recurrence, or multiple organ involvement by endometriosis, medico-surgical and multidisciplinary discussion is recommended. The laparoscopic approach is recommended for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. HRT may be offered in postmenopausal women operated for endometriosis. In case of infertility related to endometriosis, it is not recommended to prescribe anti-gonadotropic hormone therapy to increase the rate of spontaneous pregnancy, including postoperatively. The possibilities of fertility preservation should be discussed with the patient in case of surgery for ovarian endometrioma.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/terapia , Terapias Complementarias , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Femenino , Examen Ginecologíco , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/etiología
6.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 46(3): 357-367, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29544710

RESUMEN

Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is a severe form of the disease, defined by endometriotic tissue peritoneal infiltration. The disease may involve the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligaments, digestive tract or bladder. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is responsible for disabling pain and infertility. The purpose of these recommendations is to answer the following question: in case of deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility, what is the best therapeutic strategy? First-line surgery and then in vitro fertilization (IVF) in case of persistent infertility or first-line IVF, without surgery? After exhaustive literature analysis, we suggest the following recommendations: studies focusing on spontaneous fertility of infertile patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis found spontaneous pregnancy rates about 10%. Treatment should be considered in infertile women with deeply infiltrating endometriosis when they wish to conceive. First-line IVF is a good option in case of no operated deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility. Pregnancy rates (spontaneous and following assisted reproductive techniques) after surgery (deep lesions without colorectal involvement) varie from 40 to 85%. After colorectal endometriosis resection, pregnancy rates vary from 47 to 59%. The studies comparing the pregnancy rates after IVF, whether or not preceded by surgery, are contradictory and do not allow, to date, to conclude on the interest of any surgical management of deep lesions before IVF. In case of alteration of ovarian reserve parameters (age, AMH, antral follicle count), there is no argument to recommend first-line surgery or IVF. The study of the literature does not identify any prognostic factors, allowing to chose between surgical management or IVF. The use of IVF in the indication "deep infiltrating endometriosis" allows satisfactory pregnancy rates without significant risk, regarding disease progression or oocyte retrieval procedure morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/etiología , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Reserva Ovárica , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas
7.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 46(3): 368-372, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29530556

RESUMEN

Fertility preservation (FP) techniques are progressing rapidly these past few years thanks to the oocyte vitrification. Indication of FP techniques is now extended to non-oncological situation that may induce risk of premature ovarian failure. Ovarian endometriosis can lead to premature ovarian failure and further infertility due to the high risk of ovarian cysts recurrence and surgery. To date, there is no cohort study regarding FP and endometriosis as well as no recommendation. Our purpose is to review the arguments in favor of FP in this specific area and to elaborate strategies according to each clinical form.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/terapia , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Reserva Ovárica
8.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 46(3): 373-375, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29503237

RESUMEN

The management of endometriosis related infertility requires a global approach. In this context, the prescription of an anti-gonadotropic hormonal treatment does not increase the rate of non-ART (assisted reproductive technologies) pregnancies and it is not recommended. In case of endometriosis related infertility, the results of IVF management in terms of pregnancy and birth rates are not negatively affected by the existence of endometriosis. Controlled ovarian stimulation during IVF does not increase the risk of endometriosis associated symptoms worsening, nor accelerate the intrinsic progression of endometriosis and does not increase the rate of recurrence. However, in the context of IVF management for women with endometriosis, pre-treatment with GnRH agonist or with oestrogen/progestin contraception improve IVF outcomes. There is currently no evidence of a positive or negative effect of endometriosis surgery on IVF outcomes. Information on the possibilities of preserving fertility should be considered, especially before surgery.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología
9.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 219: 28-34, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29035799

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To perform a prospective evaluation of postoperative fertility management using the endometriosis fertility index (EFI). STUDY: This prospective non-interventional observational study was performed from January 2013 to February 2016 in a tertiary care university hospital and an assisted reproductive technology (ART) centre. In total, 196 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis-related infertility. Indications for surgery included pelvic pain (dysmenorrhoea, and/or deep dyspareunia), abnormal hysterosalpingogram, and failure to conceive after three or more superovulation cycles with or without intra-uterine insemination. Multidisciplinary fertility management followed the surgical diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Three postoperative options were proposed to couples based on the EFI score: EFI score ≤4, ART (Option 1); EFI score 5-6, non-ART management for 4-6 months followed by ART (Option 2); or EFI score ≥7, non-ART management for 6-9 months followed by ART (Option 3). The main outcomes were non-ART pregnancy rates and cumulative pregnancy rates according to EFI score. Univariate and multivariate analyses with backward stepwise logistic regression were used to explain the occurrence of non-ART pregnancy after surgery for women with EFI scores ≥5. Adjustment was made for potential confounding variables that were significant (p<0.05) or tending towards significance (p<0.1) on univariate analysis. RESULTS: The cumulative pregnancy rate was 76%. The total number of women and pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were: 26 and 42.3%; 56 and 67.9%; and 114 and 87.7%, respectively. The non-ART pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were 0%, 30.5% and 48.2%, respectively. The ART pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were 50%, 60.6% and 80.3%, respectively. The mean time to conceive for non-ART pregnancies was 4.2 months. The benefit of ART was inversely correlated with the mean EFI score. On multivariate analysis, the EFI score was significantly associated with non-ART pregnancy (odds ratio 1.629, 95% confidence interval 1.235-2.150). CONCLUSION: In daily prospective practice, the EFI was useful for subsequent postoperative fertility management in infertile patients with endometriosis.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 217: 126-130, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28892762

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: high maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality levels have been associated with uterine ruptures. The aims of our study were to determine risk factors and signs for maternal and fetal complications in patients with uterine rupture. STUDY DESIGN: retrospective, population-based study, in all Val d'Oise public obstetrics departments, France, between 2000 and 2015. All patients with uterine rupture were analyzed using medical records. To identify risk factors and signs for maternal and fetal complications, patients were divided into two groups according to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes or not, and compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 126 patients with complete uterine rupture were identified. In all, 74 (58.7%) had maternal and fetal complications, and these were more frequently observed in patients with unscarred uterus (N=18; p<0.001 and OR 5.52, 95% CI 2.09-14.55), lateral injured uterus (N=21; p<0.001), after labour induction (N=21, p=0.01 and OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.22-13.53), and when a sudden onset of abdominal pain, in patients with previous successful epidural analgesia, occurred (75.9% vs 39.2%, p<0.001 and OR 4.88, 95% CI 1.9-12.13). CONCLUSION: Unscarred and lateral ruptures of uterus were associated with maternal vascular injuries, and higher maternal and fetal complications. Sudden onset of abdominal pain in woman with previous successful epidural analgesia might be predictive of complicated uterine rupture.


Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Rotura Uterina/diagnóstico , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea/efectos adversos , Adulto , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Esfuerzo de Parto , Rotura Uterina/etiología
11.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 211: 182-187, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28288431

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the predictive factors for non-ART pregnancy in infertile women after laparoscopic diagnosis and surgery for isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study from January-2004 to December-2015 in a tertiary care university hospital and Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) centre. Infertile women with laparoscopic surgery for SUP (with histologic diagnosis) were included. The surgical treatment was followed by spontaneous fertility or post-operative ovarian stimulation (pOS) using superovulation (gonadotrophins)±Intra Uterine Insemination (IUI). The main outcomes were the non-ART clinical pregnancy rates and its predictive factors. RESULT(S): Over the period study, 315 women were included. Of these, 133 (42.3%) women had non-ART pregnancy. The mean time to conceive was 6 months (±6days). Univariate analysis for non-ART pregnancy after surgery showed that: (i) no difference was observed according to age, length of infertility, Body Mass Index (BMI), the rate of previous pregnancy, and the pre-operative ovarian stimulation rate; (ii) diminished ovarian reserve and previous miscarriage were higher in the non-pregnant women group (8.3 versus 19.1%, p<0.05; 3.5% versus 9%, p=0.06, respectively); (iii) the mean EFI score and pOS were higher in pregnant women (7.7 versus 7.2, p=0.02; 49.2% versus 26.7%, p<0.01); and (iv) IUI did not show any benefit for pregnancy (22% after superovulation versus 27.2% after superovulation and IUI). In the multivariate analysis, only pOS (adjusted OR 2.504, 95% CI [1.537-4.077]) and DOR (aOR 0.420, 95% CI [0.198-0.891]) remained significantly associated with the incidence of pregnancy. CONCLUSION(S): After laparoscopic surgery for peritoneal superficial endometriosis related infertility, ovarian stimulation improved pregnancy rate, while diminished ovarian reserve had a worse prognosis for pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Enfermedades Peritoneales/complicaciones , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Adulto , Femenino , Fertilidad , Humanos , Reserva Ovárica , Inducción de la Ovulación , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 44(5): 280-4, 2016 May.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26968255

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Oocyte vitrification using an open device is thought to be a source of microbiological and chemical contaminations that can be avoided using a closed device. The principal purpose of this study was to compare the two vitrification protocols: closed and open system. The secondary aim was to study the effects of the storage in the vapor phase of nitrogen (VPN) on oocytes vitrified using an open system and to compare it to those of a storage in liquid nitrogen (LN). METHODS: Forty-four patients have been included in our study between November 2014 and May 2015. Two hundred and fourteen oocytes have been vitrified at germinal vesicle (GV), metaphase I (0PB) and metaphase II (1PB) stages. We vitrified 96 oocytes (59 GV/37 0PB) using a closed vitrification device and 118 oocytes (57 GV/31 0PB/30 1PB) using an open device. The vitrified oocytes were then stored either in LN or in VPN. The main outcome measures were the survival rate after warming (SR), meiosis resumption rate (MRR) and maturation rate (MR). RESULTS: The global post-thaw SR was significantly higher for oocytes vitrified using an open system (93.2%) compared to those vitrified using a closed one (64.5%; P<0.001). On the contrary, there was no significant difference in terms of global MRR and MR (82.1% vs. 87.5% and 60.7% vs. 61.2% using closed and open system respectively). The SR, MRR and the MR were not significantly different when vitrified oocytes were stored in VPN or LN (91.6, 83.8, 64.5% vs. 93.9, 89.8, 59.1% respectively). CONCLUSION: Taking into account the limits of our protocol, the open vitrification system remains the more efficient system. The use of sterile liquid nitrogen for oocyte vitrification and the subsequent storage in vapor phase of nitrogen could minimize the hypothetical risks of biological and chemical contaminations.


Asunto(s)
Criopreservación/instrumentación , Criopreservación/métodos , Oocitos/fisiología , Adulto , Supervivencia Celular , Femenino , Calor , Humanos , Meiosis , Metafase , Nitrógeno , Estudios Prospectivos
16.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 44(3): 163-7, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908149

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare embryo development cultured in two single-step media commercially available: Fert/Sage One Step® (Origio) and Continuous Single Culture® (CSC) (Irvine Scientific). METHODS: A prospective auto-controlled study of sibling oocytes from women undergoing conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed in our center from February to June 2015. After fertilization, for every patient, half of oocytes were cultured in the single-step Fert/Sage One Step® (serie SAGE) and the other half in the single-step CSC®(serie CSC). Fertilization and embryo morphology rates were assessed by day 1 to day 5-6 if needed. Embryo presenting<20% of fragmentation and 4 cells at day 2, 8 cells at day 3 were qualified as "top quality". Embryo with<20% of fragmentation and 3-5 cells at day 2, 6-10 cells at day 3 were qualified as "good quality". Blastocyst B3, B4, B5 with A or B inner cell mass and A or B trophectoderm were qualified as "good quality". Transferred or frozen embryos were qualified as useful embryos. RESULTS: Sixty-two attempts of IVF and 133 of ICSI were analyzed, corresponding to 2059 inseminated or micro-injected oocytes. Fertilization rate were not different between the 2 series, respectively SAGE vs CSC (IVF: 73.4% vs 68.3% [P=0.49]; ICSI: 58.9% vs 63.8% [P=0.12]). No difference was found for embryo morphology, respectively SAGE vs CSC, at day 2 (top quality embryo at day 2 IVF: 34.4% vs 33% [P=0.98]; ICSI: 42.4% vs 44.9% [P=0.37]; and good quality embryo at day 2 IVF: 44% vs 50.2% [P=0.07]; ICSI: 64% vs 71% [P=0.35]); no difference at day 3 (top quality embryo at day 3 IVF: 19.4% vs 21.3% [P=0.61]; ICSI: 28.7% vs 27.4% [P=0.54]; and good quality embryo at day 3 IVF: 40.4% vs 50.2% [P=0.91]; ICSI: 51% vs 47.6% [P=0.47]). Blastocyst development rate were not different, respectively SAGE vs CSC (IVF: 39.9% vs 41.5% [P=0.63] with 42.9% vs 42.2% of good quality blastocyst [P=0.70]; ICSI: 41.1% vs 37.8% [P=0.18] with 32.9% vs 40.8% of good quality blastocyst [P=0.13]). No difference was found in the useful embryo rate in the 2 series SAGE vs CSC (IVF: 52.8% vs 55.2% [P=0.83]; ICSI: 62.4% vs 61.7% [P=0.70]). CONCLUSION: Embryo development and rate of useful embryos, transferred or frozen, were not different according to the embryo culture in single-step media Fert/Sage One Step® vs single-step Continuous Single Culture®.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Cultivo , Técnicas de Cultivo de Embriones/métodos , Desarrollo Embrionario , Oocitos/fisiología , Adulto , Blastocisto/fisiología , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas
17.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 44(1): 11-6, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26678164

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cornual pregnancy is a rare entity, representing 2% of ectopic pregnancies. Its management is poorly codified and often guided by the clinical situation. The aim of our study was to describe the management of cornual pregnancies, subsequent fertility, and obstetric outcomes according to the management. METHODS: Observational retrospective unicentric study. Nineteen patients hospitalized for cornual pregnancy between 2006 and 2015 were included. The data was collected with medical records and a phone standardized questionnaire. Patients were managed according to hemodynamic status by either systemic or local methotrexate injection or surgical corneal resection. RESULTS: Among the 19 patients, 32% (6) were treated by systemic injection (one failure treated by surgical treatment) and 68% (13) underwent surgical treatment by cornual resection. The median HCG rate decrease was 33 days (16-62). Among the twelve patients with a desire for a new pregnancy, 7 (58%) became pregnant without assisted reproductive technology (2 following medical treatment and 5 following surgical resection). Histological analysis of uterine horn showed proximal fallopian tube lesions in 76.9% of case (chronic salpingitis, endosalpingiosis and adenomyosis). CONCLUSION: Cornual pregnancies are at high risk of hemorrhagic rupture. Ectopic recidive may occur. Fertility and obstetrical outcomes following cornual pregnancy are not affected whatever the initial treatment. Other studies are needed to aid clinical management according to HCG level and ultrasound features.


Asunto(s)
Fertilidad , Embarazo Cornual/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo Cornual/cirugía , Abortivos no Esteroideos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 43(12): 806-9, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26597487

RESUMEN

The revised American Fertility Society classification system has been most used after surgery by all consensus on endometriosis fertility. However, it does not predict pregnancy. The EFI score has been recently developed to aim at predicting clinical pregnancy after surgery. Several study performed its external validation. It may be a useful new tool to counsel couples for personalized postoperative management.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/clasificación , Endometriosis/cirugía , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/clasificación , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medicina Reproductiva , Sociedades Médicas
19.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 43(9): 604-11, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26297160

RESUMEN

The use of laparoscopy in infertility is currently controversial. However, laparoscopic treatment of tubal and peritoneal disease, or endometriosis improves natural fecundity and ART results. The use of laparoscopy in unexplained infertility can be considered because of underestimated pelvic pathology. The result of laparoscopy may help the practitioner for choosing spontaneous pregnancy or ART postoperative management. Although there is a lack of randomized study, laparoscopy is useful for a high overall pregnancy rate (surgery and ART treatment). Rather than opposing ART and laparoscopy, the integrated approach seems better for personal management.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Laparoscopía , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Enfermedades Peritoneales/cirugía , Embarazo
20.
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol ; 2015: 451247, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26114001

RESUMEN

We report the case of a patient who developed gonococcal chorioamnionitis resulting in stillbirth at 28 + 4 weeks of pregancy. As this infection is rare and potentially serious, questions remain regarding occurrence and screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...