High frequency of gastrointestinal complaints, but insignificant prevalence of gluten-sensitive enteropathies in Brazilian fibromyalgia patients.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Coeliac disease (CD) and non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) cause symptoms like those seen in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and functional gastrointestinal disorders. There is no consistent data on frequency of these symptoms and no study performed duodenal biopsies to investigate CD/NCGS in Brazilian FM patients. Therefore, we sought to verify the prevalence of CD/NCGS in FM patients and the association between gastrointestinal manifestations and FM symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-two individuals with FM (ACR2010) were recruited from FM outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Clinical evaluation included the Widespread Pain Index (WPI), Severity Symptom Scale (SS), Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PDS), and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Subjects were screened for the presence of coeliac antibodies and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (duodenal biopsies) was performed for diagnosis of CD/NCGS. RESULTS: 46 (74.2%) women reported at least one digestive symptom: constipation, abdominal distension, loss of weight/inappetence, and nausea/vomiting. Fourteen (31.8%) presented macroscopic duodenitis and 2(4.5%) had duodenal lymphocytic infiltrates, but none met CD criteria. In 1(1.6%) patient NCGS was confirmed. There was association between presence of any digestive symptom and WPI and SS (fatigue, waking up tired, cognition), but no difference on FIQ between patients with and without gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal complaints were frequent and associated with increased degree of polysymptomatic distress in FM patients, but presence of these symptoms was not related to overall impact of FM over different dimensions of the patient's life. Moreover, the prevalence of CD/NCGS was very low. This suggests that screening for CD in Brazilian FM patients might not be cost-effective, since the frequency of CD/NCGS was very low.

High frequency of gastrointestinal complaints, but insignificant prevalence of gluten-sensitive enteropathies in Brazilian fibromyalgia patients / Alta frecuencia de molestias gastrointestinales, pero prevalencia insignificante de enteropatías sensibles al gluten en pacientes brasileños con fibromialgia

Introduction/Objectives: Coeliac disease (CD) and non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) cause symptoms like those seen in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and functional gastrointestinal disorders. There is no consistent data on frequency of these symptoms and no study performed duodenal biopsies to investigate CD/NCGS in Brazilian FM patients. Therefore, we sought to verify the prevalence of CD/NCGS in FM patients and the association between gastrointestinal manifestations and FM symptoms. Material and methods: Sixty-two individuals with FM (ACR2010) were recruited from FM outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Clinical evaluation included the Widespread Pain Index (WPI), Severity Symptom Scale (SS), Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PDS), and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Subjects were screened for the presence of coeliac antibodies and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (duodenal biopsies) was performed for diagnosis of CD/NCGS. Results: 46 (74.2%) women reported at least one digestive symptom: constipation, abdominal distension, loss of weight/inappetence, and nausea/vomiting. Fourteen (31.8%) presented macroscopic duodenitis and 2(4.5%) had duodenal lymphocytic infiltrates, but none met CD criteria. In 1(1.6%) patient NCGS was confirmed. There was association between presence of any digestive symptom and WPI and SS (fatigue, waking up tired, cognition), but no difference on FIQ between patients with and without gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion: Gastrointestinal complaints were frequent and associated with increased degree of polysymptomatic distress in FM patients, but presence of these symptoms was not related to overall impact of FM over different dimensions of the patient's life. Moreover, the prevalence of CD/NCGS was very low. This suggests that screening for CD in Brazilian FM patients might not be cost-effective, since the frequency of CD/NCGS was very low.(AU)

Introducción/Objetivos: La enfermedad celíaca (EC) y la sensibilidad al gluten no celíaca (SGNC) causan síntomas similares a los observados en pacientes con fibromialgia (FM) y trastornos gastrointestinales funcionales. Ningún estudio realizó biopsias duodenales para investigar EC/SGNC en pacientes brasileños con FM. Por lo tanto, buscamos verificar la prevalencia de EC/SGNC en pacientes con FM y la asociación entre manifestaciones gastrointestinales y síntomas de FM. Material y métodos: Sesenta y dos mujeres con FM (ACR2010) fueron reclutadas de las consultas de FM de un hospital terciario. La evaluación incluyó el índice de dolor generalizado (IDG), la escala de gravedad de síntomas (SS), la escala de angustia polisintomática (EAP) y el cuestionario de impacto de la fibromialgia (FIQ). Los sujetos fueron examinados para la presencia de anticuerpos celíacos y se realizó una endoscopia gastrointestinal superior (biopsias duodenales) para el diagnóstico de EC/SGNC. Se investigaron las asociaciones estadísticas entre las molestias gastrointestinales y los síntomas de FM (p<0,05). Resultados: Un total de 46 (74,2%) mujeres refirieron al menos un síntoma digestivo: estreñimiento, distensión abdominal, pérdida de peso/inapetencia y náuseas/vómitos. Catorce (31,8%) presentaban duodenitis macroscópica y 2 (4,5%) infiltrados linfocíticos duodenales, pero ninguno cumplía criterios de EC. En un (1,6%) paciente se confirmó SGNC. Hubo asociación entre la presencia de síntoma digestivo y IDG y SS (fatiga, despertarse cansado, cognición), pero no hubo diferencia en FIQ entre pacientes con y sin síntomas gastrointestinales. Conclusión: A pesar de la alta prevalencia de síntomas digestivos y su asociación con el grado de amplificación del dolor central, la frecuencia de EC/SGNC fue insignificante. Además, no se observaron diferencias en el impacto de la FM en la calidad de vida (FIQ) en pacientes con y sin síntomas gastrointestinales.(AU)

Life quality evaluation using "time trade off" method for rheumatoid hands / Avaliando qualidade de vida do paciente com artrite nas mãos pelo método "time trade off"

ABSTRACT Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis is a prevalent disease in the population (range 0.5% to 1%) and involves both orthopedic and rheumatologic treatment. The Time Trade-Off (TTO) technique, which determines the number of years the patient or the professional would be allowed before a successful procedure in terms of life expectancy and value of the procedure, has been gaining ground in clinical protocols. From this standpoint, we sought to compare evaluations provided by the patients, orthopedists, and rheumatologists in determining the TTO and to correlate their responses with the clinical repercussions using previously established scores such as the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28). Methods: A prospective study was conducted that involved 37 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, orthopedists, and rheumatologists. The TTO questionnaire was administered by an independent evaluator for evaluation using the DAS-28 and the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Results: The descriptive analysis revealed similar medians between the orthopedists, rheumatologists, and patients for single assessments. However, there was a weak correlation between the results from the patient and rheumatologist, the patient and Brief Michigan Questionnaire, and those of the orthopedic surgeon and the DAS-28. Conclusion: Similar median values demonstrated equivalent TTO among the orthopedist, rheumatologist, and patient. However, given the weak correlations between the scores, it was not possible to substitute results using a single evaluation scale. Level of Evidence II, Prognostic Studies.

RESUMO Objetivo: Artrite reumatoide é uma doença prevalente na população (0,5% a 1%), envolvendo tratamento tanto ortopédico, quanto reumatológico. A técnica do "Time Trade Off", que determina a quantidade de anos que o paciente ou o profissional daria para ter sucesso absoluto em determinado procedimento, vem ganhando espaço nos protocolos modernos. Diante disto, comparamos a avaliação dada pelo paciente, pelo ortopedista e pelo reumatologista usando "Time Trade Off" e correlacionamos com repercussão clínica e escores já estabelecidos: Brief Michigan Questionnaire (Anexo I) e Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28) (Anexo II). Métodos: Estudo prospectivo com 37 pacientes diagnosticados com artrite reumatoide, que foram submetidos ao questionário "Time Trade Off" pelo ortopedista, pelo reumatologista e por um avaliador independente, e avaliação através do DAS-28 e do Brief Michigan. Resultados: Através da análise descritiva, notou-se medianas semelhantes entre ortopedista, reumatologista e paciente. Entretanto, evidenciou-se correlação fraca entre paciente e reumatologista, paciente e o Brief Michigan; e ortopedista e o DAS-28. Conclusão: Valores de mediana semelhantes demonstram "Time Trade Off" equivalentes entre ortopedista, reumatologista e paciente. Mas, diante das correlações fracas entre os escores, não foi possível substituí-los por uma escala única de avaliação. Nível de Evidência II, Estudo Prognóstico.

LIFE QUALITY EVALUATION USING "TIME TRADE OFF" METHOD FOR RHEUMATOID HANDS.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis is a prevalent disease in the population (range 0.5% to 1%) and involves both orthopedic and rheumatologic treatment. The Time Trade-Off (TTO) technique, which determines the number of years the patient or the professional would be allowed before a successful procedure in terms of life expectancy and value of the procedure, has been gaining ground in clinical protocols. From this standpoint, we sought to compare evaluations provided by the patients, orthopedists, and rheumatologists in determining the TTO and to correlate their responses with the clinical repercussions using previously established scores such as the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted that involved 37 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, orthopedists, and rheumatologists. The TTO questionnaire was administered by an independent evaluator for evaluation using the DAS-28 and the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire. RESULTS: The descriptive analysis revealed similar medians between the orthopedists, rheumatologists, and patients for single assessments. However, there was a weak correlation between the results from the patient and rheumatologist, the patient and Brief Michigan Questionnaire, and those of the orthopedic surgeon and the DAS-28. CONCLUSION: Similar median values demonstrated equivalent TTO among the orthopedist, rheumatologist, and patient. However, given the weak correlations between the scores, it was not possible to substitute results using a single evaluation scale. Level of Evidence II, Prognostic Studies.

OBJETIVO: Artrite reumatoide é uma doença prevalente na população (0,5% a 1%), envolvendo tratamento tanto ortopédico, quanto reumatológico. A técnica do "Time Trade Off", que determina a quantidade de anos que o paciente ou o profissional daria para ter sucesso absoluto em determinado procedimento, vem ganhando espaço nos protocolos modernos. Diante disto, comparamos a avaliação dada pelo paciente, pelo ortopedista e pelo reumatologista usando "Time Trade Off" e correlacionamos com repercussão clínica e escores já estabelecidos: Brief Michigan Questionnaire (Anexo I) e Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28) (Anexo II). MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo com 37 pacientes diagnosticados com artrite reumatoide, que foram submetidos ao questionário "Time Trade Off" pelo ortopedista, pelo reumatologista e por um avaliador independente, e avaliação através do DAS-28 e do Brief Michigan. RESULTADOS: Através da análise descritiva, notou-se medianas semelhantes entre ortopedista, reumatologista e paciente. Entretanto, evidenciou-se correlação fraca entre paciente e reumatologista, paciente e o Brief Michigan; e ortopedista e o DAS-28. CONCLUSÃO: Valores de mediana semelhantes demonstram "Time Trade Off" equivalentes entre ortopedista, reumatologista e paciente. Mas, diante das correlações fracas entre os escores, não foi possível substituí-los por uma escala única de avaliação. Nível de Evidência II, Estudo Prognóstico.