Recommendations for the management of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: joint consensus statements from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney cancer, primarily renal cell carcinoma (RCC), ranks among the top 10 most common malignancies in the male population of Hong Kong. In 2019, members of two medical societies in Hong Kong formed an expert panel to establish a set of consensus statements for the management of metastatic RCC. On 22 June 2021, the same panel met to review recent evidence and reassess their positions regarding the management of advanced and metastatic RCC, with the aim of providing recommendations for physicians in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: The panel included 12 experts (6 clinical oncologists and 6 urologists) who had extensive experience managing patients with RCC in Hong Kong. EVIDENCE: The panel reviewed randomised controlled trials, observational studies, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and international clinical guidelines to address key clinical questions that were identified before the meeting. CONSENSUS PROCESS: In total, 15 key clinical questions were identified before the meeting, covering the surgical and systemic treatment of advanced or metastatic clear cell, sarcomatoid, and non-clear cell RCCs. At the meeting, the panellists voted on these questions, then discussed relevant evidence and practical considerations. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment landscape for advanced and metastatic RCC continues to evolve. More immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination regimens will be indicated for the treatment of metastatic clear cell RCC. There is increasing evidence concerning the benefit of adjuvant ICI treatment for resected advanced RCC. This article summarises recent evidence and expert insights regarding a series of key clinical questions about the management of advanced and metastatic RCC.

Quantitative T1ρ MRI of the Head and Neck Discriminates Carcinoma and Benign Hyperplasia in the Nasopharynx.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: T1ρ imaging is a new quantitative MR imaging pulse sequence with the potential to discriminate between malignant and benign tissue. In this study, we evaluated the capability of T1ρ imaging to characterize tissue by applying T1ρ imaging to malignant and benign tissue in the nasopharynx and to normal tissue in the head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma and benign hyperplasia of the nasopharynx prospectively underwent T1ρ imaging. T1ρ measurements obtained from the histogram analysis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in 43 participants were compared with those for benign hyperplasia and for normal tissue (brain, muscle, and parotid glands) in 41 participants using the Mann-Whitney U test. The area under the curve of significant T1ρ measurements was calculated and compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis and the Delong test, respectively. A P < . 05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: There were significant differences in T1ρ measurements between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and benign hyperplasia and between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and normal tissue (all, P < . 05). Compared with benign hyperplasia, nasopharyngeal carcinoma showed a lower T1ρ mean (62.14 versus 65.45 × ms), SD (12.60 versus 17.73 × ms), and skewness (0.61 versus 0.76) (all P < .05), but no difference in kurtosis (P = . 18). The T1ρ SD showed the highest area under the curve of 0.95 compared with the T1ρ mean (area under the curve = 0.72) and T1ρ skewness (area under the curve = 0.72) for discriminating nasopharyngeal carcinoma and benign hyperplasia (all, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative T1ρ imaging has the potential to discriminate malignant from benign and normal tissue in the head and neck.

Integrating postradiotherapy plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA and TNM stage for risk stratification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to adjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: After curative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT), there is no validated tool to accurately identify patients for adjuvant therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Post-RT circulating plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA can detect minimal residual disease and is associated with recurrence and survival independent of TNM (tumor-lymph node-metastasis) stage. We aimed to develop and validate a risk model for stratification of NPC patients after completion of RT/CRT to observation or adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prospective multicenter 0502 EBV DNA screening cohort (Hong Kong NPC Study Group 0502 trial) enrolled from 2006 to 2015 (n = 745) was used for model development. For internal validation, we pooled independent patient cohorts from prospective clinical studies enrolled from 1997 to 2006 (n = 340). For external validation, we used retrospective cohort of NPC patients treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2009 to 2012 (n = 837). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed NPC of Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 7th Edition stage II-IVB who completed curative RT/CRT with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, had post-RT EBV DNA tested within 120 days after RT and received no adjuvant therapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). We used recursive-partitioning analysis (RPA) to classify patients into groups of low, intermediate, and high risk of death. RESULTS: Combining post-RT EBV DNA level (0, 1-49, 50-499, and ≥500 copies/ml) and TNM stage (II, III, IVAB), RPA model classified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with 5-year OS of 89.4%, 78.5% and 37.2%, respectively. The RPA low-risk group had comparable OS to TNM stage II (5-year OS 88.5%) but identified more patients (64.8% versus stage II 28.1%) that could potentially be spared adjuvant therapy toxicity. The RPA model (c-index 0.712) showed better risk discrimination than either the TNM stage (0.604) or post-RT EBV DNA alone (0.675) with improved calibration and consistence. These results were validated in both internal and external cohorts. CONCLUSION: Combining post-RT EBV DNA and TNM stage improved risk stratification in NPC.

Staging nodal metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: which method should be used to measure nodal dimension on MRI?

AIM: To investigate four methods to measure the maximum dimension (MD) of metastatic neck nodes and correlate with clinical outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 712 NPC patients were analysed. MD measurements using methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 were obtained from a single node in the axial plane; a single node in the axial/coronal plane; a single and/or confluent nodes in the axial/coronal plane; and a single and/or confluent and/or contiguous nodes in the axial/coronal plane, respectively. MDs obtained from the four methods were correlated with nodal volume (NV) using Pearson's correlation test. MDs obtained from the four methods, T and N stages, age, gender, and treatment were correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), and regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) using cox regression. RESULTS: Method 4 (R: 0.84) had the strongest correlation with NV followed by method 3 (R: 0.77), method 2 (R: 0.70) and method 1(R: 0.69). Method 4 was the only independent nodal measurement of OS, DSS, and DMFS (p-values = 0.008, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). None of the MD methods was an independent measurement of RRFS. CONCLUSIONS: The best method to obtain the MD for staging incorporates not only single and confluent, but also contiguous metastatic nodes measured in the plane with the MD.

Dosimetric advantages and superior treatment delivery efficiency of RapidArc over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and pelvic nodes.

AIMS: To compare the dosimetry and treatment delivery efficiency of RapidArc with conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer were studied. Sequential treatment was used. The initial planning target volume (PTV-L) included the prostate, seminal vesicles and pelvic lymphatics, whereas the prostate boost PTV (PTV-P) included the prostate and seminal vesicles only. The total prescription dose was 76 Gy (44 Gy to PTV-L, 32 Gy to PTV-P; 2 Gy/fraction). Two separate planning techniques were generated for each patient: seven static-field IMRT versus two-arc RapidArc. Dose-volume parameters for the organs at risk, conformity index and homogeneity index for the PTVs, the calculated monitor units and treatment delivery time for both techniques were compared. RESULTS: RapidArc gave more conformal plans than IMRT for both PTVs. RapidArc gave a higher homogeneity index to the PTV-P and a similar homogeneity index to the PTV-L. The two techniques gave similar dosimetric results for the rectum, bladder and femoral heads. The mean dose (Dmean) and the maximum dose (Dmax) of the bowel space were reduced by 3.06 and 2.83%, respectively, with RapidArc. The V20 Gy, V30 Gy and V40 Gy for healthy tissues were reduced by 7.77, 14.25 and 17.55%, respectively, with RapidArc. The calculated treatment delivery time and monitor units were reduced by 74.09%/60.93% and 68.32%/48.06% for the PTV-L/PTV-P, respectively, with RapidArc. CONCLUSION: RapidArc is better than conventional IMRT in terms of dosimetry and delivery efficiency for high-risk prostate cancer.

Efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer in Chinese patients.

OBJECTIVE: To report the treatment efficacy and toxicity profile of intensitymodulated radiation therapy in Chinese patients with clinically localised prostate cancer. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Oncology unit in a university teaching hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Patients with clinically localised prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy in our institution between May 2001 and November 2009 were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 5-year biochemical failure­free survival, 5-year overall survival, as well as acute/late gastro-intestinal toxicities and genito-urinary toxicities. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were treated with prostate intensitymodulated radiation therapy with or without whole-pelvic radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 44 months. The median patient age was 72 years. Overall survival of the cohort was 92% after 5 years. The favourable, intermediate, and unfavourable risk category distributions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network were 21 (12%), 42 (23%), and 119 (65%), respectively. The 5-year actuarial biochemical failure­free survival rates for patients in these categories were 95%, 82%, and 80%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified early tumour stage, low pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen levels, and the use of adjuvant androgen deprivation as independent prognostic factors for better biochemical failure­free survival. Grade 2 and 3 late gastro-intestinal/genito-urinary toxicities occurred in 8%/3% and 4%/3% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer is feasible and safe in the Chinese population. These data are consistent with the results of other series in Caucasian populations.