Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 53(7): 1238-41, 2009 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19672974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Within the frame of a twinning programme with Nicaragua, The La Mascota project, we evaluated in our study the contribution of cytogenetic characterization of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as prognostic factor compared to clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical parameters. METHODS: All patients with ALL treated at the only cancer pediatric hospital in Nicaragua during 2006 were studied prospectively. Diagnostic immunophenotyping was performed locally and bone marrow or blood samples were sent to the cytogenetic laboratory of Zurich for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and G-banding. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with ALL were evaluated. Their mean age at diagnosis was 7.3 years, 31.8% were >or=10 years. Thirty-four patients (51.5%) presented with hyperleucocytosis >or=50 x 10(9)/L, 45 (68.2%) had hepatosplenomegaly. Immunophenotypically 63/66 patients (95%) had a B-precursor, 2 (3%) a T- and 1 (1.5%) a B-mature ALL. FISH analysis demonstrated a TEL/AML1 fusion in 9/66 (14%), BCR/ABL fusion in 1 (1.5%), MLL rearrangement in 2 (3.1%), iAMP21 in 2 (3.1%), MYC rearrangement in 1 (1.5%), and high-hyperdiploidy in 16 (24%). All patients but two with TEL/AML1 fusion and high-hyperdiploidy were clinically and hematologically in the standard risk group whereas those with poor cytogenetic factors had clinical high-risk features and were treated intensively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to Europe, the ALL population in Nicaragua is older, has a higher proportion of poor prognostic clinical and hematological features and receives more intensive treatment, while patients with TEL/AML1 translocations and high-hyperdiploidy are clinically in the standard risk group. Cytogenetics did not contribute as an additional prognostic factor in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Adolescente , Aneuploidia , Niño , Preescolar , Bandeo Cromosómico , Subunidad alfa 2 del Factor de Unión al Sitio Principal/genética , Femenino , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/genética , Hepatomegalia/epidemiología , Hepatomegalia/etiología , N-Metiltransferasa de Histona-Lisina , Humanos , Inmunofenotipificación , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Masculino , Proteína de la Leucemia Mieloide-Linfoide/genética , Nicaragua/epidemiología , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/genética , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Esplenomegalia/epidemiología , Esplenomegalia/etiología
2.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 47(6): 801-5, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16358310

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although intra-retinal tumor has long been staged presurgically according to the Reese-Ellsworth (R-E) system, retinoblastoma differs from other pediatric neoplasms in never having had a widely accepted classification system that encompasses the entire spectrum of the disease. Comparisons among studies that consider disease extension, risk factors for extra-ocular relapse, and response to therapy require a universally accepted staging system for extra-ocular disease. PROCEDURE: A committee of retinoblastoma experts from large centers worldwide has developed a consensus classification that can encompass all retinoblastoma cases and is presented herein. Patients are classified according to extent of disease and the presence of overt extra-ocular extension. In addition, a proposal for substaging considering histopathological features of enucleated specimens is presented to further discriminate between Stage I and II patients. RESULTS: The following is a summary of the classification system developed-Stage 0: Patients treated conservatively (subject to presurgical ophthalmologic classifications); Stage I: Eye enucleated, completely resected histologically; Stage II: Eye enucleated, microscopic residual tumor; Stage III: Regional extension [(a) overt orbital disease, (b) preauricular or cervical lymph node extension]; Stage IV: Metastatic disease [(a) hematogenous metastasis: (1) single lesion, (2) multiple lesions; (b) CNS extension: (1) prechiasmatic lesion, (2) CNS mass, (3) leptomeningeal disease]. A proposal is also presented for substaging of enucleated Stages I and II eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed staging system is the product of an international effort to adopt a uniform staging system for patients with retinoblastoma to cover the whole spectrum of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Estadificación de Neoplasias/normas , Neoplasias de la Retina/clasificación , Neoplasias de la Retina/diagnóstico , Retinoblastoma/clasificación , Retinoblastoma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Retina/patología , Retinoblastoma/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA