Prevalence and Predictors of Young-Onset Colorectal Neoplasia: Insights From a Nationally Representative Colonoscopy Registry.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A disturbing increase in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) has prompted recent guidelines to recommend lowering the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening starting age from 50 to 45 years old for average-risk individuals. Little is known about the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in individuals between 45 and 49 years old, or even younger, in the United States. We analyzed a large, nationally representative data set of almost 3 million outpatient colonoscopies to determine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, colorectal neoplasia among patients aged 18 to 54. METHODS: Findings from high-quality colonoscopies were analyzed from AMSURG ambulatory endoscopy centers (ASCs) that report their results in the GI Quality Improvement Consortium (GIQuIC) Registry. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for EOCRC. RESULTS: Increasing age, male sex, White race, family history of CRC, and examinations for bleeding or screening were all associated with higher odds of advanced premalignant lesions (APLs) and CRC. Among patients aged 45 to 49, 32% had any neoplasia, 7.5% had APLs, and 0.58% had CRC. Rates were almost as high in those aged 40 to 44. Family history of CRC portended neoplasia rates 5 years earlier. Rates of APLs were higher in American Indian/Alaskan Natives, but lower among Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics, compared with White counterparts. The prevalence of any neoplasia and APL gradually increased between 2014 and 2019, in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide support for lowering the screening age to 45 for all average-risk individuals. Early messaging to patients and providers in the years leading up to age 45 is warranted, especially in those with a family history of CRC.

Infliximab for Crohn's Disease: More Than 13 Years of Real-world Experience.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term safety of infliximab and nonbiologic agents as Crohn's disease (CD) therapy. Methods: Patients with CD were prospectively evaluated in this large, observational registry. Results: Patients (n = 6273) participated in this observational registry from July 1999 through March 2012; 3440 (54.8%) received infliximab (20,971 patient-years), and 2833 (45.2%) received other treatments only (14,806 patient-years). Overall, 59,875 infliximab infusions were administered (80%, 5 mg/kg); 3006 (89.9%) patients received ≥2 infusions. Adverse events (AEs), most commonly those related to CD (eg, abdominal pain, diarrhea), and serious AEs occurred at a higher rate among infliximab-treated patients. Mortality (0.57/100 patient-years, 0.67/100 patient-years) and malignancy rates (0.69/100 patient-years, 0.71/100 patient-years) for infliximab-treated and other-treatments-only patients, respectively, were generally similar. Serious infection rates were higher for infliximab-treated (2.15/100 patient-years) than other-treatments-only patients (0.86/100 patient-years). Infliximab dose was not associated with mortality or serious infection. An increased risk of serious infection was observed with age (>52 years vs ≤30 years) when examined in infliximab-treated patients. Nonserious cerebrovascular accidents (13 events, 0.06/100 patient-years; 5 events, 0.03/100 patient-years) and pulmonary embolisms (11 events, 0.05/100 patient-years; 4 events 0.03/100 patient-years) also occurred at higher rates among infliximab-treated patients than other-treatments-only patients. Conclusions: Through more than 13 years of registry experience and an overall median duration of patient follow-up >6 years, mortality was similar between the infliximab-treated and other-treatments-only groups. These final cumulative results are representative of real-world experience among infliximab-treated patients with CD and are consistent with the known risks of disease activity and tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy.

Comparisons of Serum Infliximab and Antibodies-to-Infliximab Tests Used in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Trials of Remicade®.

Monitoring infliximab (IFX) concentrations and antibodies-to-IFX (ATI) titers during inflammatory bowel disease treatment may allow more informed decisions in assessing exposure/response and determining appropriate dosing. To aid in interpreting results from different commercial tests in the context of Janssen's published Remicade® results, the reliability of Janssen's IFX and ATI assays was compared with commercial assays from KU Leuven, Sanquin, Dynacare, and LabCorp. Test results were independently reported to Janssen. All assays were tested for specificity, selectivity, and precision. ATI assays were evaluated for sensitivity, drug interference, and potential interference of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). IFX assays were specific, accurate, and reproducible. Intra-class correlation of Janssen IFX assay results with those from KU Leuven, Sanquin, Dynacare, and LabCorp were 0.960, 0.895, 0.931, and 0.971, respectively. ATI titers >10 interfered with IFX assessment in all IFX assays, whereas TNF-α (≤50 ng/mL) did not interfere with IFX detection in any assay. ATI assays specifically and reproducibly detected ATI. Janssen, Sanquin, and LabCorp ATI methods were more resistant to IFX interference than Dynacare and KU Leuven, which were affected by IFX concentrations at ≥2 µg/mL. TNF-α (<5 ng/mL) did not interfere with ATI detection. Strong agreement was observed between Janssen's IFX and ATI assays and the diagnostic service provider assays. Our study results indicate that all four commercially available assays are suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX. The substantial agreement reported here between the comparator assays and the Janssen drug-tolerant assay provides support to clinicians in their use of these commercial assays, and for understanding their patients' IFX and ATI results relative to published data from clinical studies of Remicade.

A randomized, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets with 2L polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for colon cleansing.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of NaP tablets have not been compared with 2L PEG lavage solution. A multicenter, investigator-blinded study was conducted to compare the colon-cleansing efficacy of a new NaP tablet formulation with that of 2L PEG solution plus bisacodyl tablets in adults undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 481 patients were randomized to receive either 32 tablets (48 g) of NaP or 2L PEG solution plus 4 (20 mg) bisacodyl tablets. Quality of colon cleansing was assessed using a 4-point scale (1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = fair, and 4 = inadequate), and the primary efficacy end point was mean overall colon-cleansing score. Safety assessments included recording of adverse events and changes in biochemical tests and vital signs. RESULTS: A total of 411 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The mean overall and ascending colon-cleansing scores for NaP tablets were significantly better than PEG plus bisacodyl (overall 1.5 vs 1.8, ascending 1.4 vs 1.8, P < 0.0001 for both). Patients treated with NaP tablets experienced significantly fewer adverse events (66%vs 82%, P= 0.0003) and gastrointestinal symptoms (64%vs 79%, P= 0.0001) compared with patients receiving PEG plus bisacodyl. Patients receiving NaP tablets were significantly less likely to experience abdominal distention, abdominal pain, and vomiting than patients receiving PEG plus bisacodyl (P < 0.0012). Transient fluctuations in laboratory parameters were observed in both treatment groups; however, the fluctuations were more common and of greater magnitude in the NaP group particularly in phosphorous, sodium, and potassium. CONCLUSION: The colon-cleansing efficacy of the new 32-tablet NaP dosing regimen in this study was found to be significantly better than the 2L PEG solution plus bisacodyl tablets regimen. The 32-tablet NaP dosing regimen was associated with fewer adverse events. As expected electrolyte shifts were more common and of greater magnitude in the NaP group compared with the PEG plus bisacodyl group; however, both treatment groups demonstrated significant changes in electrolytes and creatinine.