Pedicle Screw Placement Aided by C-Arm Fluoroscopy: A "Nevermore without" Technology to Pursue Optimal Spine Fixation.

The surgical technique and the intraoperative technology that support spinal pedicle screw placement have consistently evolved over the past decades to decrease the misplacement rate of pedicle screws. We retrospectively evaluated our case series by analyzing the period 2016-2020. Patients undergoing pedicle screw fixation for cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine degenerative diseases have been included. Surgery was carried out with the aid of intraoperative 3D C-arm fluoroscopy to assess and optimize screw placement and/or correct possible mispositioning. Each patient underwent a postoperative CT scan. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement and estimate the variation in mispositioning rates. We carried out 329 surgical procedures, as follows: 70 cervical, 78 thoracic spine, and 181 lumbar spine surgeries. An excellent overall pedicle screw positioning was obtained, with slight differences between the cervical (98.6%), thoracic (100%), and lumbar (98.9%) tracts. Accordingly, only three patients required a revision surgery owing to mispositioning (0.91%). In particular, intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy significatively improved the accuracy of thoracic screw positioning, as shown by postoperative CT scans. Our experience proves the crucial role of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in pursuing optimal technical results and improving patient outcomes at follow-up.

New Trend in Craniovertebral Junction Surgical Strategy: Technical Note for the Treatment of Hangman's Fractures Through a Minimally Invasive Approach.

INTRODUCTION: The reduction, stabilization, and maintenance of alignment are the main goals in the surgical treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. The choice of the surgical strategy remains poorly standardized; anterior and/or posterior fusion could be performed; and none of the available clinical studies in the literature have shown significant differences in outcomes or complication rates. Vertebral anatomy, age, comorbidities, patient factors, and surgical experience may guide the treatment choice. METHODS: We present a case of a polytraumatized young woman with an unstable hangman's fracture type II, according to Levine-Edwards classification. We treated the fracture by using a plate with four holes to fix C2-C3 without discectomy and body fusion. RESULTS: We performed a small incision, such as those used for the fixation of odontoid screws, where the working angle allowed us to easily and quickly position the plate by using a minimally invasive approach. CONCLUSION: The stabilization alone, without discectomy and body fusion with the cage, in the same way favored the natural healing of the bone fracture. In our opinion, in some select cases, fixation of C2-C3 alone through a minimally invasive approach allows for bone healing with fewer risks and an easier surgery.

Type II Odontoid Fracture: a case series highlighting the treatment strategies.

BACKGROUND: A type II odontoid fracture, if unstable, can cause spinal cord damage. In this case, it is essential to choose the correct treatment-but the issues of what the correct treatment is and which of the different surgical options is best are quite controversial. In this paper we present strategies for treatment of type II odontoid fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive cases of type II odontoid fracture were treated at the Division of Neurosurgery at Villa Sofia Hospital in Palermo (23 cases) and at the Neurosurgical Clinic, University Hospital of Palermo (seven cases), from January 2011 to August 2016. Four patients were treated with external immobilization. Twenty-six patients underwent a surgical procedure. RESULTS: There was no mortality related to the surgical procedure. One patient had a pre- and postoperative neurological deficit, and remained tetraparetic. Follow-up radiological studies in the surgically treated group showed bone union in 21 patients and stable fibrous union in one. CONCLUSION: In our and other authors' experience, when the direction of the fracture line is down and forward, external immobilization can be sufficient for healing. Anterior odontoid screw fixation can be considered the treatment of choice for unstable odontoid fractures (with a horizontal, down and back, or comminuted fracture line) without dislocation or with dislocation less than 7 mm.When the odontoid fracture is associated with a Jefferson fracture or dislocation greater than 7 mm, stabilization of C1-C2 may be necessary. In this case, placement of screws in the dens and in the joints through a single approach represents the most valid technique.In the case of an inveterate fracture of the dens with severe C1-C2 dislocation, the surgical operation that offers the best prospects is posterior stabilization, utilizing the Guo technique.