Protocol for the Phase 2 EDELIFE Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Intra-Amniotic ER004 Administration to Male Subjects with X-Linked Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia.

X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) is a rare genetic disorder characte-rised by abnormal development of the skin and its appendages, such as hair and sweat glands, the teeth, and mucous glands of the airways, resulting in serious, sometimes life-threatening complications like hyperthermia or recurrent respiratory infections. It is caused by pathogenic variants of the ectodysplasin A gene (EDA). Most affected males are hemizygous for EDA null mutations that lead to the absence or inactivity of the signalling protein ectodysplasin A1 (EDA1) and, thus, to the full-blown phenotype with inability to perspire and few if any teeth. There are currently no long-term treatment options for XLHED. ER004 represents a first-in-class protein replacement molecule designed for specific, high-affinity binding to the endogenous EDA1 receptor (EDAR). Its proposed mechanism of action is the replacement of missing EDA1 in yet unborn patients with XLHED. Once bound to EDAR, ER004 activates the EDA/NFκB signalling pathway, which triggers the transcription of genes involved in the normal development of multiple tissues. Following preclinical studies, named-patient use cases demonstrated significant potential of ER004 in affected males treated in utero during the late second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In order to confirm these results, we started the EDELIFE trial, a prospective, open-label, genotype-match controlled, multicentre clinical study to investigate the efficacy and safety of intra-amniotic ER004 administration as a prenatal treatment for male subjects with XLHED. This article summarises the rationale, the study protocol, ethical issues of the trial, and potential pitfalls.

Natural history of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: a 5-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) is caused by pathogenic variants of the gene EDA disrupting the prenatal development of ectodermal derivatives. Cardinal symptoms are hypotrichosis, lack of teeth, and hypo- or anhidrosis, but the disease may also evoke other clinical problems. This study aimed at investigating the clinical course of XLHED in early childhood as the basis for an evaluation of the efficacy of potential treatments. METHODS: 25 children (19 boys and 6 girls between 11 and 35 months of age) with genetically confirmed XLHED were enrolled in a long-term natural history study. Clinical data were collected both retrospectively using parent questionnaires and medical records (pregnancy, birth, infancy) and prospectively until the age of 60 months. General development, dentition, sweating ability, ocular, respiratory, and skin involvement were assessed by standardized clinical examination and yearly quantitative surveys. RESULTS: All male subjects suffered from persistent anhidrosis and heat intolerance, although a few sweat ducts were detected in some patients. Sweating ability of girls with XLHED ranged from strongly reduced to almost normal. In the male subjects, 1-12 deciduous teeth erupted and 0-8 tooth germs of the permanent dentition became detectable. Tooth numbers were higher but variable in the female group. Most affected boys had no more than three if any Meibomian glands per eyelid, most girls had fewer than 10. Many male subjects developed additional, sometimes severe health issues, such as obstructive airway conditions, chronic eczema, or dry eye disease. Adverse events included various XLHED-related infections, unexplained fever, allergic reactions, and retardation of psychomotor development. CONCLUSIONS: This first comprehensive study of the course of XLHED confirmed the early involvement of multiple organs, pointing to the need of early therapeutic intervention.

Pharmacokinetics of naftidrofuryl in patients with renal impairment.

Naftidrofuryl (CAS 31329-57-4) is used, mainly in elderly patients, in the treatment of various vascular disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetics of naftidrofuryl after single oral administration of a 200 mg naftidrofuryl tablet (Praxilene) in caucasian male and female subjects with renal impairment versus healthy volunteers. This prospective and open study was conducted in three parallel groups: Group A = healthy subjects with a Cl(CR) > 80 ml/min, Group B = uraemic patients with a 20 < or = Cl(CR) < 40 ml/min, Group C = uraemic patients with a Cl(CR) < 20 ml/min. Blood samples were taken over a period of 32 h after dosing. The mean values (+/-SD) of the pharmacokinetic parameters of naftidrofuryl for group A were as follows: tmax: 1.3 h (median), Cmax: 174 +/- 46 ng/ml, t(1/2 beta): 4.4 +/- 1.1 h, AUC(0-infinity): 1541 +/- 384 ng x h/ml; for group B: tmax: 2.5 h (median), Cmax: 239 +/- 94 ng/ml, t(1/2 beta): 5.0 +/- 1.2 h, AUC(0-infinity): 2361 +/- 751 ng x h/ml; for group C: tmax: 3.0 h (median), Cmax: 236 +/- 104 ng/ml, t(1/2 beta): 5.0 +/- 2.1 h, AUC(0-infinity): 2488 +/- 2003 ng x h/ml. The statistical analysis was performed on the pharmacokinetic parameters with one-way ANOVA in order to compare each group. No significant difference between each group was observed. In conclusion, renal insufficiency did not appear to influence the pharmacokinetic profile of oral naftidrofuryl.