Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the French version of the drooling impact scale.

BACKGROUND: work still needs to be done to measure the impact of sialorrhea on quality of life and define the efficacy of different therapies. The Drooling Impact Scale showed good validity and sensitivity to change, especially after botulinum toxin injection. The aim of this study is to present its French translation and to explore its validity, reliability and responsiveness to change in a group of children with Cerebral Palsy. METHODS: multicentre study at six rehabilitation centres in France. Children with Cerebral Palsy aged 4-18 years with sialorrhea problems were included (n = 55), either in a control group (n = 33) or in the intervention group (n = 22, with 3 drug treatment and 19 botulinum toxin injections). The French Drooling Impact Scale was administered twice, 1 month apart. RESULTS: The French Drooling Impact Scale total score at inclusion was meanly 53.9 (Standard Deviation 11.9) in the stable control group and 66.0 (16.1) in the intervention group (p = 0.0058). The validity of the scale was established, as well as an adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.71); correlations between each item and the total score were found between 0.5 and 0.71 except for item 5 (r = 0.38) and item 7 (0.41). The test-retest reliability in stable children was good (Lin coefficient = 0.83, bias correction factor = 0.92 and Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.89). There was a high responsiveness to change, mean change was -40.0 in the intervention group and -3.6 in the stable group (p < 0.0001), with Standard Error of Measurement = 2.6. CONCLUSION: the French Drooling Impact Scale has shown sufficient clinometric properties to be used now by clinicians or researchers.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Drooling Impact scale has now its French version.The French version of the Drooling Impact Scale has shown its validity and a good test-retest reliability.The responsiveness to change was explored in a group of children undergoing saliva-control interventions and the scale was able to show a big change.The authors recommend to use this questionnaire in a semi-directed interview conducted by a health professional.

Relevance of intraglandular injections of Botulinum toxin for the treatment of sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy: a review.

BACKGROUND: After the age of 4 years, drooling becomes pathological and impacts the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy. Intraglandular injection of Botulinum toxin is one of the treatments available to limit this phenomenon. AIMS: The objectives of this review were to validate the efficacy of Botulinum toxin injections for drooling in children with cerebral palsy, determine recommendations and identify potential side effects. METHODS: We conducted a literature review from 2001 in the following databases: Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane using the keywords: sialorrhea, drooling, hypersalivation, Botulinum toxin, cerebral palsy and children. Only the articles evaluating the efficacy of Botulinum toxin in children with cerebral palsy over the age of 4 were researched. RESULTS: Eight studies were found: 2 case studies, 3 open and non-controlled studies and 3 randomized controlled trials. Efficacy results in this indication are quite encouraging and the use of BTX injections is safe but the overall level of evidence of these studies was quite low. CONCLUSION: However, intraglandular injection of Botulinum toxin has a place among the therapeutic array available for the management of sialorrhea in this population even if no standardized protocol is available yet.

Use of the Faces Pain Scale by left and right hemispheric stroke patients.

No pain scale is available for stroke patients due to the presence of language or cognitive disorders. However, the Faces Pain Scale (FPS), which was initially developed for children, has been used with success in adults with cognitive impairments. The aim of this study is to test whether the FPS could be used in left or right hemispheric stroke patients (LHSP, RHSP). One hundred twenty-seven stoke patients and 21 controls were recruited in 2 rehabilitation units. Construct validity of FPS was assessed by rating and ranking facial expressions. FPS was correlated to a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and to a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) for the assessment of shoulder pain. Reliability was determined by test-retest procedures. Performances of RHSP in the ranking and rating procedures were very poor compared to LHSP and to controls. However, in the assessment of patients' shoulder pain, FPS scores were highly correlated with VAS and VRS in both stroke groups (r=0.65-0.82, p<10(-3)). FPS was more reliable in LHSP than in RHSP. It was preferred to VAS and VRS in LHSP, while in RHSP VAS was the preferred scale. The present study provides preliminary support for the validity and the reliability of FPS in LHSP. However, we do not recommend its sole use in stroke patients. Further studies are needed to determine whether FPS can be used in stroke patients for assessing changes in severity of pain over time.