Survey of brachytherapy practice in the United States: a report of the Clinical Research Committee of the American Endocurietherapy Society.

PURPOSE: To obtain reliable data on the extent of the brachytherapy practice in the United States by conducting a comprehensive survey of all facilities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Clinical Research Committee of the AES surveyed all 1321 radiation oncology facilities identified in the Patterns of Care Study (PCS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR). Multiple mailings and follow-up were made to obtain a high response rate. Survey responders and nonresponders were compared using chi-square tests. Summary statistics were reported. RESULTS: Of the 1321 facilities, 1054 responded (80%). Hospital-based and larger facilities had a statistically significant higher rate of response. Brachytherapy was being performed at 819 facilities (the median number of procedures = 21-50). Two hundred and two facilities did no brachytherapy. The common isotopes used were 137Cs (705 facilities), 192Ir (585 facilities), 125I (236 facilities), and 131I (194 facilities). The common brachytherapy techniques used were intracavitary (751 facilities), interstitial (536 facilities), intraluminal (310 facilities), and plaques (148 facilities). Remote afterloaded brachytherapy was used at 205 centers as follows: high dose rate (HDR) (164), medium dose rate (MDR) (5), and low dose rate (LDR) (36). Computerized dosimetry was most commonly used (790 facilities), followed by Patterson-Parker (104 facilities) and Quimby (72 facilities). The common sites treated were cervix (701 facilities), endometrium (565 facilities), head and neck (354 facilities), and lung (344 facilities). CONCLUSION: Data regarding brachytherapy practice has been obtained from a large percentage (80%) of all facilities in the United States. The majority (78-81%) of radiation oncology facilities perform brachytherapy; however, its use is restricted to gynecological implants in many of these centers. The results from this survey will be used to develop a pattern of care study and data registry in brachytherapy.

Combined modality program with possible organ preservation for invasive bladder carcinoma: results of RTOG protocol 85-12.

PURPOSE: This Phase II study was designed to test the tolerance and effectiveness of concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. Objectives were to determine toxicity, complete response rate, bladder preservation rate, and survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with invasive bladder cancer, clinical Stages T2-4, NO-2 or NX, MO were treated with pelvic radiotherapy 40 Gy in 4 weeks and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22. Complete responders were given an additional 24 Gy bladder boost plus a third dose of cisplatin; patients with residual tumor after 40 Gy were assigned radical cystectomy. RESULTS: The complete remission rate following cisplatin and 40 Gy for evaluable cases was 31/47 (66%). Acute toxicity was acceptable with only two patients not completing induction therapy. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors were more likely to achieve complete remission. Of fully evaluable patients, 28/42 (67%) achieved complete remission with induction therapy, 11 remain continuously in remission, and eight have relapsed with bladder as the only site of failure. Five of these eight cases relapsed with noninvasive tumor. Of the 14 patients who failed to achieve complete remission, only three remain disease-free. Median survival is not reached, with 17/42 (19/48) deaths reported. Actuarial survival is 64% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: This combined cisplatin-radiotherapy regimen was moderately well-tolerated and associated with tumor clearance in 66% of patients treated. Isolated bladder recurrences with invasive carcinoma are infrequent. Better definition of pretreatment selection criteria is needed if combined modality treatment is to achieve disease control and organ preservation for patients with bladder cancer.