Caregiver Quality of Life During Pediatric Influenza-Like Illness: A Cross-Sectional Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The objective of this study was to quantify the quality of life (QoL) of caregivers with children with influenza-like illnesses (ILI) and to identify factors associated with worse QoL. This was a cross-sectional cohort study of caregivers in a pediatric emergency department with previously healthy young children with ILI. The primary outcome was caregiver QoL. Additional measures included health literacy, social support, and caregiver health status. Two hundred and eighty-one caregivers completed the study. And 41% reported overall QoL was worse during their child's illness. The median QoL score was 3.8 [3.1, 4.6] in a 7-point scale. Illness duration was associated with worse overall QoL score (0.128 worse for each additional day of illness). The median emotions domain score was 2.5 [1.5, 4.0], the worst of any domain. Caregivers who perceived worse illness severity had lower emotions domain scores (2.61 vs 6.00, P = .0269). Caregivers with adequate literacy had lower mean QoL scores (3.08 vs 4.44, P < .0001). Childhood illnesses worsen caregiver QoL. Factors associated with worse QoL were perception of illness severity and duration. Addressing caregiver QoL could mitigate the impact of childhood acute illnesses on caregiver wellbeing.

The Association of Emergency Severity Index Score and Patient and Family Experience in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

The study aim was to determine the relationship between a patient's Emergency Severity Index (ESI) score and their or their family's response to the key performance indicator (KPI) question on the post-visit patient and family experience (PFE) survey. Retrospective review of patients presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Department between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, who completed the KPI question on an associated post-visit survey. We performed univariate analyses on all candidate variables; multivariable linear regression identified independent predictors of KPI on the PFE survey. A total of 8136 patients were included in the study. Although ESI score was significantly associated with PFE in univariate analysis, this association was lost in the multivariable model. Independent associations were appreciated with race/ethnicity, time to provider, length of stay, and procedure performance during the visit. Although ESI is not independently associated with PFE in this study, its interaction with factors such as time to provider, length of stay, and procedure performance may be important for emergency department providers creating interventions to impact experience during low acuity visits.

Improving Care Delivery: Location Timestamps to Enhance Process Measurement of a Clinical Workflow.

Traditional quality improvement (QI) strategies to describe workflow processes rely primarily upon qualitative methods or human-driven observations. These methods may be limited in scope and accuracy when applied to time-based workflow processes. This study sought to evaluate the utility of integrating objective time measurements to augment traditional QI strategies using procedural sedation workflow in a pediatric emergency department as an archetype. METHODS: We applied the FOCUS-Plan-Do-Check-Act framework to reduce the time from arrival to sedation for long-bone fractures. First, we added supplementary framework-defining steps to repeat the Clarifying and Understanding steps. We then extracted objective time-based data from an electronic health record (EHR) system and a real-time locating system (RTLS). We then compared and contrasted the findings of traditional surveys with analyses of timed steps within the sedation workflow. RESULTS: When identifying the source of delays, traditional survey techniques yielded ambiguous and even conflicting results based on clinical roles. The timestamps supported 5 measurable clinical role of subworkflows. By measuring the time to completion for 54 sedation cases, workflow patterns and significant bottlenecks were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Analyzing the time to complete individual tasks provided a more nuanced description of workflow delays and clarity when traditional survey results conflicted. Augmenting traditional QI process maps with EHR and RTLS timestamps better explained workflow bottlenecks, informing the QI team when selecting targets for subsequent Plan-Do-Check-Act work.

Standardized Headache Therapy in the Pediatric Emergency Department Using Improvement Methodology.

INTRODUCTION: Primary headache is a common cause of pediatric emergency department (PED) visits. Without published guidelines to direct treatment options, various strategies lacking evidence are often employed. This study aims to standardize primary headache treatment in the PED by promoting evidence-based therapies, reducing nonstandard abortive therapies, and introducing dihydroergotamine (DHE) into practice. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed key drivers, created a clinical care algorithm, and updated electronic medical record order sets. Outcome measures included the percentage of patients receiving evidence-based therapies, nonstandard abortive therapies, DHE given after failed first-line therapies, and overall PED length of stay. Process measures included the percent of eligible patients with the order set usage and medications received within 90 minutes. Balancing measures included hospital admissions and returns to the PED within 72 hours. Annotated control charts depicted results over time. RESULTS: We collected data from July 2017 to December 2019. The percent of patients receiving evidence-based therapies increased from 69% to 73%. The percent of patients receiving nonstandard abortive therapies decreased from 2.5% to 0.6%. The percent of patients receiving DHE after failed first-line therapies increased from 0% to 37.2%. No untoward effects on process or balancing measures occurred, with sustained improvement for 14 months. CONCLUSION: Standardization efforts for patients with primary headaches led to improved use of evidence-based therapies and reduced nonstandard abortive therapies. This methodology also led to improved DHE use for migraine headache resistant to first-line therapies. We accomplished these results without increasing length of stay, admission, or return visits.

Definition of a critical bleed in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Platelet Immunology.

BACKGROUND: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet counts and increased risk of bleeding. In preparation for an upcoming guideline, the ITP Emergency Management Guideline Panel, including clinical experts in hematology, emergency medicine, research methodology, and patient representatives, identified the need for a standardized definition of a critical ITP bleed. The goal of the definition was to distinguish critical bleeds from bleeds that may not require urgent treatment, typically in the context of severe thrombocytopenia. METHODS: The panel met in person and virtually to achieve consensus on the criteria for critical bleeding events among patients with ITP. Existing ITP bleeding scores and published definitions of major bleeds in patients receiving anticoagulation informed the definition of a critical ITP bleed. The Platelet Immunology Scientific Standardization Committee (SSC) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis endorsed the definition. RESULTS: A critical ITP bleed was defined as: (a) a bleed in a critical anatomical site including intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome; or (2) an ongoing bleed that results in hemodynamic instability or respiratory compromise. CONCLUSION: The definition of a critical ITP bleed was developed by the ITP Emergency Management Guideline Panel and endorsed by the Platelet Immunology SSC. It incorporates both anatomic and physiologic risk and pertains to patients with confirmed or suspected ITP who typically have severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count below 20 × 109 /L).

Improving Documentation Using a Real-Time Location System in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate documentation of critical care services, including key time-based parameters, is critical to accurate severity of illness metrics and proper reimbursement. Documentation of time-based elements for critical care services performed in emergency departments (ED) remains inconsistent. We integrated electronic medical record and real-time location system (RTLS)-derived data to augment quality improvement methodology. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to increase the proportion of patient encounters with critical care services performed at a pediatric ED that had appropriate documentation from a baseline of 76 to 90% within 6 weeks. METHODS: The team formulated a framework of improvement and performed multiple plan-do-study-act cycles focused on key drivers. We integrated the capabilities of an RTLS for precise location tracking to identify patient encounters in which critical care services were performed and to minimize unnecessary audits and feedback. We developed an intervention using iterative revisions to address key drivers and improve documentation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patient encounters for which critical care services were performed for which a time-based attestation was documented in the medical record. RESULTS: We analyzed 92 encounters between March 2020 and April 2020. While the proportion of eligible patient encounters with critical care documentation improved from 76 to 85%, this change was unable to be directly attributed to improvement efforts. Patients with respiratory complaints encompassed the majority of eligible encounters without appropriate documentation. CONCLUSION: Utilizing improvement methodology and a novel application of RTLS, we successfully identified the co-location of physicians with patients receiving critical care services and designed interventions to improve documentation of critical care services provided in a pediatric ED. While changes were not able to be attributed to improvement efforts in this project, this project demonstrates the utility of RTLS to augment and inform systematic improvement efforts.

Machine learning-based prediction of acute severity in infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis: a multicenter prospective study.

We aimed to develop machine learning models to accurately predict bronchiolitis severity, and to compare their predictive performance with a conventional scoring (reference) model. In a 17-center prospective study of infants (aged < 1 year) hospitalized for bronchiolitis, by using routinely-available pre-hospitalization data as predictors, we developed four machine learning models: Lasso regression, elastic net regression, random forest, and gradient boosted decision tree. We compared their predictive performance-e.g., area-under-the-curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and net benefit (decision curves)-using a cross-validation method, with that of the reference model. The outcomes were positive pressure ventilation use and intensive treatment (admission to intensive care unit and/or positive pressure ventilation use). Of 1,016 infants, 5.4% underwent positive pressure ventilation and 16.0% had intensive treatment. For the positive pressure ventilation outcome, machine learning models outperformed reference model (e.g., AUC 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.93] in gradient boosted decision tree vs 0.62 [95% CI 0.53-0.70] in reference model), with higher sensitivity (0.89 [95% CI 0.80-0.96] vs. 0.62 [95% CI 0.49-0.75]) and specificity (0.77 [95% CI 0.75-0.80] vs. 0.57 [95% CI 0.54-0.60]). The machine learning models also achieved a greater net benefit over ranges of clinical thresholds. Machine learning models consistently demonstrated a superior ability to predict acute severity and achieved greater net benefit.

Parental Language and Return Visits to the Emergency Department After Discharge.

OBJECTIVE: Return visits to the emergency department (ED) are used as a marker of quality of care. Limited English proficiency, along with other demographic and disease-specific factors, has been associated with increased risk of return visit, but the relationship between language, short-term return visits, and overall ED use has not been well characterized. METHODS: This is a planned secondary analysis of a prospective cohort examining the ED discharge process for English- or Spanish-speaking parents of children aged 2 months to 2 years with fever and/or respiratory illness. At 1 year after the index visit, a standardized chart review was performed. The primary outcome was the number of ED visits within 72 hours of the index visit. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relative importance of predictor variables and adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were 202 parents eligible for inclusion, of whom 23% were Spanish speaking. In addition, 6.9% of the sample had a return visit within 72 hours. After adjustment for confounders, Spanish language was associated with return visit within 72 hours (odds ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-11.90) but decreased risk of a second visit within the year (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.66). CONCLUSION: Spanish-speaking parents are at an increased risk of 72-hour return ED visit but do not seem to be at increased risk of ED use during the year after their ED visit.

Parental language and dosing errors after discharge from the pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Safe and effective care after discharge requires parental education in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Parent-provider communication may be more difficult with parents who have limited health literacy or English-language fluency. This study examined the relationship between language and discharge comprehension regarding medication dosing. METHODS: We completed a prospective observational study of the ED discharge process using a convenience sample of English- and Spanish-speaking parents of children 2 to 24 months presenting to a single tertiary care pediatric ED with fever and/or respiratory illness. A bilingual research assistant interviewed parents to ascertain their primary language and health literacy and observed the discharge process. The primary outcome was parental demonstration of an incorrect dose of acetaminophen for the weight of his or her child. RESULTS: A total of 259 parent-child dyads were screened. There were 210 potential discharges, and 145 (69%) of 210 completed the postdischarge interview. Forty-six parents (32%) had an acetaminophen dosing error. Spanish-speaking parents were significantly more likely to have a dosing error (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-8.1), even after adjustment for language of discharge, income, and parental health literacy (adjusted odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-31.7). CONCLUSIONS: Current ED discharge communication results in a significant disparity between English- and Spanish-speaking parents' comprehension of a crucial aspect of medication safety. These differences were not explained purely by interpretation, suggesting that interventions to improve comprehension must address factors beyond language alone.

Effective discharge communication in the emergency department.

Communication at discharge is an important part of high-quality emergency department (ED) care. This review describes the existing literature on patient understanding and implementation of discharge instructions, discusses previous interventions aimed at improving the discharge process, and recommends best practices and future research. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched, using combinations of key terms. Literature from both the adult and pediatric ED populations was reviewed. Multiple reports have shown deficient comprehension at discharge, with patients or parents frequently unable to report their diagnosis, management plan, or reasons to return. Interventions to improve discharge communication have been, at best, moderately successful. Patients need structured content, presented verbally, with written and visual cues to enhance recall. Written instructions need to be provided in the patient's language and at an appropriate reading level. Understanding should be confirmed before the patient leaves the ED. Further research is needed to describe the optimal content, channel, and timing for the ED discharge process and the relationship between discharge process and outcomes.

A content analysis of parents' written communication of needs and expectations for emergency care of their children.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the potential value of information shared by parents on a written form designed to capture needs and expectations for care to an emergency department (ED) system that values patient-centeredness. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective content analysis of parent-completed written forms collected during an improvement project focused on parent-provider communication in a pediatric ED. The primary outcome was potential value of the completed forms to a patient-centered ED system, defined as a form that was legible, included observations that mapped to medical problems, and included reasonable parental requests. We analyzed variation in potential value and other form attributes across a priori-defined visit type and acuity. Visit type was validated by a separate, blinded medical record review. RESULTS: A random stratified sample of 1008 forms was established from 6937 parent-completed forms collected during the 6-month improvement project; 995 of 1008 forms had matching medical records; 922 (92.7%) of 995 forms demonstrated potential value; 990 (99.5%) of 995 forms were legible; 948 (95.3%) of 995 forms included observations that mapped to a medical problem, and 599 (93.3%) of 642 forms contained reasonable parental requests. There was good agreement between the form and medical record for visit type (κ = 0.62). The potential value of forms did not vary significantly across visit type (88.2%-92.8%) or acuity (88.9%-93.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Information shared by parents on written forms designed to capture needs and expectations provides potential value to a patient-centered ED system. The high level of informational value is consistent across patient type and acuity level.

Health literacy and task environment influence parents' burden for data entry on child-specific health information: randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Health care systems increasingly rely on patients' data entry efforts to organize and assist in care delivery through health information exchange. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine (1) the variation in burden imposed on parents by data entry efforts across paper-based and computer-based environments, and (2) the impact, if any, of parents' health literacy on the task burden. METHODS: We completed a randomized controlled trial of parent-completed data entry tasks. Parents of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were randomized based on the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) to either a paper-based or computer-based environment for entry of health information on their children. The primary outcome was the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (TLX) total weighted score. RESULTS: We screened 271 parents: 194 (71.6%) were eligible, and 180 of these (92.8%) constituted the study cohort. We analyzed 90 participants from each arm. Parents who completed information tasks on paper reported a higher task burden than those who worked in the computer environment: mean (SD) TLX scores were 22.8 (20.6) for paper and 16.3 (16.1) for computer. Assignment to the paper environment conferred a significant risk of higher task burden (F(1,178) = 4.05, P = .046). Adequate literacy was associated with lower task burden (decrease in burden score of 1.15 SD, P = .003). After adjusting for relevant child and parent factors, parents' TOFHLA score (beta = -.02, P = .02) and task environment (beta = .31, P = .03) remained significantly associated with task burden. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored computer-based environment provided an improved task experience for data entry compared to the same tasks completed on paper. Health literacy was inversely related to task burden.

Improving parent-provider communication in the pediatric emergency department: results from the clear and concise communication campaign.

OBJECTIVE: We implemented and evaluated a quality improvement initiative targeting parents' communication with clinicians in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: A quality improvement initiative ("Clear and Concise Communication" or "3C") targeting parent-provider communication was implemented in an urban tertiary care pediatric ED. A 1-page form that solicited parent worries, questions, and expectations for care was developed. Parent-provider communication was measured using an 8-item subset of questions from an ongoing satisfaction survey adopted for pediatric emergency care. The primary outcome was the communication score for a given ED visit scaled from 0 to 100 and was calculated as the simple average of answers where the best possible response was given a value of 1 and all others were scored as 0. A multivariate model adjusting for time-related factors, ED volume, and system-level events was developed to examine the influence of the communication initiative. RESULTS: A total of 29,005 patients received care during implementation of 3C; a total of 100,810 patients received care during the 2-year period of interest. Data from 1233 satisfaction surveys were used to create the communication scores. Communication scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a mean of 88 and SD of 17.7. In a linear model adjusting for day, weekend, volume, system-level introduction of electronic charting for nurses, and electronic-order entry for physicians, the 3C initiative demonstrated a positive and statistically significant effect-increasing the communication score by 2.8 points/100 d (95% confidence interval, 0.1-5.5). CONCLUSIONS: The 3C initiative succeeded in improving parents' communication experience with emergency providers during the intervention period.

Incidence of morbidity from penetrating palate trauma.

BACKGROUND: The true rate of neurologic sequelae and infection from penetrating palatal trauma in children is unknown, which leads to significant variation in testing and treatment. OBJECTIVES: To (1) determine the incidence of stroke and infection in well-appearing children with penetrating palatal trauma and (2) describe patterns of testing and treatment for uncomplicated palatal trauma. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of children aged 9 months to 18 years with palatal trauma seen in the emergency department (ED) at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Patients met the following definition: well-appearing with normal neurologic examination and a palate laceration but no findings requiring immediate operative care. Stroke was defined as any abnormal neurologic examination secondary to palatal trauma. Infection was defined as cellulitis or abscess secondary to palatal injury. All abnormal computed tomographic angiography (CTA) findings, except for free air, were considered positive and potentially significant. RESULTS: We identified 1656 potential subjects. A total of 995 of 1656 subjects were screened, and 205 of 995 met the case definition. A total of 122 of 205 had follow-up through at least 1 week after injury. The incidence of stroke in our study population was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0-2.5). One of 116 patients developed infection, for an incidence of 0.9% (95% CI: 0-5.3). A total of 90 of 205 (44%) subjects had CTA scans; the results of 9 (10%) were positive. No patients with positive CTA findings required operative care. No patients received anticoagulant medications. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of morbidity from penetrating palatal trauma in the well-appearing child is extremely low. Diagnostic evaluation in the ED did not prompt clinical interventions other than antibiotics.

Patient-centered design of an information management module for a personally controlled health record.

BACKGROUND: The development of health information technologies should be informed by iterative experiments in which qualitative and quantitative methodologies provide a deeper understanding of the abilities, needs, and goals of the target audience for a personal health application. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to create an interface for parents of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity/disorder (ADHD) to enter disease-specific information to facilitate data entry with minimal task burden. METHODS: We developed an ADHD-specific personal health application to support data entry into a personally controlled health record (PCHR) using a three-step, iterative process: (1) a needs analysis by conducting focus groups with parents of children with ADHD and an heuristic evaluation of a prerelease version of a PCHR, (2) usability testing of an initial prototype personal health application following a "think aloud" protocol, (3) performance testing of a revised prototype, and (4) finalizing the design and functionality of the ADHD personal health application. Study populations for the three studies (focus groups and two usability testing studies) were recruited from organizations in the greater Boston area. Study eligibility included being an English- or Spanish-speaking parent who was the primary caretaker of a school-age child with ADHD. We determined subjects' health literacy using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). We assessed subjects' task burden using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task Load Index. To assess the impact of factors associated with the time spent entering data, we calculated Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between time on task and both task burden and subject characteristics. We conducted t tests to determine if time on task was associated with successful task completion. RESULTS: The focus groups included three cohorts: 4 Spanish-speaking parents with diverse health literacy, 4 English-speaking parents with lower health literacy, and 7 English-speaking parents with higher health literacy. Both the initial usability testing cohort (n = 10) and the performance-testing cohort (n = 7) included parents of diverse health literacy and ethnicity. In performance testing, the prototype PCHRs captured patient-specific data with a mean time on task of 11.9 minutes (SD 6.5). Task burden experienced during data entry was not associated with successful task completion (P = .92). Subjects' past computer experience was highly correlated with time on task (r = .86, P = .01), but not with task burden (r = .18, P = .69). The ADHD personal health application was finalized in response to these results by (1) simplifying the visual environment, (2) including items to support users limited by health literacy or technology experience, and (3) populating the application's welcome screen with pictures of culturally diverse families to establish a personal family-oriented look and feel. CONCLUSIONS: Our patient-centered design process produced a usable ADHD-specific personal health application that minimizes the burden of data entry.

Patients providing the answers: narrowing the gap in data quality for emergency care.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the validity of documentation produced during paediatric emergency care to determine if a patient-driven health information technology called ParentLink produced higher-quality data than documentation completed by nurses and physicians. DESIGN: The authors analysed the quality of information across elements of allergies to medications and the history of present illness (HPI) collected during a quasi-experimental intervention study where control periods with usual care alternated with intervention periods when ParentLink was operational. Documentation by emergency department (ED) providers was abstracted and compared with information generated through ParentLink. The criterion standard for the history of allergies to medications was a structured telephone interview with parents after the ED visit. A valid report for a medication allergy was one that was both accurate and complete. Completeness of the HPI for acute head trauma was evaluated across seven elements relevant to an evidence-based risk assessment. RESULTS: Of 1410 enrolled parents, 1111/1410 (79%) completed the criterion standard interview. Parents' valid reports of allergies to medications were higher than those of nurses (parents 94%, nurses 88%, p<0.0001). Parents' valid reports of allergies to medications were greater than those of physicians (parent 94%, physicians 83%, p<0.0001). ParentLink produced more complete information on HPI for head trauma than the medical record for five of seven elements. CONCLUSION: ParentLink provided electronic information that met or exceeded the quality of data documented by ED nurses and physicians.

Parent-driven technology for decision support in pediatric emergency care.

BACKGROUND: A quasi-experimental intervention study composed of control and intervention periods was conducted to determine if a parent-driven health information technology influenced completeness of documentation and adherence to evidence-based emergency care for children. METHODS: Structured chart abstraction was used to assess documentation and correctness of clinical actions at test ordering, medication prescribed for disease, and medication ordered for pain in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department and a suburban general emergency department. During the intervention periods, parents of children who presented with complaints related to otitis media, urinary tract infection, head trauma, or asthma entered data into a health information technology (ParentLink), which produced treatment plans in the context of evidence-based guidelines. RESULTS: Of 1,410 subjects analyzed, 1,072 (76%) were assigned to one of four disease categories: urinary tract infection (22%), otitis media (20%), asthma (11%) and head trauma (47%). During ParentLink use, documentation of pain significantly improved (28% incomplete [control] versus 15% [intervention], p = .003). Incorrect actions for pain treatment decreased, but not significantly (33% [control] versus 24% [intervention], p = .13). ParentLink did not influence actions for test ordering or prescribing for disease. DISCUSSION: Parent-driven health information technology intended to translate parents' knowledge into clinical practice and to support evidence-based care suggested a trend toward modest impact on pain management but did not demonstrate broad effects across diseases or care processes. The emergence and proliferation of personally controlled health records (PCHRs) presents opportunities for patients and parents to control their medical profiles. Although ParentLink is not a comprehensive PCHR, it represents a step in incorporating parent-derived information into medical decision making.

Impact of a patient-centered technology on medication errors during pediatric emergency care.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a patient-centered health information technology (HIT) on the error rate for ordering and prescribing of medications during emergency pediatric care. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study by using control and intervention periods to evaluate the effect on medication ordering and prescribing from a patient-centered HIT designed to enhance communication between parents and emergency clinicians during emergency care. Parent-child dyads presenting to 2 emergency department (ED) sites with complaints of fever, asthma, head trauma, otalgia, and dysuria were eligible. During intervention periods, parents used the HIT to enter data on symptoms and medication-related history; a printout provided recommendations to clinicians. Data on errors/adverse drug events were collected via record reviews and phone interviews with parents. The primary outcome was the number of medication errors in orders or prescriptions for drugs targeted by the HIT. RESULTS: Of 2002 parent-child dyads screened, 1810 (90%) were eligible, 1411 of 1810 (78%) were enrolled, and 1410 analyzed; 1097 subjects had a total of 2234 orders or prescriptions written. Of these events, 1289 of 2234 (58%) were associated with at least 1 error. Of the 1755 errors discovered, 232 errors were serious and preventable. Among 654 patients exposed to medications targeted by the HIT, the number of errors per 100 patients during control versus intervention periods was not significantly different (173 vs 134 with both sites combined; P = .35.) CONCLUSION: The patient-centered HIT demonstrated minimal impact on medication errors during ED care.

The value of patient self-report for disease surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of self-reported information from patients and families for use in a disease surveillance system. DESIGN: Patients and their parents presenting to the emergency department (ED) waiting room of an urban, tertiary care children's hospital were asked to use a Self-Report Tool, which consisted of a questionnaire asking questions related to the subjects' current illness. MEASUREMENTS: The sensitivity and specificity of three data sources for assigning patients to disease categories was measured: the ED chief complaint, physician diagnostic coding, and the completed Self-Report Tool. The gold standard metric for comparison was a medical record abstraction. RESULTS: A total of 936 subjects were enrolled. Compared to ED chief complaints, the Self-Report Tool was more than twice as sensitive in identifying respiratory illnesses (Rate ratio [RR]: 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-2.44), and dermatological problems (RR: 2.23, 95% CI 1.56-3.17), as well as significantly more sensitive in detecting fever (RR: 1.90, 95% CI 1.67-2.17), gastrointestinal problems (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.20), and injuries (RR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.24). Sensitivities were also significantly higher when the Self-Report Tool performance was compared to diagnostic codes, with a sensitivity rate ratio of 4.42 (95% CI 3.45-5.68) for fever, 1.70 (95% CI 1.49-1.93) for respiratory problems, 1.15 (95% CI 1.04-1.27) for gastrointestinal problems, 2.02 (95% CI 1.42-2.87) for dermatologic problems, and 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.11) for injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Disease category assignment based on patient-reported information was significantly more sensitive in correctly identifying a disease category than data currently used by national and regional disease surveillance systems.

Impact of patient-centered decision support on quality of asthma care in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Communication barriers between parents of children with asthma and clinical emergency department (ED) providers and subsequent underrecognition of chronicity and severity impede improvements in disease management for patients with asthma in the ED setting. The asthma kiosk, a novel patient-driven decision-support tool, provides ED clinicians with tailored recommendations for guideline-based treatment. We evaluated the impact of the asthma kiosk on measures of quality during ED care, specifically, parent-reported satisfaction with dimensions of care related to communication and providers' adoption of guideline-endorsed processes of care. METHODS: A clinical trial composed of a baseline and an intervention period was conducted at a single tertiary care pediatric ED. Eligible participants were English- or Spanish-speaking parents of children who were 1 to 12 years of age and had a respiratory complaint and history of asthma. Parents used the kiosk to report children's symptoms, current medications, and unmet needs. During a 2-month baseline, no output from the kiosk was shared, and usual care proceeded. During a 3-month intervention that followed a 1-week run-in period, the output was shared with ED clinicians. All parents completed a telephone follow-up interview 1 week after discharge. Primary outcomes were (1) prescription of controller medication to patients who had persistent asthma symptoms and were not on controllers and (2) mean problem scores for 2 specific dimensions of care: information-sharing and partnership. RESULTS: Over 5 months, 1090 parent-child dyads were screened and 430 were eligible. A total of 286 (66.5%) of 430 parents enrolled in the trial. The kiosk generated severity classifications for 264 (92.3%) of 286 children. A total of 131 parents enrolled during baseline, 13 during a 1-week test phase, and 142 during intervention. Baseline participants were older (mean age: 5.3 years) compared with intervention (4.4 years) but did not differ on chronic severity, current use of controllers, or race. The total number of prescribed inhaled corticosteroids did not vary significantly between intervention and baseline (9 of 50 vs 4 of 43). Providers did prescribe inhaled fluticasone to eligible patients more often during intervention than baseline (9 of 50 vs 2 of 43). The number of reported information problems was unchanged between the baseline and intervention periods. The mean number of partnership problems increased from a mean of 1.5 (SD: 1.9) at baseline to a mean of 1.9 (SD: 1.4) during the intervention. This difference was marginally significant after adjustment for child gender, age, and severity category. When ED providers acted on kiosk data, reports of information problems were fewer (0.6 +/- 0.8) than when no action was taken (1.1 +/- 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: The asthma kiosk demonstrated small and variable impact on quality. Physicians' nonuse of kiosk-generated recommendations may explain the limited impact of the intervention.