Speech perception in noise, working memory, and attention in children: A scoping review.

PURPOSE: Speech perception in noise is an everyday occurrence for adults and children alike. The factors that influence how well individuals cope with noise during spoken communication are not well understood, particularly in the case of children. This article aims to review the available evidence on how working memory and attention play a role in children's speech perception in noise, how characteristics of measures affect results, and how this relationship differs in non-typical populations. METHOD: This article is a scoping review of the literature available on PubMed. Forty articles were included for meeting the inclusion criteria of including children as participants, some measure of speech perception in noise, some measure of attention and/or working memory, and some attempt to establish relationships between the measures. Findings were charted and presented keeping in mind how they relate to the research questions. RESULTS: The majority of studies report that attention and especially working memory are involved in speech perception in noise by children. We provide an overview of the impact of certain task characteristics on findings across the literature, as well as how these affect non-typical populations. CONCLUSION: While most of the work reviewed here provides evidence suggesting that working memory and attention are important abilities employed by children in overcoming the difficulties imposed by noise during spoken communication, methodological variability still prevents a clearer picture from emerging.

Contrasting behavioral looking procedures: a case study on infant speech segmentation.

This paper compared three different procedures common in infant speech perception research: a headturn preference procedure (HPP) and a central-fixation (CF) procedure with either automated eye-tracking (CF-ET) or manual coding (CF-M). In theory, such procedures all measure the same underlying speech perception and learning mechanisms and the choice between them should ideally be irrelevant in unveiling infant preference. However, the ManyBabies study (ManyBabies Consortium, 2019), a cross-laboratory collaboration on infants' preference for child-directed speech, revealed that choice of procedure can modulate effect sizes. Here we examined whether procedure also modulates preference in paradigms that add a learning phase prior to test: a speech segmentation paradigm. Such paradigms are particularly important for studying the learning mechanisms infants can employ for language acquisition. We carried out the same familiarization-then-test experiment with the three different procedures (32 unique infants per procedure). Procedures were compared on various factors, such as overall effect, average looking time and drop-out rate. The key observations are that the HPP yielded a larger familiarity preference, but also reported larger drop-out rates. This raises questions about the generalizability of results. We argue that more collaborative research into different procedures in infant preference experiments is required in order to interpret the variation in infant preferences more accurately.