RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Reticulocyte count and novel derived parameters provide insight into the effectiveness of erythropoiesis and may be useful tools in the classification and diagnosis of anemias. However, there is no standardisation, so we consider it necessary that each laboratory evaluates the parameters according to its own methodology and instrumentation and establishes its own reference ranges. Our aim was to establish the reference intervals (RIs) of reticulocyte profile provided by the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 haematological autoanalyzer in our reference population. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-five healthy adults (18 to 62 years) were included. Subjects were collected from the blood donation centre of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain) upon informed consent. Whole blood was collected and assayed for 14 haematological parameters on the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 analyzer in the haematology laboratory of the Clinical Analysis Department. RIs were established as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP28-A3c guidelines using three different statistical approaches. RESULTS: RIs estimated using the non-parametric method and the Harrell-Davis bootstrap method were very similar. RIs estimated by the robust method were narrower. Gender partitioning was required for two haematological parameters (low haemoglobin density (LHD) and microcytic anaemia factor (MAF)). The rest of the parameters did not need to be partitioned according to Lahti's method. CONCLUSION: RIs have been established for 14 hematologic parameters of the reticulocyte profile for the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 haematology analyzer using a healthy cohort of adult subjects.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is a new biomarker used as an early indicator of sepsis (ESId). It is often aids in the identification of patients who may develop sepsis. This study aims to establish the MDW reference interval (RI) within the healthy population of blood donors using EDTA-K2 as anticoagulant. Many hospitals use this biomarker as a means of identifying patients who present to the hospital with sepsis. METHODS: A total of 274 samples obtained from healthy donors were analyzed. MDW measurements were taken within 2â¯h post-extraction. The RI was estimated using various statistical methodologies, including the recommended CLSI EP28-A3c guideline, non-parametric and robust methods, along with the Harrell-Davis bootstrap method applied to the entire sample. RESULTS: The RI estimated through non-parametric method was 14.77 CI90â¯% (14.36-14.97)-21.13 CI90â¯% (20.89-21.68); RI using the robust method was 15.64-19.05 and RI using the Harrell-Davis bootstrap method was 14.73 CI90â¯% (14.53-14.92)-21.14 CI90â¯% (20.88-21.40). CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical applicability, we recommend utilizing the RI derived from the non-parametric method, aligning with the CLSI recommendations. Furthermore, we consider that our results can be taken as a reference in other laboratories that serve a population similar to our study cohort.
