[Quantitative assessment of fungal risk in the case of construction works in healthcare establishments: Proposed indicators for the determination of the impact of management precautions on the risk of fungal infection]. / Appréciation quantitative du risque fongique en cas de travaux en établissements de santé : propositions d'indicateurs d'impact des mesures de gestion du risque infectieux fongique.

Construction works in healthcare establishments produce airborne fungal spores and considerably increase the risk of exposure of immunosuppressed patients. It is necessary to reinforce protective measures, or even to implement specific precautions, during this critical phase. The aim of these precautions is to protect both those areas, which are susceptible to dust, and patients at risk of a fungal infection particularly invasive aspergillosis. When construction works are planned in healthcare establishments, the first step consists in the characterisation of the environmental fungal risk and the second one in proposing risk management methods. It is then essential to establish impact indicators in order to evaluate the risk management precautions applied. The working group promoted by the French societies of medical mycology and hospital hygiene (SFMM & SF2H) details here both environmental and epidemiological impact indicators that can be used.

[Infection and cancer: general information and specific questions]. / Infection et cancer: notions générales et questions actuelles.

The main risk factors of infectious complications in cancer patients result from immune deficiency more or less related to cancer. Prognosis is related to the type and grade of the underlying disease. Prospective studies should be conducted to update data on the frequency of infections, morbidity and mortality (expert agreement). Prospective studies are needed to follow the epidemiology in cancer patients, particularly in neutropenic patients (expert agreement). Prospective studies should be conducted to determine prognosis factors allowing precise recognition of "low-risk" neutropenic patients with fever who could benefit from home care (expert agreement). When infection is suspected, the first criterion determining the therapeutic attitude concern signs of gravity requiring emergency care (septic shock). Beyond this situation, the first criterion determining the therapeutic attitude is the severity of the neutropenia. Microbial diagnosis is essential for initiating and later adapting anti-infectious treatment as well as for assessing efficacy.

[Standards, options and recommendations for good practice in hemoculture in cancerology]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations pour une bonne pratique des hémocultures en cancérologie.

Excepting emergency and aplasia: two to three blood samples should be draw for culture an hour apart within a 24 period (standard). For emergency or aplasia: two to three blood samples should be drawn for culture before initiating early antibiotic therapy. The delay between samples drawn from different sites should be less than one hour (standard). For patients on antibiotics: four to six blood samples should be drawn for culture within 48 hours, outside ongoing antibiotic administration. If the patient is given corticosteroids, it is recommended to draw two or three blood samples in case of deterioration (agreement of the experts). Rigorous aseptic techniques must be used (standard). Culture media are chosen according to the institution's microbial ecology (standard). The volume of blood drawn should be adapted to the system used (standard). Culture positivity is determined at 24 to 48 hours.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for the surveillance and the prevention of cross infections in oncology. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations (SOR) pour la surveillance et la prévention des infections nosocomiales en cancérologie.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the prevention and the surveillance of cross infection in oncology. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 106 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: 1) Criteria of infection status and nosocomiality defined by the Centers for Infectious Diseases (CDC) and Prevention and the Superior Council of Public Hygiene (CSHPF) are not adapted and have to be redefined in oncology. 2) The epidemiology of nosocomial infections in oncology is not well known but their incidence seems to be higher. Numerous risk factors of cross infections coexist in cancer patients, among which the duration and depth of neutropenia. 3) Surveillance and prevention of cross infection are compulsory and were taken into account in the accreditation of hospitals. Obligation is expressed in terms of means and results. 4) The objectives of the cross infection surveillance are to detect major problems and critic situations, to guide probabilistic antibiotic therapy and to assess the effectiveness of the infections control. The surveillance means consist in prevalence and incidence survey, punctually and continuously conducted. 5) The three specific behaviors to be adopted to prevent cross infections are to control: all the patients, infected patients carrying multiresistant bacteria, immunodepressed patients. 6) Standards of care have to be applied to a/l patients with cancer. 7) It is necessary to add particular septic cares for the patients infected with micro-organisms indicated on reference lists or carrying multiresistant bacteria. 8) The only objective of the protective isolation of immunodepressed cancer patients is to reduce the cross infection. There is no standard behavior for the indications and the modalities of protective isolation. The prevention behaviors to be taken are defined by expert agreements.

[Standards, Options, and Recommendations for the management of brief neutropenias. Fedération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations pour la prise en charge des neutropénies courtes.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR), initiated in 1993, is a collaborative project between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcomes for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary experts group, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical practice guideline for the management of neutropenic cancer patients (excluding prolonged neutropenia). METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search using Medline and Current Contents (up to February 1997) and personal reference lists. The main end points considered were mortality, morbidity, risk factors, fever, source of infection, microbiological documentation, incidence and length of hospital stays, quality of life, efficacy of treatment, safety and costs. Once the guideline was defined, the document was submitted to 48 reviewers for peer review and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres for review and agreement. RESULTS: The key recommendations are: 1) before receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, patients must be informed of potential risks and precautions to observe; 2) non-febrile neutropenic patients can be followed at home (except specific context); antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended; 3) initial empirical antibiotic therapy for febrile patients is mandatory, whether associated beta-lactam and aminoglycoside, or monotherapy with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam (except in case of septic shock or pneumopathy). A glycopeptide can be added in case of overt catheter-related or cutaneous infection, in case of microbiologically documented infection with a oxacillin-resistant Gram positive bacteria, or in case of persistent fever in a clinically deteriorating patient; 4) at the present time, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the management of febrile neutropenic patients at home. We recommend participation in studies to identify predicting factors of low-risk patients and to assess the feasibility and safety of early discharge and home therapy.

[Does automatized disinfection of traps by chlorine reduce water related contamination?]. / La désinfection automatisée des siphons par le chlore réduit-elle la contamination d'origine hydrique?

Sanitary U bends are very contaminated places from a microbiological point of view. They may even be dangerous for immunocompromised patients. Although daily chloride disinfection of U-bends is ineffective, it seems to work when performed after each use of sanitary devices. On line disinfection reduces not only U-bend bacteriological contamination but also all surrounding surfaces.

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis as a new epidemiological tool for monitoring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit.

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of bacterial DNA was used in a 1-month epidemiological study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a 15-bed Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Patient and hospital staff carriage as well as distribution of MRSA in the ICU environment were investigated, and a total of 3802 samples produced 175 isolates. The stability and the reproducibility of the PFGE method were satisfactory. Moreover, the plasmid content of the strains so far examined had no influence on the PFGE profiles of the MRSA strains. The polymorphic profiles observed also account for the use of this method as an epidemiological tool for investigating MRSA. Among 30 patients who stayed more than 4 days in the unit, PFGE analysis showed 11 episodes of colonization in nine patients, whereas lysotyping and plasmid DNA analysis demonstrated only eight and seven such episodes in the same patients, respectively. The combination of PFGE with lysotyping and plasmid analysis may provide a greater discriminatory capacity between MRSA isolates.

[Prevention of exogenous respiratory infection]. / La prévention de l'infection respiratoire exogène.

The exogenous respiratory infections have two transmission channels, the airborne and the handborne ways, and two entrance doors, tracheotomy and intubation. Indeed, most often, contamination of the oropharynx occurs prior to the bacterial pneumonia. These microorganisms are isolated on healthy carries, on linen, furniture, air-conditioning system and so on... Special precautions are recommended as disinfection or sterilization of ventilators equipment changing circuits every 48 hours, using sterile water in humidifiers, and rigorous aseptic technic for tracheal suctions. An experimental study shows that microorganisms present in the humidifier disseminate through the circuit with the airstream. Therefore septic isolation of patients with pneumonia and disinfection of the room after his departure are considered as essential measure of prevention.

[Evaluation of the cost-efficacy ratio of Pall BB 22 15 filters for the bacterial protection of anesthesia circuits]. / Evaluation du rapport coût-efficacité des filtres Pall BB 22 15 dans la protection bactérienne des circuits d'anesthésie.

The aim of this study is to assess wether the use of the bacteriological filter Pall BB 22 15 placed on the Y piece of the anesthesia equipment decreases contamination and furthermore to evaluate the cost of this practice versus changing anesthetic circuits after every patient. Randomized trials are conducted with three "Engström" machines in three cardiac surgery operating rooms. The Y pieces were examined with qualitative and quantitative bacteriological analysis. Use filters is less expensive than changing circuit for each patient for a comparable efficacy.

[Infectious enterocolitis in intensive care patients fed by nasogastric tube]. / Entérocolites infectieuses chez des malades de réanimation alimentés par sonde nasogastrique.

Infectious enterocolitis sometimes spreads through intensive care units, the origin being contamination by "drips". A 9 month study concerning patients fed by nasogastric "drip" revealed 70 p. 100 of cases of severe diarrhea. Stool cultures confirmed the infectious origin of this diarrhea in 66 p. 100 cases. Virtually all of the suspect drip containers and fluids contained the organisms found in the stool culture, with a concentration of 10(6)-10(9) per ml/foodstuff. Enquiry revealed that contamination of these drips occurred above all in the kitchen at the time of preparation (poorly washed material, personnel often unaware of elementary hygiene). The great vulnérability of such intensive care patients predisposes them to infection of this type and the limit of danger for them is as low as 10(4) organisms per ml/foodstuff. Solutions concerning hygiene in preparation were tried with success (drips then containing only 50-100 organisms per ml/foodstuff.

[Mortality factors in infectious diseases in a surgical intensive care unit]. / Etude des facteurs de mortalité infectieuse dans un service de réanimation chirurgicale.

Among 350 patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit between 1.1.77 and 31.9.77, their profile and septic course being defined, two populations were studied: -- the first involved 49 patients dying of infection during their stay in the department; -- the second involved 132 patients developing a non lethal infectious syndrome. Comparative study of these two patients groups made it easier to understand why, in the same department and apparently with the same kind of care, certain patients die of infection and others do not. It was thus attempted to demonstrate certain difference between the two groups in terms of biometric data, predictable risk factors, the type of underlying pathology and the nature and course of the infectious process. Finally, the role played by the intensive care unit in the onset of these deaths of infectious cause is considered.