A Phase II Multicentre, Open-Label, Proof-of-Concept Study of Tasquinimod in Hepatocellular, Ovarian, Renal Cell, and Gastric Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Tasquinimod is a small molecule with immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic, and anti-metastatic properties that targets the tumor microenvironment. This study aimed to obtain a clinical proof of concept that tasquinimod was active and tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This early stopping design, open-label, proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluated the clinical activity of tasquinimod in four independent cohorts of patients with advanced hepatocellular (n = 53), ovarian (n = 55), renal cell (n = 38), and gastric (n = 21) cancers. Tasquinimod was given orally every day (0.5 mg/day for at least 2 weeks, with dose increase to 1 mg/day) until radiological progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 criteria, intolerable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate according to RECIST 1.1 by central assessment. RESULTS: Interim futility analyses at 8 weeks (6 weeks for the gastric cancer cohort) found adequate clinical activity of tasquinimod only in the hepatocellular cohort and recruitment to the other three cohorts was stopped. PFS rates were 26.9% at 16 weeks, 7.3% at 24 weeks, 13.2% at 16 weeks, and 9.5% at 12 weeks, respectively, in hepatocellular, ovarian, renal cell, and gastric cancer cohorts. The pre-defined PFS threshold was not reached in the hepatocellular cancer cohort at the second stage of the trial. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (48.5%), nausea (34.1%), decreased appetite (31.7%), and vomiting (24.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate clinical activity of tasquinimod in heavily pre-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular, ovarian, renal cell, and gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01743469.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Tasquinimod in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Tasquinimod, a novel oral therapy targeting the tumor microenvironment, significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This phase III study was conducted to confirm the phase II results and to detect an overall survival (OS) benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC and evidence of bone metastases were assigned (2:1) to receive tasquinimod once per day or placebo until progression or toxicity. The primary end point was radiographic PFS (rPFS; time from random assignment to radiologic progression or death) per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria and RECIST 1.1. The study had 99.9% power to detect an rPFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 with a two-sided alpha error of .05 and 80% power to detect a target HR of 0.8 for OS, the key secondary end point. RESULTS: In all, 1,245 patients were randomly assigned to either tasquinimod (n = 832) or placebo (n = 413) between March 2011 and December 2012 at 241 sites in 37 countries. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups: median age, 71 years; Karnofsky performance status ≥ 90%, 77.3%; and visceral metastases, 21.1%. Estimated median rPFS by central review was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.2 months) with tasquinimod and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 5.5 months) with placebo (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.75; P < .001). Median OS was 21.3 months (95% CI, 19.5 to 23.0 months) with tasquinimod and 24.0 months (95% CI, 21.4 to 26.9 months) with placebo (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.28; P = .25). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were more frequent with tasquinimod (42.8% v 33.6%), the most common being anemia, fatigue, and cancer pain. CONCLUSION: In chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC, tasquinimod significantly improved rPFS compared with placebo. However, no OS benefit was observed.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of IV vinflunine in combination with gemcitabine for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Chemonaive patients.

INTRODUCTION: Vinflunine (Javlor) has shown significant antitumour activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We propose to define the recommended dose of vinflunine in combination with gemcitabine for treatment of advanced NSCLC in chemonaive patients. METHODS: A phase I and pharmacokinetic study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to establish the recommended dose of vinflunine (VFL) administered on day 1 every 21 days combined with gemcitabine given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in this study. Three patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity, with constipation in one patient, hypertension in one patient, and constipation and febrile neutropenia in one patient. The combination of VFL 320 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. The recommended dose was established at the dose of VFL 320 mg/m² combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m². Neither VFL nor gemcitabine seemed to be influencing the pharmacokinetics of each other. All patients were evaluable for tumor response. Seven presented a partial response and eight experienced a stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of VFL 320 mg/m² administered on day 1 combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks is established as the RD and was shown to be active in these chemonaive NSCLC patients.

Phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous vinflunine in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter phase I/II trial of vinflunine administered in combination with cisplatin at 80 mg/m(2) was conducted in order to determine the dose-limiting toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended dose of the combination. An eventual mutual pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction when vinflunine and cisplatin were coadministered was also evaluated. The study was also intended to define the response rate of vinflunine in combination with cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the recommended dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC not amenable to curable treatment or stage IV disease. Patients may have had previous surgery for NSCLC but were to be chemonaive and have at least 1 bidimensional measurable lesion outside an irradiated area. RESULTS: The recommended dose was established at cisplatin 80 mg/m2 combined with vinflunine 320 mg/m(2). No unexpected adverse events were seen. Pharmacokinetic analysis supported the absence of mutual pharmacokinetic interaction when vinflunine and cisplatin are given in combination. Treatment of 53 patients at this recommended dose demonstrated a tumor response rate of 32.1% in the intent-to-treat population; disease control was achieved in 79.2% of the patients. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated at 5 months and 10.4 months, respectively, and the 1-year survival rate was 43.4%. CONCLUSION: These results place the vinflunine/cisplatin combination among the most active doublets in this treatment setting and warrant further development in phase III trials of first-line treatment of patients with advanced metastatic NSCLC.

Phase 2 study of single-agent IV vinflunine as third-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer after failure of anthracycline-/taxane-based chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: A multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous vinflunine as third-line treatment in patients with progressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after failure of anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with MBC, relapsing after receiving 2 previous treatments for advanced disease, including both anthracyclines and taxanes, received 320 mg/m(2) of vinflunine once every 3 weeks (median number of 2.5 cycles, range: 1-13). RESULTS: According to an independent radiologist, the response rate was 12.5% (95% CI: 5.2-24.1) and 14% (95% CI: 5.3-27.9) (6 partial responses) in the treated and evaluable populations, respectively. Disease control was achieved in 42.9% and 51.2% of the patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-4.0 months) with a median overall survival of 11.4 months (95% CI: 7.4-14.2 months). Duration of response was 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.6 months, upper limit not reached). Leukopenia was the most frequent hematologic toxicity, with grade 3/4 severity in 49.1% of the patients. Grade 3 neutropenia in 30.9%, grade 4 in 40.0% of patients, febrile neutropenia (5.4%), and 1 case of neutropenia infection (1.8%) were reported. Other grade 3 toxicities included anemia (5.5%), fatigue (14.3%), and constipation (7.1%), which were noncumulative. The adverse events associated with vinflunine were predictable and manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Vinflunine is an active and well-tolerated agent as third-line treatment of patients with MBC after failure of anthracycline- and taxane-based therapy. These results warrant further investigation of vinflunine monotherapy or in combination for the treatment of MBC.

Phase II study of vinorelbine (alternating intravenous and oral) in combination with docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Combination of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine and docetaxel was shown to be feasible and effective in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In an effort to improve patient convenience, we investigated in first-line treatment a regimen alternating i.v. and oral vinorelbine in combination with docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients (median age, 53 years) with MBC received a maximum of 6 cycles consisting of i.v. vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) given on day 1, and oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) on day 15 every 3 weeks in an open-label, multicentre phase II study (recommended dose established in phase I study [1]). RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of the patient had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 78% presented visceral involvement. Twenty-four responses were documented and validated by an independent panel review, yielding response rates of 49% (95% CI: 34-64) in the 49 enrolled patients and 55.8% (95% CI: 40-71) in the 43 evaluable patients. Median duration of response was 9.4 months. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 5.5 and 33.2 months, respectively. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity but complications were uncommon, four patients having experienced febrile neutropenia and one having developed neutropenic infection. Other frequently reported adverse events included alopecia, fatigue, stomatitis, constipation, diarrhoea and nausea, which were rarely severe. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine in combination with docetaxel is effective and manageable. Vinorelbine i.v. per oral day 1 per day 15-docetaxel day 1 every 3 weeks represents a convenient option to combine docetaxel and vinorelbine for the palliative treatment of MBC.

Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemo-radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: final results of an international phase II trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin in combination with vinorelbine has reported an optimal activity/tolerance ratio when used in combination with radiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. The currently available oral formulation of vinorelbine should be easier to use assuming a similar activity profile. An international phase II trial with vinorelbine oral and cisplatin as induction followed by oral vinorelbine and cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy was implemented to evaluate the efficacy in terms of objective response (OR) following this combination as primary end point and duration or response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety as secondary endpoints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included patients between 18 and 75 years, with histologically proven untreated locally advanced inoperable stage IIIA/IIIB (supraclavicular lymph nodes and pleural effusion excluded) non-small cell lung cancer, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function, Karnofsky performance status >/=80%. Patients were treated with oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m day 1,8 cycle 1 and 80 mg/m day 1,8 cycle 2 (if no grade 3-4 toxicity) and cisplatin 80 mg/m day 1 every 3 weeks for 2 cycles as induction. Patients without progression received oral vinorelbine 40 mg/m day 1, 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m day 1 every 3 weeks for 2 more cycles with radiotherapy 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks. RESULTS: Patient and disease characteristics (n = 54) included: median age 57 years; female sex 24%; stage IIIA 48% and IIIB 52%; Squamous carcinoma 59%, Karnofsky performance status 100% (range, 80-100%) 50%, patients >/=5% weight loss at baseline 7%. Relative dose intensities of oral vinorelbine/cisplatin were 86%/93% and 97%/98% at induction and in combination with radiotherapy, respectively. Forty-one patients (76%) increased oral vinorelbine from 60 to 80 mg/m day during induction (reasons for nonescalation: hematological 7 patients, nonhematological 2 patients, error 4 patients). After two cycles of chemotherapy induction, the OR intent-to-treat in the 54 patients was 37%. Toxicities during induction were as follows: Neutropenia G3-4 (28%), Febrile Neutropenia (7%), nausea G3 (11%), vomiting G3-4 (9%), anorexia G3 (4%), diarrhea G4 (2%), constipation G3 (2%). Forty-seven out of 54 (87%) patients received concomitant chemo-radiotherapy.Median radiotherapy delivered dose was 66 Gy. Tolerance: 9% G3 Neutropenia; 4% G3 dysphagia/radiation; 2% G3 radiation dermatitis. Late pulmonary fibrosis was reported in one patient (1.8%). One month after completion of chemo-radiotherapy, the overall OR intent-to-treat in the 54 patients was 54% (95% CI: 40-67%). With a median follow-up of 37 months (95% CI: 34-41) the median progression-free survival and overall survival were: 12.5 (95% CI: 9.6-16.4) and 23.4 (95% CI: 17.6-29.8) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin is an effective combination in stage IIIA/IIIB patients. The excellent tolerance profile allowed to complete concomitant chemo-radiotherapy in 87% of patients. Oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin is a new and promising option that facilitates the administration of concomitant chemo-radiotherapy with high rates of treatment completion.