Preoperative Sizing to Lower In-Stent Restenosis in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: The primary treatment for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) is angioplasty stenting. Its main complication is in-stent restenosis. Poor selection of stent dimensions has been identified as a factor contributing to early in-stent restenosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether the implantation of stents, selected based on arterial morphological reconstruction using a sizing software program, reduces the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. The study also aims to evaluate the potential benefits of routine preoperative sizing. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2020, all patients treated for PAOD through scheduled angioplasty stenting in our department were included in the study. Using systematic preoperative computed tomography angiography, precise reconstruction and sizing were performed to select the ideal length and diameter of stents, resulting in the selection of a so-called IDEAL stent. During the procedure, the surgeon implanted either the IDEAL stent or a different one, named the ACTUAL stent, based on intraoperative data and/or availability. We compared the in-stent restenosis rate between IDEAL and ACTUAL stents. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the overall characteristics between the IDEAL and ACTUAL stent groups. The in-stent restenosis rate at 1 year was 13% (N = 28/212, P = 0.994) in the IDEAL group and 17% (N = 25/149, P = 0.994) in the ACTUAL group. Among the ACTUAL stents, a total of 19.6% of stents with a diameter mismatch when chosen based on arteriography showed a significantly higher restenosis rate during the first year of follow-up (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not demonstrate a significant difference in 1-year restenosis rate between the IDEAL and the ACTUAL stent groups. It specifically revealed the significant impact of diameter selection on the intrastent restenosis rate during the first year of follow-up. Stents chosen based on arteriographic criteria, which exhibited diameter discordance, compared to the IDEAL stents group selected using sizing reconstructions, could be either oversized or undersized. This led to a significantly higher restenosis rate at 1 year postoperatively.

Surgical Management of Carotid Body Tumors: Experience of Two Centers.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare but require surgical resection given their potential for growth and malignancy. For some surgical teams, tumor hypervascularity justifies preoperative embolization to facilitate resection and limit complications. The objective of our study was to evaluate 2 different practices of surgical resection with or without preoperative embolization in a 2-center cohort. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients who underwent CBT surgery, from January 2011 to June 2019, were divided into 2 groups, as to whether they were (embolized CBT [ECBT]) or not (nonembolized CBT [NECBT]) preoperatively embolized. Both groups were compared specifically according to the duration of operation, postoperative complications, and length of stay. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with a mean age of 48.5 ± 14.3 years were included. In the series, 23 CBTs were resected: 13 were embolized preoperatively; the mean time between embolization and surgery was 2.62 ± 1.50 days. Both groups were comparable based on characteristics of population and tumor, with a mean size of 33.2 ± 11.9 mm. We noted a significant increase in operation duration in the ECBT group: 151 min (±40.9) vs. 87.0 min (±21); P < 0.01. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding cranial nerve (50% vs. 46%; P = 1), sympathetic nervous system (20% vs. 23%; P = 1), or vascular nerve (20% vs. 23%; P = 0.18) complications. No cerebrovascular accident was identified. The length of stay was 3.60 days (±1.78) vs. 3.73 days (±1.19; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: This study reflects the experience of 2 centers in the management of CBT which is a rare pathology with no standardized treatment. Our series showed no significant difference between the ECBT and NECBT groups regarding postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The reduction in operating time in the NECBT group remains to be demonstrated.

Artificial intelligence-based predictive models in vascular diseases.

Cardiovascular disease represents a source of major health problems worldwide, and although medical and technical advances have been achieved, they are still associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Personalized medicine would benefit from novel tools to better predict individual prognosis and outcomes after intervention. Artificial intelligence (AI) has brought new insights to cardiovascular medicine, especially with the use of machine learning techniques that allow the identification of hidden patterns and complex associations in health data without any a priori assumptions. This review provides an overview on the use of artificial intelligence-based prediction models in vascular diseases, specifically focusing on aortic aneurysm, lower extremity arterial disease, and carotid stenosis. Potential benefits include the development of precision medicine in patients with vascular diseases. In addition, the main challenges that remain to be overcome to integrate artificial intelligence-based predictive models in clinical practice are discussed.

Comparative Evaluation of Two Paclitaxel-Coated Stents in an Experimental Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Unlike paclitaxel-coated balloons, pre-clinical data comparing different paclitaxel-coated stents (PCSs) are weak. The study objective was to compare the features of the 2 main PCSs: Eluvia® (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) versus ZilverPTX® (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN). METHOD: Analysis was carried out on 12 pigs divided into 2 groups: Eluvia® (n=6) and ZilverPTX® (n=6). The pigs received the PCS corresponding to their group in each external iliac artery and were paired one by one, to examine 6 different post-implantation timepoints: after 30 minutes, 6 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days. The paclitaxel concentration measurements and the histological analysis were carried out under blind testing on the plasma, arterial, lymph node, and muscle samples. A linear regression model and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test were used to study the variables. RESULTS: The plasma paclitaxel rate decrease over 24 hours after PCS implantation was significantly different between the two groups, expressed by the correlation coefficient 0.19 (0.14-0.23; p<0.001) with an undetectable concentration at the 10th hour for Eluvia® versus 3 days for ZilverPTX®. Significantly higher paclitaxel concentrations with ZilverPTX® PCS were observed in muscle samples at each timepoint: extensor digitorum brevis 3.2 (1.17-5.23; p=0.005), biceps femoris 4.27 (2.27-6.26; p<0.001), semi-tendinosus 3.79 (1.85-5.73; p=0.001), tibialis anterior 3.0 (1.37-4.64; p=0.001), and in the femoral nodes 2.27±1.74 ng/g versus 0.14±0.13 ng/g (p<0.001). Histological analysis revealed a trend for more marked intimal inflammation in the arteries stented with ZilverPTX® (p=0.063), especially after the 7th and 14th days. CONCLUSION: Such a difference in the concentration of paclitaxel in the plasma, muscles, and lymph nodes between the two stents was higher than expected based on differences in device design. The clinical consequences of these results remain to be elucidated, particularly regarding the concerning presence of paclitaxel in muscles and adjacent lymph nodes. CLINICAL IMPACT: This experimental study compares 2 paclitaxel-coated stents. It demonstrates that differences in stent designs and drug features (coatings and concentrations) translate into differences in terms of concentrations of paclitaxel in the plasma, muscles, and lymph nodes. Our results favor the Eluvia® stent over the ZilverPTX® stent, although more studies are required to confirm this conclusion.

A Prospective Survey of the Incidence of Cranial and Cervical Nerve Injuries After Carotid Surgery.

BACKGROUND: To prospectively evaluate the involvement of the cranial nerves and cervical plexus branches during carotid surgery and to look for risk factors. METHODS: All patients (n = 50) undergoing carotid endarterectomy between June 1st and October 31st, 2016 in our center were evaluated prospectively. A complete neurological examination was done before the intervention then daily until hospital discharge, and then at 2 months, 6 months and 1 year. A nasal endoscopy was systematically performed postoperatively before discharge by an ear, nose, and throat specialist. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (52%) had at least one damaged nerve immediately after surgery. There were 15 cases involving the VII nerve (30%), 12 the C2-C3 branches (24%), 7 the XII nerve (14%), and 2 the X nerve (4%). At 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year, 22%, 16%, and 8% of lesions remained, respectively. We found no independent factor for nerve damage at 6 months or 1 year. In the case of dysphonia and/or dysphagia without recurrent nerve paralysis, 6 hematomas and 7 laryngeal edemas were identified under nasal endoscopy and all healed without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study showed cranial and cervical nerve injury to be much more frequent than expected in the short-term, when assessed by independent ear, nose, and throat and nasal endoscopy exam. Though mainly transient, these lesions can cause post-operative functional discomfort and must be disclosed preoperatively to the patient, in view of the judicialization of health care.