New Diagnostic Cutoffs for Adrenal Insufficiency After Cosyntropin Stimulation Using Abbott Architect Cortisol Immunoassay.

INTRODUCTION: The accurate interpretation of the cosyntropin (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH]) stimulation test requires method- and assay-specific cutoffs of the level of cortisol. Compared with a historical cutoff (18 µg/dL) for polyclonal antibody-based immunoassays, lower thresholds were proposed for the Roche Elecsys II assay, which uses a monoclonal antibody. However, cutoffs for other commonly adopted, monoclonal antibody-based cortisol assays were not yet available. Here, we established the thresholds for the level of cortisol specific to the Abbott Architect immunoassay by comparing the measurements of the level of cortisol using 3 immunoassays. METHODS: The ACTH stimulation test was performed in patients with suspected adrenal insufficiency (n = 50). The serum cortisol level was measured using the Abbott Architect, Roche Elecsys II, and Siemens Centaur assays. The results of the Abbott assay were also compared with those of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to derive new diagnostic thresholds for the Abbott assay using the polyclonal antibody-based Siemens assay as the reference method. RESULTS: The concentrations of cortisol measured using the Abbott assay were similar to those measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and the Roche Elecsys II assay but significantly lower than those measured using the Siemens assay. The optimized threshold for cortisol using the Abbott assay was 14.6 µg/dL at 60 minutes after stimulation (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 96%) and 13.2 µg/dL at 30 minutes after stimulation (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 89%). CONCLUSION: We recommend a threshold of 14.6 µg/dL for the level of cortisol at 60 minutes after ACTH stimulation for the Abbott assay. In comparison with the historical threshold of 18 µg/dL, the application of the new cutoff may significantly decrease false-positive results due to ACTH stimulation testing. The use of assay-specific cutoffs will be essential for reducing misclassification and overtreatment in patients with suspected adrenal insufficiency.

Method Performance of Bicarbonate and Electrolytes by Use of Duodenal Fluid for Assessment of Exocrine Pancreatic Function.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is challenging for both clinicians and laboratories. Indirect pancreatic function tests such as serum trypsinogen, fecal elastase, and fecal fat measurements are moderately sensitive for diagnosis of advanced chronic pancreatitis but show reduced sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of early disease. An alternative is the endoscopic pancreatic function test, which uses duodenal secretions after administration of IV secretin. Samples are collected at various times via the endoscopic tube and then analyzed for bicarbonate, sodium, potassium, and chloride. METHODS: Precision, linearity, method comparison, and stability studies were performed on the Beckman Coulter AU5822 chemistry analyzer with duodenal fluid. Comparison with the Vitros 4600 dry slide chemistry instrument was used to interrogate differences between methods. RESULTS: All assays produced a CV <2% without any measurable effects from the endoscopy fluid matrix and showed acceptable imprecision near the limit of detection (CV < 5%). All analytes showed linear dilution across the analytical measuring range. All the calculated error biases from dilutions were within 50% of the CLIA-allowable error for serum for each of the respective analytes. The calculated slopes ranged from 0.841 to 1.274 when compared to the Vitros 4600. Stability studies demonstrated that sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate remained stable after storage at -20 °C and after multiple freeze-thaw cycles. The percent change for all analytes was <5% mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: The AU5800 series demonstrated adequate performance for the analysis of bicarbonate in duodenal fluid and therefore can be used for assessment of exocrine pancreatic function. However, notable discrepancies were observed for sodium, potassium, and chloride between the AU5800 series and the Vitros 4600.