Low prevalence of communication between intensive care unit medical staff and general practitioners: A single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) have a central role in delivering care to the Australian community, which includes coordinating management of chronic diseases and treatment of patients after admission to intensive care units (ICUs). Consultations between ICUs and GPs may become increasingly relevant as patients of advancing age and chronic disease burden are admitted to ICUs. However, how frequently and for what reason such consultations occur remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and themes of consultations between ICU medical staff and GPs. METHODS: Ten years of electronic medical records in the ICU of a regional Australian hospital were searched for patient admissions documenting the terms "gp", "general p∗", or "primary care∗" anywhere throughout the record. The proportion of ICU admissions in which a consultation between ICU staff members and GPs was documented was recorded along with the reason/s for the consultation and designation (resident, registrar, consultant) of those who communicated with the GP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures included the proportion of ICU admissions with a documented consultation between ICU staff and GPs, theme of the consultation, and designation (resident, registrar, consultant) of those who communicated with the GP. RESULTS: Of 13 402 admissions to the ICU, 137 (1.02%) had a documented consultation between ICU medical staff and GPs. Most consultations (n = 116, 85%) were initiated by junior ICU medical staff members seeking clinical information from the GPs. Few consultations were to discuss goals of care (n = 10, 7.3%) or care following ICU discharge (n = 15, 11%). CONCLUSIONS: Consultations between ICU medical staff and GPs were infrequent. Further research is required on how best to integrate the health care provided by ICUs and GPs.

Ergonomic exposures and control measures associated with mass fatality decedent handling in morgues and body collection points in a New York healthcare system during COVID-19: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: In April 2020, novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) produced an ongoing mass fatality event in New York. This overwhelmed hospital morgues necessitating emergent expansion of capacity in the form of refrigerated trucks, trailers, and shipping containers referred to as body collection points (BCPs). The risks for musculoskeletal injury during routine and mass fatality mortuary operations and experiences of decedent handlers throughout the "first wave" of COVID-19 are presented along with mitigation strategies. METHODS: Awareness of the high rates of musculoskeletal injury among health care workers due to ergonomic exposures from patient handling, including heavy and repetitive manual lifting, prompted safety walkthroughs of mortuary operations at multiple hospitals within a health system in New York State by workforce safety specialists. Site visits sought to identify ergonomic exposures and ameliorate risk for injury associated with decedent handling by implementing engineering, work practice, and administrative controls. RESULTS: Musculoskeletal exposures included manual lifting of decedents to high and low surfaces, non-neutral postures, maneuvering of heavy equipment, and push/pull forces associated with the transport of decedents. DISCUSSION: Risk mitigation strategies through participatory ergonomics, education on body mechanics, development of novel handling techniques implementing friction-reducing aides, procurement of specialized equipment, optimizing BCP design, and facilitation of communication between hospital and system-wide departments are presented along with lessons learned. After-action review of health system workers' compensation data found over four thousand lost workdays due to decedent handling related incidents, which illuminates the magnitude of musculoskeletal injury risk to decedent handlers.

Comparison of pulmonary artery catheter, echocardiography, and arterial waveform analysis monitoring in predicting the hemodynamic state during and after cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial was to determine whether Flotrac Vigileo™ (FV™) provides a reliable representation of the hemodynamic state of a cardiac surgical patient population when compared to pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and echocardiography in the peril-operative period. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational trial comparing perioperative hemodynamic states using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), FV™ and PAC during and post cardiothoracic surgery. SETTING: Tertiary regional hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU). PARTICIPANTS: 50 consecutive adult cardiothoracic patients with written consent provided. INTERVENTION: Comparison of the perioperative hemodynamic states using echocardiography, FV™ and PAC was performed. Evaluation of the hemodynamic state (HDS) was performed using TEE, TTE, PAC and FV™ during and after cardiac surgery. Data were compared between the three hemodynamic assessment modalities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Predicted hemodynamic state. RESULTS: FV™ and PAC were shown to correlate poorly with TEE/TTE assessment of the hemodynamic state. Both PAC and FV™ showed significant discordance with echocardiographic assessment of the hemodynamic state. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, FV™ and PAC were shown to agree poorly with TTE/TEE assessment of the HDS in an adult cardiothoracic population. Agreement between the FV™ and PAC was also poor. Caution is recommended in interpreting isolated hemodynamic monitoring data. All hemodynamic monitoring devices have inherent sources of error. Caution is advised in interpreting any single device or measurement as a gold standard. We suggest that hemodynamic measuring devices such as FV™/PAC may act as triggers for a global hemodynamic assessment including consideration of TTE/TEE.

Improving Transfer Times for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients to a Comprehensive Stroke Center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The transfer of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) must be rapid. Delays pose an obstacle to time-sensitive stroke treatments and, therefore, increase the likelihood of exclusion from endovascular stroke therapy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the Stroke Rescue Program, with its goal of minimizing interfacility transfer delays and increasing the number of transport times completed within 60 minutes. METHODS: The Stroke Rescue Program was initiated to facilitate the rapid transfer of AIS patients from regional primary stroke centers (PSCs) to the network's CSC. The transfer process was divided into 3 time elements: transport 1 time (initial phone call from the PSC until emergency medical service [EMS] arrival at the PSC), emergency department (ED) time (EMS PSC arrival to PSC departure), and transport 2 time (PSC departure to CSC arrival). The total transport time target was set at less than 60 minutes. Protocols and procedures were implemented with a focus on decreasing the ED time. RESULTS: Comparing baseline (preimplementation) quarter (n = 21) to postproject quarter (1 year later, n = 31), the percent transported within 60 minutes increased from 62% to 81%. A statistically significant improvement was seen for both median ED time (23 minutes versus 14 minutes; U = 171, P < .01) and median total transport time (56 minutes versus 44 minutes; U = 199, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Interfacility transfer protocols minimizing the time paramedics spend in a PSC ED can significantly reduce total transfer time to a comprehensive stroke center.

A qualitative study of health problems, risk factors, and prevention among Emergency Medical Service workers.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors among Emergency Medical Service (EMS) workers are difficult to characterize and inconsistencies remain about their main health problems. OBJECTIVES: To identify main work-related health problems among EMS workers in the United States; identify risk factors at the organizational, task, and exposure level; identify prevention strategies; examine these issues between participants (EMS workers and supervisors). METHODS: Two types of qualitative research methods based on grounded theory were used: in-depth interviews with emergency medical technicians/paramedics (EMS workers) and focus groups (EMS workers and supervisors). RESULTS: Most participants reported similar health problems (musculoskeletal injuries) and the task related to these injuries, patient handling. Participants also reported similar physical exposures (ascending stairs with patients and patient weight). For organization/psychosocial factors, participants agreed that fitness, wages, breaks, and shift scheduling were linked with injuries, but overall, perceptions about these issues differed more than physical exposures. Lack of trust between EMS workers and supervisors were recurrent concerns among workers. However, not all organizational/psychosocial factors differed. EMS workers and supervisors agreed pre-employment screening could reduce injuries. Participants identified micro- and macro-level prevention opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: The grounded theory approach identified workers' main health problems, and the organizational factors and exposures linked with them. Perceptions about work organization/psychosocial exposures appeared more diverse than physical exposures. Prevention among all participants focused on mechanized equipment, but EMS workers also wanted more organizational support.

Work adjustment and readjustment of persons with mid-career onset traumatic brain injury.

This study investigated the effects of mid-career onset traumatic brain injury on work adjustment, as well as examining the utility of Hershenson's model of work adjustment. Ten clients in a head injury rehabilitation programme were intensively interviewed and completed questionnaires concerning the effect of their mid-career onset disability on their work adjustment. Information about post-traumatic work adjustment and coping was identified, collated and summarized. Results indicated that for this population work adjustment assumes a special meaning and career development becomes are development and planning process, rather than an unbroken, linear process. Results also suggested the utility of the Hershenson model for structuring studies on this specific topic and further emphasized that work adjustment development must be studied in the context of personal, family and social development.