The Use of Salvage Procedures for Wound Complications in Neuromodulation.

OBJECTIVE: Wound complications are a prevalent concern for neuromodulation procedures. While removal of the device was recommended, attempts to salvage expensive hardware have become commonplace. We examine our management in wound issues to aid in providing guidance for these situations. METHODS: We identified 40 patients over an 8-year period in a large neuromodulation practice, who underwent washout or partial salvage of hardware. We examined the efficacy of washout and partial explants on the ability to salvage the implants. Covariates including age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, anticoagulation, and device type were considered. RESULTS: There were 29 washouts and 10 partial hardware removal cases. Washouts were successful in 15/29 cases (51.7%), partial hardware removal was successful in 2/10 cases (20%), and removal with replacement was not successful (0 of 1). Washouts tended to be more successful than partial removal procedures (P = 0.08). In cases of successful washout, the average duration between infectious symptoms and washout was 7.27 ± 2.19 days. None of the demographic variables were associated with increased likelihood of washout failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a higher rate of washout failure in those who underwent partial device removal and in the presence of purulence at the surgical site. Further investigation must be conducted to determine the instances in which hardware removal is indicated to prevent failure or removal due to infection. Identification of these parameters will optimize therapeutic benefit and long-term financial impact.

Does Pre-existing Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy Increase the Risk of Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Progression?

BACKGROUND: Isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) is a common finding in mild traumatic brain injury that often results in transfer to a tertiary center. Patients prescribed blood-thinning medications (BTs) are believed to be at higher risk of clinical or radiographic worsening. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of radiographic progression and need for neurosurgical intervention in patients with tSAH who are on anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapies with those who are not. METHODS: Analysis using a retrospective cohort design identified patients older than 18 years with isolated tSAH and a Glasgow Coma Scale of 15 on admission. Clinical information including use of BTs, administration of reversal agents, radiographic progression, and need for neurosurgical intervention was collected. Patients on BTs were divided into AP, AC, and AP/AC groups based on drug type. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-four patients were included with 203 in the non-BT group and 181 in the BT group. Overall, 2.1% had worsening scans, and none required operative intervention. There was no difference in radiographic worsening between the non-BT and BT groups (2.4% vs 1.6%; P = 1.00). Crosswise comparison revealed no difference between the non-BT group and each BT subtype (AP, AP/AC, or AC). The non-BT group was more likely to have radiographic improvement than the BT group (45.8% vs 30.9%; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Neurologically intact patients on BTs with isolated tSAH are not at increased risk of radiographic progression or neurosurgical intervention. The presence of BTs should not influence management decisions for increased surveillance.

Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

The development of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of chronic diabetes that can be associated with significant disability and healthcare costs. Prompt symptom identification and aggressive glycemic control is essential in controlling the development of neuropathic complications; however, adequate pain relief remains challenging and there are considerable unmet needs in this patient population. Although guidelines have been established regarding the pharmacological management of PDN, pain control is inadequate or refractory in a high proportion of patients. Pharmacotherapy with anticonvulsants (pregabalin, gabapentin) and antidepressants (duloxetine) are common first-line agents. The use of oral opioids is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and can also lead to opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Their use is therefore discouraged. There is an emerging role for neuromodulation treatment modalities including intrathecal drug delivery, spinal cord stimulation, and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Furthermore, consideration of holistic alternative therapies such as yoga and acupuncture may augment a multidisciplinary treatment approach. This aim of this review is to focus on the current management strategies for the treatment of PDN, with a discussion of treatment rationale and practical considerations for their implementation.

Stent-in-stent technique for the management of blood blister-like basilar apex aneurysms.

Blood blister-like basilar apex aneurysms are rare thin-walled vascular lesions with a poorly defined aneurysmal neck. We present two patients with ruptured blister aneurysms of the basilar apex who were treated using the stent-in-stent technique. Long-term follow-up showed persistent and complete occlusion of the aneurysms without radiographically or neurological complications. There is no optimal treatment of choice for the basilar apex blood blister-like aneurysms. Double- or triple-stent placement using the stent-in-stent technique can be a safe and feasible option for these uncommon and challenging intracranial aneurysms.

Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Single-Institution Experience With a Collaborative Team.

BACKGROUND: Secondary to the complex care, involved specialty providers, and various etiologies, chronic pelvic pain patients do not receive holistic care. OBJECTIVE: To compare our general and neuromodulation cohorts based on referrals, diagnosis, and therapy and describe our neuromodulation patients. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was established at our center. The intake coordinator assessed demographics and facilitated care of enrolled patients. Outcomes were compared using minimal clinical important difference of current Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) between patients with neuropathic pain who received neuromodulation and those who did not. The neuromodulation cohort completed outcome metrics at baseline and recent follow-up, including NRS score (best, worst, and current), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. RESULTS: Over 7 yr, 233 patients were referred to our consortium and 153 were enrolled. A total of 55 patients had neuropathic pain and 44 of those were managed medically. Eleven underwent neuromodulation. A total of 45.5% patients of the neuromodulation cohort were classified as responders by minimal clinically important difference compared to 26.6% responders in the control cohort at most recent follow-up (median 25 and 33 mo, respectively). Outcome measures revealed improvement in NRS at worst (P = .007) and best (P = .025), ODI (P = .014), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale Rumination (P = .043). CONCLUSION: Eleven percent of patients were offered neuromodulation. There were more responders in the neuromodulation cohort than the conservatively managed neuropathic pain cohort. Neuromodulation patients showed significant improvement at 29 mo in NRS best and worst pain, disability, and rumination. We share our algorithm for patient management.

Effects of external low intensity focused ultrasound on electrophysiological changes in vivo in a rodent model of common peroneal nerve injury.

Non-invasive treatment methods for neuropathic pain are lacking. We assess how modulatory low intensity focused ultrasound (liFUS) at the L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) affects behavioral responses and sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) in a common peroneal nerve injury (CPNI) model. Rats were assessed for mechanical and thermal responses using Von Frey filaments (VFF) and the hot plate test (HPT) following CPNI surgery. Testing was repeated 24 h after liFUS treatment. Significant increases in mechanical and thermal sensory thresholds were seen post-liFUS treatment, indicating a reduction in sensitivity to pain (p < 0.0001, p = 0.02, respectively). Animals who received CPNI surgery had significant increases in SNAP latencies compared to sham CPNI surgery animals (p = 0.0003) before liFUS treatment. LiFUS induced significant reductions in SNAP latency in both CPNI liFUS and sham CPNI liFUS cohorts, for up to 35 min post treatment. No changes were seen in SNAP amplitude and there was no evidence of neuronal degeneration 24 h after liFUS treatment, showing that liFUS did not damage the tissue being modulated. This is the first in vivo study of the impact of liFUS on peripheral nerve electrophysiology in a model of chronic pain. This study demonstrates the effects of liFUS on peripheral nerve electrophysiology in vivo. We found that external liFUS treatment results in transient decreased latency in common peroneal nerve (CPN) sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) with no change in signal amplitude.

Use of a Psychological Evaluation Tool as a Predictor of Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative work-up for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) includes a psychological assessment; however, no one psychological factor has correlated with poor outcomes across studies. We developed a Psychological Evaluation Tool for Spinal Cord Stimulation Candidacy (PETSCSC), which includes all factors in the literature found to correlate with outcomes. In this study, we examine whether PETSCSC correlates with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing SCS were prospectively enrolled in this study. PETSCSC scores were obtained preoperatively. Numeric rating scale (NRS), global impression of change (GIC), pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Beck Depression Inventory were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. Outcomes were correlated with PETSCSC scores. RESULTS: Thirty-four SCS patients had a mean follow-up of 9.88 ± 2.91 months. At latest follow-up, we observed significant improvement in NRS, PCS, MPQ, and ODI. Total PETSCSC score exhibited significant correlation with GIC (p = 0.026, r = 0.380) and improvement in PCS total (p = 0.041, r = 0.351), and MPQ affective (p = 0.002, r = 0.517) scores. The PETSCSC emotive subset significantly correlated with GIC (p = 0.020, r = 0.395). The PETSCSC depression subset significantly correlated with improvement in PCS rumination (p = 0.009, r = 0.439), PCS helplessness (p = 0.021, r = 0.393), PCS total (p = 0.021, r = 0.394), and MPQ affective (p = 0.002, r = 0.501). The PETSCSC therapy subset significantly correlated with improvement in MPQ sensory (p = 0.026, r = -0.381) and MPQ affective (p < 0.001, r = 0.583). DISCUSSION: PETSCSC scores and subscores demonstrate significant correlation with pain outcomes used in assessment of SCS efficacy. Higher PETSCSC scores correlate with greater improvement in GIC, MPQ affective, and PCS scores. Stratification of these patients based on PETSCSC total and subset scores could help with prognostication.

Duloxetine Improves Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be effective in treating chronic pain in patients with varying etiologies. However, the impact of pharmacological treatment on augmenting response to SCS has not been previously studied. METHODS: We enrolled 108 patients who had undergone SCS surgery and documented their pain preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Global Impression of Change (GIC). Pain outcomes were compared between patients receiving SCS alone and in addition to duloxetine. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, patients receiving duloxetine and SCS (n = 41) had better pain relief in the affective component of MPQ (p < 0.05) than those receiving SCS alone (n = 71). Patients on duloxetine with SCS also were significantly more willing to receive SCS again (p < 0.01). This willingness appeared to be duloxetine dose dependent (p < 0.05). Patients receiving pregabalin or gabapentin with SCS did not have significantly more pain relief than patients receiving SCS alone. CONCLUSION: This study shows the combination therapy to be an effective strategy to provide more holistic pain relief and further improve the quality of life of SCS patients.

External focused ultrasound treatment for neuropathic pain induced by common peroneal nerve injury.

Neuropathic pain caused by nerve injury or compressive lesions is a debilitating condition lacking effective, long-term treatments. Our objective was to assess the effects of external focused ultrasound on sensory thresholds utilizing a common peroneal injury rat model. CPNI was induced by ligating the CPN of the left hind paw. Neuropathic phenotype was confirmed using the Von Frey Fibers (VFF) with a 50% mechanical detection threshold below 4.0. The Place Escape Avoidance Paradigm (PEAP) was employed as a behavioral correlate. External FUS treatment was applied to the left L4,5 DRG at 8 W for 3-min. There were two treatment groups; one received a single FUS treatment, while the other received two. Control groups consisted of one sham CPNI group that received FUS treatment and a CPNI group that received sham FUS treatment. Behavioral tests were conducted pre-CPNI surgery, 1-week post-surgery, and for 1-week post-FUS treatment(s). CPNI surgery resulted in lower VFF mechanical thresholds in the left hind paw compared to baseline (p < 0.0001) and increased proportion of time spent on bright side compared to baseline values on PEAP (p = 0.0473), indicating neuropathic state. FUS treatment increased VFF thresholds after 24-hours (p < 0.0001), 48-h (p = 0.0079), and 72-h (p = 0.0164). VFF returned to baseline values from day 4-7. Following a second FUS treatment on day 8, increased mechanical thresholds were similarly observed after 24-h (p = 0.0021), 48-h (p < 0.0001), and 72-h (p = 0.0256). Control group analysis showed (1) CPNI rats experienced no change in mechanical thresholds following sham FUS treatment and (2) Sham CPNI rats receiving FUS did not experience significantly different mechanical thresholds compared to baseline and post-CPNI values. Post-FUS histological analysis demonstrated healthy ganglion cells without chromatolysis. Our results demonstrate changes in VFF and PEAP in rats who underwent CPNI. Single and multiple doses of external FUS increase mechanical thresholds without inducing histological damage. Based on our results, we have demonstrated the potential of FUS to serve as a non-pharmacological and non-ablative neuromodulatory approach for the treatment of allodynia and neuropathic pain.