Burden of Illness in Follicular Lymphoma with Multiple Lines of Treatment, Italian RWE Analysis.

This real-world analysis investigated patients with follicular lymphoma in Italy receiving three or more treatment lines (≥3L), focusing on therapeutic pathways with their rebounds on healthcare resource consumptions and costs. Data were retrieved from administrative databases from healthcare entities covering about 13.3 million residents. Adults diagnosed with follicular lymphoma were identified between January 2015 and June 2020, and among them 2434 patients with ≥3L of treatment during the data availability interval (January 2009 to June 2021) were included. Of them, 1318 were in 3L, 494 in 4L and 622 in ≥5L. A relevant proportion of patients (12-32%) switched to a later line within the same calendar year. At 3-year follow-up (median), 34% patients died. Total mean annual expenses were euro 14,508 in the year preceding inclusion and rose to euro 21,081 at 1-year follow-up (on average euro 22,230/patient/year for the whole follow-up), with hospitalization and drug expenses as weightiest cost items. In conclusion, the clinical and economic burden of follicular lymphoma increases along with later treatment lines. The high mortality rates indicate that further efforts are needed to optimize disease management.

Real-world analysis of the economic and therapeutic burden in advanced breast cancer patients in Italy.

BACKGROUND: This real-world analysis evaluated drug utilization focusing on wastage and healthcare costs for treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC) hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) in Italy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on administrative data covering about 13.3 million health-assisted individuals. Across January/2017-June/2021, all patients with HR+/HER2-aBC were identified by ≥ 1 prescription for cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i). Cost analysis was performed and updated referring to the prices of November 2021. RESULTS: Overall, 3,647 HR+/HER2-aBC patients were included (2,627 palbociclib treated, 729 ribociclib treated, and 291 abemaciclib treated). After 12 months of follow-up, 35% of palbociclib patients had a dose reduction (on average 8.9 wasted pills/patient), 44.7% of abemaciclib patients had a dose reduction (on average 6.7 wasted pills/patient), 22.1% of ribociclib patients had a dose reduction (no wasted pills). Therapy wastage added up to 528,716€ for palbociclib-treated patients (524€/patient) and 5,738€ in abemaciclib-treated patients (151€/patient). No wastage was attributed to ribociclib. CONCLUSIONS: Dose reduction was associated with drug wastage in palbociclib and abemaciclib-treated patients, but not in ribociclib-treated ones. These findings might be helpful to policy decision-makers who, for healthcare strategies implementation, among several variables should consider the possible restraining of drug wastage.

Real-World Evaluation of the Management, Treatment Pathways and Outcome of Melanoma Patients with Target Therapies in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, an increasing trend in the incidence of melanoma has been observed in Europe. Although early diagnosis and prompt intervention with local resection often results in positive outcomes, conversely, metastatic disease is still clinically challenging with a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival of around 30%. The growing awareness of melanoma biology and of antitumor immune responses has allowed the development of novel therapies targeted at specific molecular alterations occurring at advanced stages. This real-world analysis examined patients with melanoma in Italy, focusing on treatment patterns, outcome, time to discontinuation (TTD), and resource consumption. METHODS: Two retrospective observational analyses were conducted for BRAF+ patients with metastatic melanoma and those with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in an adjuvant setting, retrieving data from the administrative databases covering 13.3 million residents. The cohort melanoma BRAF+ in metastatic setting comprised 729 patients with targeted therapy (TT) (n = 671 with TT as first line and 79 as second line). RESULTS: Median TTD was 10.6 months in first line and 8.1 months in second line. Median overall survival from the start of first TT line was 27 months and was 11.8 months for patients with brain metastasis. In the dabrafenib plus trametinib patients, main healthcare resource consumption tended to increase in the presence of brain metastasis. The cohort with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy under adjuvant therapy (n = 289) included 8% patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib or tested BRAF+, 5% BRAF wild-type, and 10% under immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our findings provided an overview on TT utilization on metastatic melanoma patients in real clinical practice and highlighted an increased burden in brain metastatic patients.

The Economic Burden of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Patients with Later Lines: Findings from a Real-World Analysis in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematopoietic myeloproliferative disorder that accounts for 20% of all leukemias of adults. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (imatinib, bosutinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib) has yielded significant benefits for patients with CML in terms of survival and quality of life. This real-world analysis evaluated the economic burden for managing patients with CML in 2nd or ≥ 3rd TKI lines in Italian settings of clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis was performed exploiting the administrative databases of a sample of entities covering around 15 million inhabitants. From 2015 to 2018, the study included adult patients with at least one prescription for TKIs, (and for some TKI with at least one hospitalization discharge diagnosis for CML, or at least one prescription for BCR-ABL examination). The index date was the first TKI prescription. Healthcare resource consumption and costs for patients with CML in 2nd and ≥ 3rd line treatment with TKIs were analyzed for drug prescriptions, hospitalizations, specialist visits, and diagnostic services. RESULTS: In total 635 patients were included, 491 in 2nd line and 144 in 3rd line with TKIs. Dasatinib was the most frequently prescribed drug in 2nd line (28.9%) and imatinib in later lines (26.4%). With progressing lines of treatment, healthcare consumption showed a trend towards increased non-TKI prescriptions per patient (8 for 2nd line and 9.7 for ≥ 3rd line). The management of patients with CML in later lines resulted in increased overall healthcare burden, with hospitalizations accounting for about half of total expenditure, whatever the treatment line and type of TKI. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis in Italian real-life clinical practice reported economic expenditure for patients with CML in 2nd or ≥ 3rd lines with TKIs, mostly burdened by hospitalizations. Such clinical complexity suggests that further efforts are needed to improve the therapeutic management of later lines of CML.

Real-World Analysis of the Therapeutic Management and Disease Burden in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Later Lines in Italy.

Real world data are becoming a crucial tool to understand how cancer is treated in routine daily practice. This real-world analysis aims to describe the characteristics of patients with CML in 2nd or ≥3rd tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) lines of therapy, to evaluate their treatment sequence and utilization in settings of Italian clinical practice in Italy. A retrospective analysis was performed using an administrative databases covering around 15.3 million cases. All adult patients prescribed with TKI as 2nd or ≥3rd lines (L) of therapy for CML during January 2015-December 2018 were included. A total of 491 patients in 2nd and 144 in ≥3rd L was included. In both cohorts, hypertension was the most reported comorbidity, followed by metabolic and blood count alterations. In each calendar inclusion year, an increment of 97.6% was observed in the number of patients treated in ≥3rd L. In the 2nd L cohort, 18.7% had a switch to 3rd L, while 26.4% of ≥3rd L patients switched to a subsequent line. Around 40% in both lines discontinued their treatment after a median time of 5.5 (2nd L) and 4.3 (≥3rd L) years. The results provided insights into CML management clinical practice, indicating a heavy disease burden for patients in later lines that showed an increasing complex management, and suggest that a need for novel treatment strategies might exists.

Real-World Evidence on Disease Burden and Economic Impact of Sickle Cell Disease in Italy.

A real-world analysis was conducted in Italy among sickle cell disease (SCD) patients to evaluate the epidemiology of SCD, describe patients' characteristics and the therapeutic and economic burden. A retrospective analysis of administrative databases of various Italian entities was carried out. All patients with ≥1 hospitalization with SCD diagnosis were included from 01/2010-12/2017 (up to 12/2018 for epidemiologic analysis). The index date corresponded to the first SCD diagnosis. In 2018, SCD incidence rate was 0.93/100,000, the prevalence was estimated at 13.1/100,000. Overall, 1816 patients were included. During the 1st year of follow-up, 50.7% of patients had one all-cause hospitalization, 27.8% had 2, 10.4% had 3, and 11.1% had ≥4. Over follow-up, 6.1-7.2% of patients were treated with SCD-specific, 58.4-69.4% with SCD-related, 60.7-71.3% with SCD-complications-related drugs. Mean annual number per patient of overall treatments was 14.9 ± 13.9, hospitalizations 1.1 ± 1.1, and out-patient services 5.3 ± 7.6. The total mean direct cost per patient was EUR 7918/year (EUR 2201 drugs, EUR 3320 hospitalizations, and EUR 2397 out-patient services). The results from this real-world analysis showed a high disease burden for SCD patients with multiple hospitalizations during the follow-up. High healthcare resource utilization and costs were associated with patient' management and were most likely underestimated since indirect costs and Emergency Room admissions were not included.

An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Italy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) from an Italian National Health Service perspective, considering the evolving Italian landscape in terms of new reimbursement agreements trend. METHODS: This analysis is an update of the previously published cost-effectiveness analysis to incorporate recent 2019 costs and additional changes regarding drug discounting. A partitioned-survival analysis model with three different health states (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and dead) was utilized. Outcomes included progression-free life years, post-progression life years, overall life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs calculated for both treatments. Cost-effectiveness was assessed in terms of incremental costs per QALY gained and the net monetary benefit (NMB) of pazopanib versus sunitinib. In the base case analysis, a time horizon of 5 years was used and future costs and QALYs were discounted at a 3% annual discount rate. An impact of methodological and parameter uncertainly on base case results was evaluated using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In the base case, pazopanib had higher QALYs (+0.060) at lower costs (-€5,857) versus sunitinib, hence it dominated sunitinib. At willingness-to-pay thresholds of €30,000 and €50,000 per QALY, the NMB with pazopanib were €7,647 and €8,841 per patient, respectively, versus sunitinib. The probability that pazopanib is cost-effective versus sunitinib was estimated to be 97.5% at a cost-effectiveness threshold of €20,000, 95.4% at a threshold of €30,000, and 90.2% at a threshold of €50,000 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness results were robust to changes in key parameter values and assumptions as demonstrated by deterministic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Pazopanib is likely to represent a cost-effective treatment option compared with sunitinib as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic RCC in Italy.