Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Vaccine ; 38(18): 3411-3421, 2020 04 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32192811

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To optimize vaccine implementation visits for young children, it could be efficient to administer the first RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine dose during the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) visit at 6 months of age together with Vitamin A supplementation and the third RTS,S/AS01 dose on the same day as yellow fever (YF), measles and rubella vaccines at 9 months of age. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of RTS,S/AS01 when co-administered with YF and combined measles-rubella (MR) vaccines. METHODS: In this phase 3b, open-label, controlled study (NCT02699099), 709 Ghanaian children were randomized (1:1:1) to receive RTS,S/AS01 at 6, 7.5 and 9 months of age, and YF and MR vaccines at 9 or 10.5 months of age (RTS,S coad and RTS,S alone groups, respectively). The third group received YF and MR vaccines at 9 months of age and will receive RTS,S/AS01 at 10.5, 11.5 and 12.5 months of age (Control group). All children received Vitamin A at 6 months of age. Non-inferiority of immune responses to the vaccine antigens was evaluated 1 month following co-administration versus RTS,S/AS01 or EPI vaccines (YF and MR vaccines) alone using pre-defined non-inferiority criteria. Safety was assessed until Study month 4.5. RESULTS: Non-inferiority of antibody responses to the anti-circumsporozoite and anti-hepatitis B virus surface antigens when RTS,S/AS01 was co-administered with YF and MR vaccines versus RTS,S/AS01 alone was demonstrated. Non-inferiority of antibody responses to the measles, rubella, and YF antigens when RTS,S/AS01 was co-administered with YF and MR vaccines versus YF and MR vaccines alone was demonstrated. The safety profile of all vaccines was clinically acceptable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: RTS,S/AS01 can be co-administered with Vitamin A at 6 months and with YF and MR vaccines at 9 months of age during EPI visits, without immune response impairment to any vaccine antigen or negative safety effect.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Malaria , Sarampión , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla , Niño , Preescolar , Ghana , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Malaria/efectos adversos , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/efectos adversos
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 16(6): 1464-1470, 2020 06 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31951771

RESUMEN

RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine contains the hepatitis B virus surface antigen and may thus serve as a potential hepatitis B vaccine. To evaluate the impact of RTS,S/AS01E when implemented in the Expanded Program of Immunization, infants 8-12 weeks old were randomized to receive either RTS,S/AS01E or a licensed hepatitis B control vaccine (HepB), both co-administered with various combinations of the following childhood vaccines: diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b, trivalent oral poliovirus, pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate and human rotavirus vaccine. Long-term persistence of antibodies against the circumsporozoite (CS) protein and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were assessed, together with the immune memory response to the HB antigen following a booster dose of HepB vaccine. Subgroups receiving RTS,S or the HepB control vaccine were pooled into RTS,S groups and HepB groups, respectively. One month post-HepB booster vaccination, 100% of participants in the RTS,S groups and 98.3% in the control groups had anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/mL with the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) at 46634.7 mIU/mL (95% CI: 40561.3; 53617.6) and 9258.2 mIU/mL (95% CI: 6925.3; 12377.0), respectively. Forty-eight months post-primary vaccination anti-CS antibody GMCs ranged from 2.3 EU/mL to 2.7 EU/mL in the RTS,S groups compared to 1.1 EU/mL in the control groups. Hepatitis B priming with the RTS,S/AS01E vaccine was effective and resulted in a memory response to HBsAg as shown by the robust booster response following an additional dose of HepB vaccine. RTS,S/AS01E when co-administered with PHiD-CV, HRV and other childhood vaccines, had an acceptable safety profile.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Vacunas contra Haemophilus , Hepatitis B , Vacunas contra la Malaria , Niño , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Memoria Inmunológica , Lactante , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados , Vacunas Combinadas
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 14(6): 1489-1500, 2018 06 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630438

RESUMEN

The RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine (Mosquirix) reduces the incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and is intended for routine administration to infants in Sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV; Synflorix) and human rotavirus vaccine (HRV; Rotarix) when co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01345240) in African infants. 705 healthy infants aged 8-12 weeks were randomized to receive three doses of either RTS,S/AS01 or licensed hepatitis B (HBV; Engerix B) vaccine (control) co-administered with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type-b-conjugate vaccine (DTaP/Hib) and trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine at 8-12-16 weeks of age, because DTaP/Hib was not indicated before 8 weeks of age. The vaccination schedule can still be considered broadly applicable because it was within the age range recommended for EPI vaccination. PHiD-CV or HRV were either administered together with the study vaccines, or after a 2-week interval. Booster doses of PHiD-CV and DTaP/Hib were administered at age 18 months. Non-inferiority of anti-HBV surface antigen antibody seroprotection rates following co-administration with RTS,S/AS01 was demonstrated compared to the control group (primary objective). Pre-specified non-inferiority criteria were reached for PHiD-CV (for 9/10 vaccine serotypes), HRV, and aP antigens co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 as compared to HBV co-administration (secondary objectives). RTS,S/AS01 induced a response to circumsporozoite protein in all groups. Pain and low grade fever were reported more frequently in the PHiD-CV group co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 than PHiD-CV co-administered with HBV. No serious adverse events were considered to be vaccine-related. RTS,S/AS01 co-administered with pediatric vaccines had an acceptable safety profile. Immune responses to RTS,S/AS01 and to co-administered PHiD-CV, pertussis antigens and HRV were satisfactory.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Vacunas contra la Malaria/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , África del Sur del Sahara , Femenino , Fiebre/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Malaria/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Malaria/inmunología , Masculino , Dolor/epidemiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...