Epidemiology of burns in a humanitarian setting: A national study among refugees in Lebanon.

INTRODUCTION: Burns represent one of the leading causes of morbidity worldwide and disproportionately impact women, children, and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals. Syrian refugees who fled conflict to land in overcrowded informal settlements across Lebanon are a particularly vulnerable population. This study aims to assess the etiology and risk factors for burns in this population. METHODS: This cross-sectional, cluster-based population study adopted the Surgeons Overseas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) version 3.0 to capture data from refugees residing in informal settlements in multiple regions across Lebanon. The tool was contextualized and used to collect detailed information on burn cases sustained by refugees during the last 12 months prior to data collection. Univariate logistic regression models were performed to assess the relationship between burns and associated risk factors. RESULTS: From the 1468 households surveyed, a total of 223 households experienced a burn in the last 12 months. Over 63% of burns occurred in children under the age of ten years and almost 57% of burns occurred in females. More than 70% of burns resulted from hot liquid, while 17% were caused by direct heat contact. Over 3/4ths of burns occurred while preparing food (77.4%). Approximately 32% of those burned did not seek healthcare, of which almost 85% noted the cause was mainly due to financial limitations. CONCLUSION: Burns are a common injury in the Syrian refugee population living in Lebanon. Children and women are particularly impacted, often during cooking. Multi-level interventions are necessary to reduce burn injuries and improve care for those affected by burns. Community kitchens can be used to separate cooking and living environments and get stoves and hot liquids off the floor. Importantly, policies should allow for refugees to receive medical care when necessary without a major financial burden.

Shifting Away From Fee-For-Service: Alternative Approaches to Payment in Gastroenterology.

Fee-for-service payments encourage high-volume services rather than high-quality care. Alternative payment models (APMs) aim to realign financing to support high-value services. The 2 main components of gastroenterologic care, procedures and chronic care management, call for a range of APMs. The first step for gastroenterologists is to identify the most important conditions and opportunities to improve care and reduce waste that do not require financial support. We describe examples of delivery reforms and emerging APMs to accomplish these care improvements. A bundled payment for an episode of care, in which a provider is given a lump sum payment to cover the cost of services provided during the defined episode, can support better care for a discrete procedure such as a colonoscopy. Improved management of chronic conditions can be supported through a per-member, per-month (PMPM) payment to offer extended services and care coordination. For complex chronic conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, in which the gastroenterologist is the principal care coordinator, the PMPM payment could be given to a gastroenterology medical home. For conditions in which the gastroenterologist acts primarily as a consultant for primary care, such as noncomplex gastroesophageal reflux or hepatitis C, a PMPM payment can support effective care coordination in a medical neighborhood delivery model. Each APM can be supplemented with a shared savings component. Gastroenterologists must engage with and be early leaders of these redesign discussions to be prepared for a time when APMs may be more prevalent and no longer voluntary.

The effects of storage time and temperature on recovery of salivary secretory immunoglobulin A.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the optimal storage temperature to minimise degradation of salivary s-IgA for field-based surveillance applications in resource-limited settings. METHODS: Saliva samples from 40 Zambian adults were stored at +25°C, +4°C, -20°C, and -80°C and each tested by ELISA for salivary s-IgA concentration at 0, 1, 2, 7, and 15 days. Differences were determined among concentrations over time and temperature compared with baseline values. Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to analyse variance. Single and multivariate regression analyses estimated the influence of storage time and temperature on recoverable s-IgA. RESULTS: Results revealed a statistically significant decrease in salivary s-IgA concentration as storage time increased and as temperature decreased. Degradation during storage time was most pronounced at lower temperatures. CONCLUSIONS: s-IgA is stable at ambient temperatures in Zambia for at least 15 days, suggesting no need for cold chain handling before analysis in field-based surveillance applications.