Factors associated with early readmission for postpartum hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are increasing in prevalence and a leading cause of early postpartum readmissions. Stricter blood pressure target goals for treatment of hypertension during pregnancy have recently been proposed, however, the treatment goals for management of postpartum hypertension are less well established. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical factors associated with early postpartum readmissions for hypertensive disease and to evaluate blood pressure thresholds associated with these readmissions. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women delivering at a tertiary care center between January 2018 and May 2022 who experienced a hospital readmission for postpartum hypertension or new onset postpartum preeclampsia. Charts were reviewed for clinical and sociodemographic data. Patients with early readmission (<72 hours after discharge) were compared with patients readmitted after 3 days of initial discharge. Data were analyzed using chi-square, Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression where appropriate. The P value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: During the study period, 23,372 deliveries occurred. Postpartum readmission due to worsening of a known diagnosis of hypertension or new onset postpartum preeclampsia occurred in 1.1% and 0.49% respectively. Patients with early readmission were more likely to have hypertensive disorders of pregnancy as the indication for delivery. Among patients readmitted, 93% had 2 or more systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, and 73% had blood pressure of either systolic between 130 and 139 mmHg or diastolic between 80 and 89 mmHg within 24 hours before initial discharge. Only 27 patients met criteria (blood pressure ≥160/110 mmHg on >1 vitals check during their hospitalization) to be started on antihypertensives before initial delivery discharge; of those 25 (93%) were discharged with a new prescription for an antihypertensive. After controlling for confounding variables, predischarge blood pressure between 130-140 mmHg/80-90 mmHg (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4 [1.5-4.0]) was associated with an increased likelihood of early readmission. CONCLUSION: Patients with delivery for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and predischarge blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg were less likely to have an early readmission within 3 days of initial discharge, however, patients with predischarge blood pressure 130-139 mmHg/80-89 mmHg were more likely to have an early readmission for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and postpartum preeclampsia. Further research is indicated to evaluate interventions to prevent postpartum readmission in patients at high risk for persistent hypertension or new onset postpartum preeclampsia.

Risk of birth defects in pregnant persons with sleep-disordered breathing during pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: As many as one in four pregnant women may experience sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during pregnancy. The same sequelae of SDB, such as insulin resistance and inflammation, have been implicated in the development of certain birth defects. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the SDB substudy of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be study, which included 2106 participants who had a sufficiency sleep study at two visits at different time points in pregnancy. SDB was based on a self-administered home sleep apnea test with data scored by trained, blinded research polysomnologists. SDB was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5. The primary outcome of this analysis was any of the 45 non-chromosomal birth defects included in the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Annual Report. RESULTS: In this cohort, the overall rate of birth defects was 3.1%. The prevalence was similar between those without SDB (3.0%) and those with only mid-pregnancy SDB (3.4%), but was higher in those with early-pregnancy SDB (6.7%). After adjusting for maternal age, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and body mass index (BMI), there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of birth defects by subject SDB status. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies to evaluate the effect of prepregnancy and early-pregnancy SDB on the fetus, as well as the risk of specific birth defects and neonatal outcomes in those with an objectively measured diagnosis of SDB, are still needed.

Management of Hepatitis B and C during Pregnancy: Neonatal Implications.

Over the last several decades, we have seen increased rates of infants born to persons with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Due to this, many obstetric and pediatric organizations have updated their guidelines about screening and management of HBV and HCV during pregnancy, as well as the management of the exposed infant. Current guidelines suggest that all pregnant individuals should be screened for both HBV and HCV during each pregnancy. Appropriate medical care of pregnant persons and the newborn can significantly reduce the risk of vertical transmission.

A novel clinic structure for exposure counseling during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Congenital malformations and adverse fetal outcomes secondary to teratogenic exposures are major public health concerns. We review all inquiries made to the Florida MotherToBaby service center as well as the novel Exposure Clinic, which offers direct patient counseling. METHODS: We completed a retrospective review of all inquiries made to the MotherToBaby Florida service and the Exposure Clinic consults between its inception January 2019 through December 2021. All de-identified data was collected at the time of the inquiry and stored in the OTIS database. Aggregate data was then extracted and descriptive statistics were performed. A p value of less than .05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: In 2019, there were 163 total inquiries, 265 in 2020, and 1,279 in 2021. These 1,707 inquiries covered 2,809 unique exposures. In the Exposure Clinic, 49 patients were seen in 2019, 140 in 2020, and 263 in 2021. The clinic's geographical reach increased over time with patients from 22 different counties being seen in 2021. Of all individual exposures, 45% were evaluated in 452 unique encounters in the Exposure Clinic and 55% were evaluated in 1255 unique encounters via traditional modes of contact. The average number of exposures discussed at each clinic appointment 2.8 versus 1.2 in inquiries via traditional methods. The majority of all exposures were regarding prescription medications, specifically psychiatric medications, followed by immunizations. The exposure with the single most inquiries was the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: This novel clinic structure allows for complex counseling and clinical recommendations regarding exposures during pregnancy.

Impact of Using Abdominal Circumference Independently in the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction.

OBJECTIVE: Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine guidelines for diagnosing fetal growth restriction (FGR) have broadened the definition to include abdominal circumference (AC) <10th percentile for gestational age (GA) regardless of estimated fetal weight (EFW). We aimed to compare the ability of three definitions of FGR to predict small for gestational age (SGA) neonates and adverse outcomes. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of patients who underwent assessment of fetal growth between GA of 26 and 36 weeks. We compared three definitions of FGR: EFW <10th percentile; AC <10th percentile; either EFW or AC <10th percentile. The primary outcome was successful prediction of neonatal SGA. Secondary outcomes included a composite adverse neonatal outcome (CANO). We further compared these definitions of FGR using area under receiver operative curves (AUC) to measure their discriminatory abilities. RESULTS: About 1054 women met inclusion criteria. Ninety-one (8.6%) had EFW <10th percentile, 122 (11.6%) had AC <10th percentile, and 137 (12.9%) had either EFW or AC <10th percentile. SGA was seen in 139 (13.2%); CANO was seen in 139 (13.2%). Ability for detecting neonatal SGA was significantly better when the definition included both EFW or AC <10th percentile compared to either variable independently. The AUC were: 0.74, 0.73, 0.69; P = .0003. There was no statistical significance in ability for predicting CANO (AUC 0.51, 0.51, 0.50; P = .7447). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of AC as a criterion for diagnosing FGR improves our ability to predict neonatal SGA compared to using EFW alone. All three definitions were poorly predictive of neonates at risk for adverse outcomes.