NT-pro-BNP is predictive of morbidity and mortality after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy and is independent of preoperative hemodynamics.

Current predictors of clinical outcomes after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are largely limited to preoperative clinical characteristics. N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), a biomarker of right ventricular dysfunction, has not yet been well described as one such predictor. From 2017 to 2021, 816 patients with CTEPH referred to the University of California, San Diego for PTE were reviewed for differences in NT-pro-BNP to predict preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes up to 30 days post-PTE. For analysis, NT-pro-BNP was dichotomized to less than/equal to or greater than 1000 pg/mL based on the mean of the study population. Mean NT-pro-BNP was 1095.9 ±1783.4 pg/mL and median was 402.5 pg/mL (interquartile range: 119.5-1410.8). Of the 816 patients included, 250 had NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL. Those with NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL were significantly more likely to have worse preoperative functional class (III-IV) and worse preoperative hemodynamics. Patients with NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL also tended to have more postoperative complications including reperfusion pulmonary edema (22% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001), airway hemorrhage (8.4% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.075), residual pulmonary hypertension (11.9% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001), and 30-day mortality (4.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.001). Even after adjusting for confounders, patients with NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL had a 2.48 times higher odds (95% confidence interval: 1.45-4.00) of reaching a combined endpoint that included the above complications. Preoperative NT-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL is a strong predictor of more severe preoperative hemodynamics and identifies patients at higher risk for postoperative complications.

Repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy outcomes: A 15-year single-center retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is potentially curable via pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. A minority of patients experience recurrence of their symptoms and are eligible for repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. However, little data exist regarding risk factors and outcomes for this patient population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the University of California San Diego chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension quality improvement database, including all patients who underwent pulmonary thromboendarterectomy from December 2005 to December 2020. Of the 2019 cases performed during this period, 46 were repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy procedures. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, and surgical complications were compared between the repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy group and 1008 first pulmonary thromboendarterectomy group. RESULTS: Repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy recipients were more likely to be younger, to have an identified hypercoagulable state, and to have higher preoperative right atrial pressure. Etiologies of recurrent disease include incomplete initial endarterectomy, discontinuation of anticoagulation (noncompliance or for medical reasons), and anticoagulation treatment failure. Patients who received repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy had significant hemodynamic improvement, but less pronounced compared with patients who received first pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy was associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding, reperfusion lung injury, residual pulmonary hypertension, and increased ventilator, intensive care unit, and hospital days. However, hospital mortality was similar between the groups (2.2% vs 1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported series of repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy surgery. Despite an increase in postoperative complications, this study demonstrates that repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy surgery can result in significant hemodynamic improvement with acceptable surgical mortality in an experienced center.

Distal vessel pulmonary thromboendarterectomy: Results from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is primarily managed by pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). As advanced surgical techniques permit resection at the segmental and subsegmental level, PTE can now be curative for CTEPH mostly involving the distal pulmonary arteries. METHODS: Between January 2017 and June 2021, consecutive patients undergoing PTE were categorized according to the most proximal level of chronic thrombus resection: Level I (main pulmonary artery), Level II (lobar), Level III (segmental) and Level IV (subsegmental). Proximal disease patients (any Level I or II) were compared to distal disease (Level III or IV bilaterally) patients. Demographics, medical history, preoperative pulmonary hemodynamics, and immediate postoperative outcomes were obtained for each group. RESULTS: During the study period, 794 patients underwent PTE, 563 with proximal disease and 231 with distal disease. Patients with distal disease more frequently had a history of an indwelling intravenous device, splenectomy, upper extremity thrombosis or use thyroid replacement and less often had prior lower extremity thrombosis or hypercoagulable state. Despite more use of PAH-targeted medications in the distal disease group (63.2% vs 50.1%, p < 0.001), preoperative hemodynamics were similar. Both patient groups exhibited significant improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics postoperatively with comparable in-hospital mortality rates. Compared to proximal disease, a lower percentage of patients with distal disease showed residual pulmonary hypertension (3.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.039) and airway hemorrhage (3.0% vs 6.6%, p = 0.047) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboendarterectomy for distal (segmental and subsegmental) CTEPH is technically feasible and may result in favorable pulmonary hemodynamic outcomes, without increased mortality or morbidity.

Airway Hemorrhage Complicating Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy: Risk Factors and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Airway hemorrhage is a known complication of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Predisposing factors for postoperative airway hemorrhage have not been well described. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and outcomes of airway hemorrhage after PTE and to identify potential risk factors. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of subjects undergoing PTE between 2015 and 2019. Postoperative airway hemorrhage was defined as significant endobronchial bleeding requiring withholding anticoagulation, bronchial blocker placement, and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). RESULTS: Of 877 subjects who underwent PTE, 58 subjects (6.6%) developed postoperative airway hemorrhage. Subjects with hemorrhage were more likely to be women (60% vs 45%, P = .03), to be older (57.8 vs 54.0 years, P = .04), and to have a higher incidence of preoperative hemoptysis (19.0% vs 7.6%, P = .006) compared with control subjects (subjects without airway hemorrhage). Those with hemorrhage had significantly higher preoperative right atrial pressure (P = .002) and pulmonary vascular resistance (P < .001) and a higher incidence of residual pulmonary hypertension (P = .005). Airway hemorrhage management included ECMO with bronchial blocker (n = 2), bronchial blocker without ECMO (n = 26), or withholding anticoagulation alone until bleeding subsided (n = 30). Mortality was significantly higher in those with airway hemorrhage compared with control subjects (13.8% vs 1.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative airway hemorrhage is low but associated with significant mortality. Older age, female sex, preoperative hemoptysis, and worse preoperative pulmonary hypertension were associated with an increased risk of developing postoperative airway hemorrhage.

Improved Time in Therapeutic Range with International Normalized Ratio Remote Monitoring for Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Despite advances in therapy, bleeding and thromboembolic events are frequent complications in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Maintaining warfarin in therapeutic range has been shown to be more challenging in this patient population compared to other indications. Patients with LVADs on warfarin typically are within goal international normalized ratio (INR) range 36-57% of the time, compared to about 65% for other indications. The goal of this study was to evaluate if an INR remote monitoring system along with the implementation of a standardized warfarin management protocol improves warfarin time in therapeutic range (TTR) for patients with LVADs. This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 78 patients with LVADs that were followed at our academic center from January 2015 to October 2017. In October 2016, we updated our warfarin management protocol and implemented a remote monitoring system with patients' weekly INR results monitored. The primary objective of the study was to determine the difference between TTRs in remote monitoring versus standard monitoring. We found that the average TTR was significantly higher in the remote monitoring group compared to the standard monitoring cohort (61.1% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.005). However, bleeding, thrombotic incidence, and hospital readmission rates were similar between the two patient cohorts. Remote monitoring improved warfarin TTR significantly in this study and may have the potential to improve anticoagulation-related outcomes in patients with LVADs.

Atrial arrhythmias after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atrial arrhythmias (AAs) are common after cardiac surgeries including pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). This study was done to identify patients at highest risk of developing post-PTE AA and their length of stay (LOS). METHODS: We reviewed 521 consecutive patients referred to University of California San Diego (UCSD) for PTE and examined their demographics as well as their baseline pulmonary hemodynamics to determine risk factors for AA. RESULTS: Overall, 24.2% of patients developed an AA after PTE. Patients who developed AA had a significantly longer Intensive Care Unit (ICU) LOS (median: 5 vs 3 days, P < 0.001) and postoperative LOS (median: 14 vs 9 days; P < 0.001). Patients who developed AA were more frequently male (63.2% male, P = 0.003), older (mean age 60.8 vs 50.7 years, P < 0.001), had a prior history of atrial fibrillation (80.2% of those who developed AA) and were more likely to have undergone concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (12.7% vs 6.6%, P = 0.028). Compared to those who did not develop AA, the cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer among those who developed AA (261.6 vs 253.8 minutes, P = 0.027). In a multivariate logistic regression model, the preoperative variables that predicted AA were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.058 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.038-1.078), male sex (OR, 1.68, 95% CI: 1.06-2.64), prior AA (OR, 2.52, 95% CI: 1.23-5.15) and baseline right atrial pressure (OR, 1.039 per mm Hg, 95% CI: 1.000-1.079). While mortality rates were similar, patients who developed AA had more bleeding complications and more postoperative delirium. CONCLUSIONS: AA is common after PTE surgery. The strongest risk factors for AA after PTE included the previous history of AA, age and male sex. Development of AA was associated with longer lengths of stay and more postoperative complications.

Outcomes of repeated transvenous lead extraction.

INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of repeated cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction have not been well studied. We sought to determine the indications, outcomes, and safety of repeated lead extraction procedures. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using data from two medical centers, including 38 patients who had undergone two or more lead extraction procedures compared to 439 patients who had a single procedure. The electronic medical records and procedural databases were reviewed to determine the indications, procedural characteristics, and outcomes. The outcomes of the first procedure were compared to the outcomes of subsequent procedures. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative probability of a repeated extraction procedure was 11% (95% confidence interval, 7%-15%). In 439 patients who underwent single lead extractions, 72% had device and lead related infections as the procedure indication compared to 39% for 38 patients who underwent repeated extraction (P < 0.001). The mean duration from device reimplant to repeated extraction procedures was 63 ± 48 months. Ninety-eight percent of the leads were removed completely in repeated procedures, similar to the 95% success rate of the first procedure (P = 0.51). There was no significant difference in major complication rate in the first or repeated extractions (2.6% vs 5.2%, P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated transvenous lead extraction is not uncommon. It had a high success rate comparable to that of the initial procedure and was not associated with an increased incidence of adverse events.

Management of Arrhythmias and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

For patients with end-stage heart failure, the use of mechanical circulatory support has increased in the last decade due to improved outcomes with durable left ventricular assist devices. The management of these complex patients requires coordinated care by a multidisciplinary team including cardiac electrophysiologists because atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are prevalent in this population. There have been an increasing number of studies that attempt to address issues regarding arrhythmia management in patients with left ventricular assist devices. The purpose of this review is to provide electrophysiologists with an evidence-based approach to manage a broad spectrum of arrhythmia issues in these patients.

Durable Biventricular Support Using Right Atrial Placement of the HeartWare HVAD.

Patients with Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) levels 1-2 who either have or are at risk for right ventricular failure face significant morbidity and mortality after continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. Currently, the options for biventricular support are limited the Total Artificial Heart (TAH; CardioWest, Syncardia, Tuscon, AZ) or biventricular assist device (BiVAD), which uses bulky extracorporeal or implantable displacement pumps. We describe a successful series based on an innovative approach for biventricular support in consecutive INTERMACS levels 1-2 patients utilizing a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD; HeartWare, Framingham, MA) in a left ventricular (LV-HVAD) and a right atrial (RA-HVAD) configuration. From June 2014 through May 2016, 11 consecutive INTERMACS levels 1-2 patients with evidence of biventricular failure underwent implantation of a CF LVAD (10 LV-HVAD and 1 HeartMate II LVAD, Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) and RA-HVAD pumps. A total of 4,314 BiVAD support days were accumulated in our case series. Seven patients have undergone orthotopic heart transplant, whereas 3 are ambulatory and are either waiting transplant or reconsideration for transplantation. There is one mortality in this case series, which was due to an intracranial bleed from supratherapeutic anticoagulation. Two other patients experienced hemorrhagic strokes, but without neurologic sequelae, whereas no patients have experienced ischemic strokes. There were two episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding. This is the largest series to date involving this approach with outcomes superior to those previously described in patients receiving biventricular support. We conclude this novel therapy is a viable alternative to current practices in the management of biventricular failure.

Outcomes of lead extraction without subsequent device reimplantation.

AIMS: Outcomes among patients who do not receive device reimplantation after cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) extraction have not been well studied. The present study aims to investigate the outcomes of patients without device reimplantation after lead extraction and device removal. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively searched for consecutive patients who underwent CIED extraction at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and University of California San Diego Medical Center from 2001 through 2012. Among the patients identified, we compared characteristics of those who did and did not have device reimplantation. The Kaplan-Meier survival was analysed. Among 678 patients, 97 patients had their device extracted without reimplantation during 1-year follow-up ('no-reimplant group'). Median age was younger in the no-reimplant group (60.7 vs. 70.6 years; P < 0.001). The reasons for no reimplantation were as follows: no longer meeting criteria for CIED (48%), inappropriate device indication at initial implantation (23%), patient preference (17%), and unresolved device complications (12%). Three major arrhythmias were reported in the no-reimplant group. Overall survival in the no-reimplant group was significantly lower than in the reimplant group (60 vs. 93%; P < 0.001). Ongoing device-related complications [hazard ratio (HR), 3.91; 95% CI, 1.74-8.81; P = 0.001], infection (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.24-7.52; P = 0.02), and concurrent dialysis (HR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.12-6.71; P = 0.03) were associated with increased mortality. Of 31 deaths in the no-reimplant group, 1 was secondary to cardiac arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Fourteen per cent of patients who had device extraction did not undergo reimplantation mainly because they no longer met CIED indications. The high mortality in these patients is related to device complications and comorbid conditions, whereas mortality associated with arrhythmia is rare.

Compatibility of Radiofrequency Surgical Sponge Detection Technology with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Temporary Pacemakers.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) technology has improved detection of retained surgical sponges with a reported 100% sensitivity and specificity. However, the potential for interactions of the RF signals emitted by the detection system with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) or temporary pacemakers may limit its use in those patients with these devices. This study investigated whether RF detection technology causes interference or clinically significant changes in the programmed settings of implanted pacemakers and defibrillators or temporary epicardial pacemakers. METHODS: Fifty patients who were scheduled either for CIED removal or placement of a temporary epicardial pacemaker (at the time of open heart surgery) were recruited for this study. Device settings and measurements from separate interrogations before and after scanning with the RF detection system were compared. For the temporary pacemakers, we observed for any changes in hemodynamics or signs of pacing interference. RESULTS: Twenty (40%) pacemakers, 20 (40%) implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and 10 (20%) temporary pacemakers were analyzed in this study. During scanning, no signal interference was detected in any permanent device, and there were no significant changes in programmed settings after scanning with the RF detection system. However, pacing inhibition was detected with temporary pacing systems when programmed to a synchronous mode (DDD). CONCLUSIONS: RF detection technology can be safely used to scan for retained surgical sponges in patients with permanent CIEDs and temporary pacemakers set to asynchronous mode.

Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization with Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can be achieved via a transvenous or epicardial route. A surgically implanted epicardial LV (eLV) lead is used after a standard transvenous LV (tLV) lead implantation has failed. However, studies of clinical outcomes in patients with eLV leads and comparisons of outcome between tLV and eLV-CRT are sparse. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare clinical response between tLV-CRT and eLV-CRT, as well as to understand the differences within the eLV-CRT population. METHODS: Forty-four patients received eLV-CRT following unsuccessful attempts of tLV-CRT implantation between 2002 and 2013 at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and Mayo Clinics. These patients were matched for age, gender, and etiology of cardiomyopathy in a 1:2 ratio with a cohort of patients who received tLV-CRT during the same time period. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 57 months, similar clinical outcomes and survival rate were noted between tLV and eLV-CRT patients (all P > 0.05). Within the eLV-CRT group, dilated cardiomyopathy patients had significant improvement in New York Heart Association class and ejection fraction (both P < 0.05), while ischemic cardiomyopathy patients did not (both P > 0.05). eLV-CRT patients with nonanterior lead location had significantly improved survival (P < 0.001). There was also a trend for improved survival in those with nonapical lead location (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: In this case-matched two-centered study, comparable improvements were noted in patients with tLV-CRT and eLV-CRT. Operators should target nonanterior and nonapical locations during eLV-CRT implantation. Use of eLV-CRT should be considered a viable alternative for CRT candidates.

Percutaneous extraction of inadvertently placed left-sided pacemaker leads with complete cerebral embolic protection.

Lead wire malposition is a known, but rare complication of permanent pacemaker or defibrillator implantation. The actual incidence and prevalence is unknown and management options for inadvertent left ventricular lead malposition have not been uniform. Current recommendations include systemic anticoagulation with warfarin or surgical lead removal with circulatory arrest for compelling clinical scenarios. Percutaneous left-sided lead extraction is contraindicated due to the potentially increased risk of thromboembolic complications associated with this procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first report of percutaneous extraction of inadvertently placed left ventricular and left atrial endocardial pacemaker leads with flow-preserving complete cerebral embolic protection. We also review the current literature regarding the incidence, management, and percutaneous extraction of left-sided cardiac leads.

Baseline body mass index does not significantly affect outcomes after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a common comorbidity of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension referred for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, yet the effect of obesity on pulmonary thromboendarterectomy outcomes has not been well described. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in which 476 consecutive operations over a 3.5-year period were examined to determine the effects of obesity on outcomes. Patients were grouped into four categories based on body mass index (BMI): less than 22 kg/m2, 22 to 30 kg/m2, 30 to 40 kg/m2, and more than 40 kg/m2. RESULTS: There were important differences in baseline pulmonary hemodynamics, with obese patients having significantly lower pulmonary vascular resistances than nonobese patients. All patients achieved a significant reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance, although the improvement was greatest in the lower BMI groups. The overall in-hospital mortality was 0.8%, and there were no differences in risk among BMI groups. Among the BMI groups, there were no differences in incidence of postoperative complications, including atrial fibrillation (overall 24.8%), reperfusion lung injury (overall 23.1%), and surgical site infection (overall 4.4%) or in median lengths of stay (including ventilator days, intensive care unit days, and postoperative length of stay). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy outcomes have continued to improve, and this surgery can safely be completed in obese patients, previously deemed to be at high risk for poor outcomes.

Lead extractions: indications, procedural aspects, and outcomes.

As a result of more cardiac implantable electronic devices being placed, a trend toward increasing device infections, and concerns regarding lead malfunction, there is an increased need for lead extraction skills and comprehensive lead management programs. This review discusses the current indications for lead extractions as well as the training requirements and tools and technology needed to create the foundation for a successful lead management program.