The current management of scaphoid fractures in the emergency department across an Australian metropolitan public health service: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Scaphoid fractures are commonly present to emergency departments (EDs), challenging medical practitioners to achieve accurate diagnosis and management. This is because of the prevalence of radiographically occult scaphoid fractures and complications associated with missed diagnoses. Clinical Guidelines are limited for treatment of suspected scaphoid fractures, and heterogeneity in the literature further complicates management. This study aimed to explore the differences in management between practitioners in the ED and determine if immobilizing clinically suspected scaphoid fractures is supported by current evidence. This study also aimed to establish if there are predictors to assist in the diagnosis of a scaphoid fracture in the ED. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from patient's charts who attended the ED for a scaphoid fracture in 2019. Using retrospective patient chart audits and a Data Extraction Form, the clinical data regarding the assessment, treatment, diagnosis, and follow-up outcomes were collected. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to assess current management and find out predictors of a scaphoid fracture. RESULTS: There was significance between practitioners performing physical assessments and providing treatment (P < .001). Physiotherapists performed assessment and education combined treatment more frequently than nurse practitioners and doctors. Thirty-four cases (11.7%) were negative for fracture in ED and positive in follow-up at the orthopedic clinic. There was an estimated loss of income of $327,433.60 (Australian dollar) for 221 patients who missed work due to overtreatment with immobilization. The strongest predictors for a confirmed scaphoid fracture were of male gender (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.0; P < .001) and a positive x-ray in ED (odds ratio, 36.6; 95% confidence interval, 17.4-77.0; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Management of scaphoid fractures across the Gold Coast Hospital Health Service ED followed commonly accepted practices involving x-ray and immobilization; however, this conservative approach to management is associated with increased health costs and low rates of conversion to a confirmed scaphoid fracture. Male gender was the only significant predictor associated with a scaphoid fracture.

Accuracy of claims-based algorithms for epilepsy research: Revealing the unseen performance of claims-based studies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate published algorithms for the identification of epilepsy cases in medical claims data using a unique linked dataset with both clinical and claims data. METHODS: Using data from a large, regional health delivery system, we identified all patients contributing biologic samples to the health system's Biobank (n = 36K). We identified all subjects with at least one diagnosis potentially consistent with epilepsy, for example, epilepsy, convulsions, syncope, or collapse, between 2014 and 2015, or who were seen at the epilepsy clinic (n = 1,217), plus a random sample of subjects with neither claims nor clinic visits (n = 435); we then performed a medical chart review in a random subsample of 1,377 to assess the epilepsy diagnosis status. Using the chart review as the reference standard, we evaluated the test characteristics of six published algorithms. RESULTS: The best-performing algorithm used diagnostic and prescription drug data (sensitivity = 70%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 66-73%; specificity = 77%, 95% CI 73-81%; and area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73, 95%CI 0.71-0.76) when applied to patients age 18 years or older. Restricting the sample to adults aged 18-64 years resulted in a mild improvement in accuracy (AUC = 0.75,95%CI 0.73-0.78). Adding information about current antiepileptic drug use to the algorithm increased test performance (AUC = 0.78, 95%CI 0.76-0.80). Other algorithms varied in their included data types and performed worse. SIGNIFICANCE: Current approaches for identifying patients with epilepsy in insurance claims have important limitations when applied to the general population. Approaches incorporating a range of information, for example, diagnoses, treatments, and site of care/specialty of physician, improve the performance of identification and could be useful in epilepsy studies using large datasets.

Motoneuron responsiveness to corticospinal tract stimulation during the silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Based on H-reflex data, spinal mechanisms are proposed to be responsible for the first 50-80 ms of the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced silent period. As several methodological issues can compromise H-reflex validity as a measure of motoneuron excitability, this study used transmastoid stimulation to elicit cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) during the silent period. Eleven subjects made 1-3 visits which involved 32 or 44 brief (~3 s) isometric elbow flexor contractions at 25 % of maximal torque. During each contraction, transmastoid stimulation was delivered in isolation to elicit an unconditioned CMEP and at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 50 to 150 ms after TMS to elicit a conditioned CMEP. Stimulus intensities for TMS and transmastoid stimulation were set to elicit a silent period of ~200 ms and an unconditioned CMEP of 15, 50, or 85 % of the maximal compound muscle action potential (M max), respectively. At all ISIs and intensities of transmastoid stimulation, the conditioned CMEP was significantly smaller than the unconditioned CMEP (p < 0.001). However, suppression of the conditioned CMEP was significantly less at 85 % compared to 15 or 50 % M max (p = 0.001). Contrary to published H-reflex data, the conditioned CMEP did not recover within 50-80 ms, remaining significantly suppressed at the longest ISI tested (150 ms). These data suggest the spinal portion of the TMS-evoked silent period is considerably longer than reported previously. Transmastoid stimulation, unlike peripheral nerve stimulation, does not impact proprioceptive inflow to motoneurons. Hence, relative to the H-reflex, the CMEP will be subjected to greater afferent-mediated disfacilitation and inhibition due to the TMS-induced muscle twitch.