The role of the bladder diary in phenotyping men with LUTS.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) grouped by 24-h urine output determined from a bladder voiding diary. METHODS: An online database was queried to identify men who completed a 24-hour bladder diary (24HBD), and the Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score (LUTSS) questionnaire from 2015 to 2019 using a mobile app. Data from the bladder diary and questionnaire were contemporaneously matched within a 2-week period. Additional data, including maximum uroflow (Qmax ) and postvoid residual urine (PVR), were obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR). The cohort was divided into three groups: normal, oliguria, and polyuria based on their 24-hour voided volume (24HVV). The LUTSS, 24HVV, maximum voided volume (MVV), maximum flow rate (Qmax ), and PVR were compared between those with oliguria and polyuria. RESULTS: A total of 327 men (mean age 62, SD: 19) completed the LUTSS questionnaire and contemporaneous 24HBD. Of these, 61% had a normal 24HVV, 13% had oliguria, and 26% had polyuria. A total of 147 patients from the study cohort had contemporaneous Qmax and PVR abstracted from the EMR. There was no difference in symptom severity, bother, or PVR among the three patient groups. However, several objective metrics were significantly correlated with urine output. Men with oliguria, as compared to men with polyuria were older (65 vs. 55 years) and had lower MVV (260 vs. 470 mL), fewer voids/24 h (8 vs. 13), and lower Qmax (8.5 vs. 18.3 mL/s). CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that men with oliguria or polyuria and LUTS constitute easily distinguished phenotypes that might require different diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. Those with oliguria were older, and had lower MVVs and much lower uroflows, suggesting that they are more likely to have underlying disorders such as bladder outlet obstruction and detrusor underactivity or may be patients with overactive bladder who reduced fluid intake to improve symptoms.

Polyuria in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: Prevalence and etiology.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) can be subcategorized into polyuria, normal or oliguria groups. Polyuria may be caused by pathologies including diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes insipidus (DI), or primary polydipsia (PPD). While fluid restriction is appropriate for some, doing so in all may result in serious complications. This study investigates the prevalence of these pathologies in LUTS patients with polyuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two databases were retrospectively queried for men and women who filled out a lower urinary tract symptom score (LUTSS) questionnaire, 24-h bladder diary (24HBD) and were polyuric (>2.5 L/day). Patients were divided into four groups: poorly controlled DM, DI, an CKD grade 3 and PPD. One-way analysis of variance compared 24HBD and LUTSS questionnaires. Pearson correlation examined LUTSS and bother with 24-h voided volume (24 HVV), maximum voided volume (MVV) and total voids. RESULTS: Among 814 patients who completed a 24HBD, 176 had polyuria (22%). Of the patients with complete data, 7.8% had poorly-controlled DM, 3.1% had DI, 4.7% had CKD grade 3% and 84.4% had PPD. Amongst the four different sub-groups, significant differences were seen in 24 HVV (p < 0.001), nocturnal urine volume (NUV) (p < 0.001), MVV (p = 0.003), daytime voids (p = 0.05), nocturnal polyuria index (NPi) (p < 0.001) and nocturia index (Ni) (p = 0.002). Significance was also seen between LUTSS and bother subscore (r = 0.68, p < 0.001), LUTSS and total voids (r = 0.29, p = 0.001) and bother sub-score and total voids (r = 0.21, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: 22% of patients with LUTS were found to have polyuria based on a 24HBD. Within this cohort, four sub-populations were identified as being demonstrating statistically significant differences in 24 HVV, NUV, MVV, daytime voids, NPi and Ni. Identifying the underlying etiology of polyuria should be carried out to safely treat patients with LUTS.