The Addition of Endometrial Injury to Freeze-All Strategy in Women with Repeated Implantation Failures.

(1) Background: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) after IVF remains a challenging topic for fertility specialists and a frustrating reality for patients with infertility. Various approaches have been investigated and applied towards the improvement of clinical outcomes. Through a nonrandomized clinical trial, we evaluated the effect of the combination of hysteroscopic endometrial injury and the freeze-all technique on pregnancy parameters in a cohort of RIF patients; (2) Methods: The study group comprised of 30 patients with RIF that underwent a hysteroscopic endometrial injury prior to a frozen embryo transfer cycle; another 30 patients with RIF, comprising the control group, underwent a standard frozen cycle with no adjuvant treatment before. Live birth comprised the primary outcome. Logistic and Poisson regression analyses were implemented to reveal potential independent predictors for all outcomes. (3) Results: Live birth rates were similar between groups (8/30 vs. 3/30, p = 0.0876). Biochemical and clinical pregnancy and miscarriages were also independent of the procedure (p = 0.7812, p = 0.3436 and p = 0.1213, respectively). The only confounding factor that contributed to biochemical pregnancy was the number of retrieved oocytes (0.1618 ± 0.0819, p = 0.0481); (4) Conclusions: The addition of endometrial injury to the freeze-all strategy in infertile women with RIF does not significantly improve pregnancy rates, including live birth. A properly conducted RCT with adequate sample size could give a robust answer.

Investigating the impact of different strategies for endometrial preparation in frozen cycles considering normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Uncertainty exists concerning the type, adjunct, or dose of regimen to offer in frozen cycles in infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Current systematic reviews have failed to identify one method of endometrial preparation as being more effective than another, whereas many IVF Units use variable and mixed protocols mainly based on their experience and convenience of use. Thus, we performed a four-center two-arm retrospective cohort study, encompassing 439 cycles in 311 women. The modalities analyzed were: Modified natural cycle without and with luteal support (Groups 1,2) and Hormone Replacement cycle (HRC) with and without GnRHa suppression (Groups 3,4). Various schemes of progesterone and estradiol were used and compared. χ2 tests for categorical data and t-tests for continuous data were employed, stratifying by exposure, along with univariate and multivariable Logistic Regression models and subgroup analyses, according to the number of embryos transferred (1 vs. ≥2) and day of transfer (d2 vs. d5). Group 3 presented with statistically significant higher live birth and miscarriage rates in comparison to Group 4 (RR = 5.87, 95%CI: 2.44-14.14 and RR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.06-0.60, respectively), findings that persisted in subgroup analyses according to the day of transfer and the number of embryos transferred. Progesterone administration through the combination of vaginal tabs and gel was associated with lower clinical pregnancy rates when compared to tabs (RR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.05-0.71). The stable estrogen protocol compared to increasing estrogen at day 5 was associated with a higher positive hCG test and clinical pregnancy rate, while the progesterone through vaginal tabs was linked with lower miscarriages compared either with gel or combinations. In conclusion, HRC with GnRHa appears to be superior to HRC without GnRHa, concerning live birth and miscarriage, especially when the number of embryos transferred are ≥2 and irrespective of day of transfer. The use of progesterone vaginal tabs compared to gel or combinations is associated with better outcomes. Age is a significant predictor of a negative hCG test and clinical pregnancy rates. A properly conducted RCT is needed to evaluate the optimal frozen embryo transfer preparation strategy.Abbreviations: SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; PCOS: polycystic ovarian syndrome; IQR: interquartile range; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Heat related mortality in the two largest Belgian urban areas: A time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Summer temperatures are expected to increase and heat waves will occur more frequently, be longer, and be more intense as a result of global warming. A growing body of evidence indicates that increasing temperature and heatwaves are associated with excess mortality and therefore global heating may become a major public health threat. However, the heat-mortality relationship has been shown to be location-specific and differences could largely be explained by the most frequent temperature. So far, in Belgium there is little known regarding the heat-mortality relationship in the different urban areas. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess the heat-mortality relationship in the two largest urban areas in Belgium, i.e. Antwerp and Brussels for the warm seasons from 2002 until 2011 taking into account the effect of air pollution. METHODS: The threshold in temperature above which mortality increases was determined using segmented regressions for both urban areas. The relationship between daily temperature and mortality above the threshold was investigated using a generalized estimated equation with Poisson distribution to finally determine the percentage of deaths attributable to the effect of heat. RESULTS: Although only 50 km apart, the heat-mortality curves for the two urban areas are different. More specifically, an increase in mortality occurs above a maximum temperature of 25.2 °C in Antwerp and 22.8 °C in Brussels. We estimated that above these thresholds, there is an increase in mortality of 4.9% per 1 °C in Antwerp and of 3.1% in Brussels. During the study period, 1.5% of the deaths in Antwerp and 3.5% of the deaths in Brussels can be attributed to the effect of heat. The thresholds differed considerably from the most frequent temperature, particularly in Antwerp. Adjustment for air pollution attenuated the effect of temperature on mortality and this attenuation was more pronounced when adjusting for ambient ozone. CONCLUSION: Our results show a significant effect of temperature on mortality above a city-specific threshold, both in Antwerp and in Brussels. These findings are important given the ongoing global warming. Recurrent, intense and longer episodes of high temperature and expected changes in air pollutant levels will have an important impact on health in urban areas.