Impact of social and demographic factors on the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in the town of Nice.

INTRODUCTION: Socio-demographic factors are known to influence epidemic dynamics. The town of Nice, France, displays major socio-economic inequalities, according to the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE), 10% of the population is considered to live below the poverty threshold, i.e. 60% of the median standard of living. OBJECTIVE: To identify socio-economic factors related to the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Nice, France. METHODS: The study included residents of Nice with a first positive SARS-CoV-2 test (January 4-February 14, 2021). Laboratory data were provided by the National information system for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) screening (SIDEP) and socio-economic data were obtained from INSEE. Each case's address was allocated to a census block to which we assigned a social deprivation index (French Deprivation index, FDep) divided into 5 categories. For each category, we computed the incidence rate per age and per week and its mean weekly variation. A standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated to investigate a potential excess of cases in the most deprived population category (FDep5), compared to the other categories. Pearson's correlation coefficient was computed and a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) applied to analyse the number of cases and socio-economic variables per census blocks. RESULTS: We included 10,078 cases. The highest incidence rate was observed in the most socially deprived category (4001/100,000 inhabitants vs 2782/100,000 inhabitants for the other categories of FDep). The number of observed cases in the most social deprivated category (FDep5: N = 2019) was significantly higher than in the others (N = 1384); SIR = 1.46 [95% CI:1.40-1.52; p < 0.001]. Socio-economic variables related to poor housing, harsh working conditions and low income were correlated with the new cases of SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: Social deprivation was correlated with a higher incidence of SARS-CoV-2 during the 2021 epidemic in Nice. Local surveillance of epidemics provides complementary data to national and regional surveillance. Mapping socio-economic vulnerability indicators at the census block level and correlating these with incidence could prove highly useful to guide political decisions in public health.

Hospitalisation avec ou pour COVID-19 : quel indicateur de surveillance choisir ?

INTRODUCTION: In the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, the monitoring of epidemiological surveillance indicators is a central issue. OBJECTIVE: We were able to describe the monitoring of the epidemic of hospitalized patients in the department of Alpes-Maritimes from three data sources: 1) Santé Publique France (SPF) via the SI-VIC software, 2) the Regional Health Agency (ARS Paca) with conventional hospitalization or department critical care data taken from SI-VIC, adjusting them to those of the Health Establishments (ES), 3) The ES of Alpes-Maritimes associated with the ARS of Alpes-Maritimes and the Department of Public Health (DSP) of the CHU, with the collection of patients hospitalized in the conventional sector or in critical/intensive care in the dedicated COVID-19 beds. The aim of this study was to verify the consistency of these three information systems. RESULTS: We observed disparities between the number of cases of hospitalization of SPF and the data from ES/ARS/DSP. We did not observe any differences in patients hospitized in intensive care/critical care units. The Scientific Council uses SPF data on the number of hospitalizations or intensive/critical beds to justify its recommendations.However, SPF data from SI-VIC have associated patients hospitalized for COVID and patients who tested positive for PCR, but whose reason for hospitalization is not related to SARS-CoV2 infection (formerly infected or asymptomatic patients). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that hospital surveillance indicators should only take into account the number of patients in conventional hospitalization or resuscitation for a COVID-19 infection.

Routine practice HCV infection screening with saliva samples: multicentric study in an intravenous drug user population.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized multicentric study was to evaluate the diagnostic contribution of screening for HCV infection on saliva samples in day-to-day practice in the intravenous drug-user (IVDU) population. METHODS: Between January and May 2004, 274 presumably HCV-negative IVDU were screened for HCV infection in 15 centers in France (median age 29 years). After centralized randomization, screening tests were performed on blood samples (arm A) or saliva samples (arm B). Screening tests were performed in 78 subjects (28%) had never been screened before and in 196 subjects (72%) who had had a negative HCV screening test on average 12 months prior to the beginning of the study. In the event of a positive saliva test for anti-HCV Ab, a serum test for anti-HCV Ab was performed. In the event of a positive serum test for anti-HCV Ab, PCR was performed on serum to measure HCV-RNA. RESULTS: Fourteen individuals were positive for HCV RNA (7 in each arm). Six of these cases had not been detected before. In eight cases, the median time between the last negative screening test and study inclusion was 11 months (range 6-94 months). CONCLUSIONS: Viremia tests were positive in 5% percent of the target population, although one-third of the individuals in arm A (blood samples) were not tested. The saliva test may be a useful alternative in the event of refusal of a blood test or when poor venous conditions compromise venous puncture. A confirmatory blood test still remains difficult to obtain in nearly half of patients.