Positive Airway Pressure Device Care and Cleaning Practices in the Pediatric Home.

BACKGROUND: Regular care and cleaning of positive airway pressure (PAP) devices are important for maintaining equipment in the home. Illness and hospitalization have occurred from inadequate cleaning and use of tap water in the humidifier. In recent years, ozone and ultraviolent-light disinfection devices have been advertised for cleaning home PAP equipment. Our clinic provides instructions; however, cleaning practices performed in the home are unknown. METHODS: A survey of home cleaning practices for PAP equipment was conducted in a pediatric sleep clinic during 2019-2020. Survey domains were method, cleaning and replacement frequency for each component, type of water used, instruction preferences, and demographics. The primary aim was to identify home PAP cleaning practices and compare with provided instructions. The secondary aim was to determine if respiratory-related symptoms (eg, congestion, runny nose, sneezing, coughing) occurred or increased with PAP use or inadequate cleaning. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 96 respondents. Most reported weekly cleaning of mask (36, 38%), tubing (41, 43%), and humidifier (31, 33%) with soap and water as the primary method for each. The majority used distilled water in the humidifier (74, 77%) and reported respiratory symptoms did not occur with PAP use (64, 67%). Very few indicated a device was used to clean equipment. No associations were found between length of time for PAP use and cleaning practices. There was a moderately low correlation between age and cleaning. Increased age was associated with decreased cleaning frequency (r = 0.20, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Care and cleaning practices of home PAP equipment varied from instructions provided in clinic. Most reported at least weekly cleaning of items for which daily cleaning is recommended. Few reported using a device for cleaning or having respiratory symptoms from PAP treatment.

Outcomes of Pediatric Titration Sleep Studies Following Empirical Use of Positive Airway Pressure and the Effect on Adherence to Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is diagnosed through polysomnography (PSG) testing and commonly treated with positive airway pressure (PAP). The initial recommended treatment for pediatric OSA is adenotonsillectomy, but when this is contraindicated or ineffective, PAP is the next option. Children followed in our pediatric sleep disorders center who are diagnosed with OSA and meet criteria for therapy are empirically prescribed a PAP device, usually auto-titrating PAP (APAP), to avoid delays in therapy. Titration PSG is performed later to assess adequacy of settings. The aims of this study were to determine how often PSG titration results in changes to empirically prescribed PAP and to assess adherence to therapy before and after PSG titration. METHODS: A retrospective medical records review was completed for children diagnosed with OSA, prescribed PAP, and had a titration PSG within a 5-y consecutive period of 2008-2012. Demographic data, type of device, pressure settings, and adherence downloads were reviewed. Adherence was assessed before and after titration overall and compared for those who did and did not have therapy changes following titration. RESULTS: The study included 121 participants. Median age at the time of the diagnostic PSG was 11 (interquartile range [IQR] 8-14) y. Most (106, 88%) were initially prescribed APAP. Median length of time between initial and follow-up PSG was 6.4 (IQR 4.4-10.1) months. The majority (94, 78%) had therapy changes following titration. Overall, adherence percentage > 4 h per night was not significantly increased post titration (P = .47). There were no statistically significant differences in adherence between those who had therapy changes and those who did not (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS: Titration studies resulted in therapy modifications for most children. Adherence was not increased following the titration PSG. Changes in therapy did not result in increased adherence. Titration PSGs may optimize empirically prescribed settings.

Role of a respiratory therapist in improving adherence to positive airway pressure treatment in a pediatric sleep apnea clinic.

BACKGROUND: Many pediatric patients need positive airway pressure (PAP) for treatment of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing. Adherence to PAP (defined as percent of nights with PAP use of > 4 h) is often poor and not sustained long-term. With any chronic disease, education has been shown to help with patient outcomes. Education of patients and parents regarding PAP can be provided by different healthcare professionals. There is no published literature assessing the role of respiratory therapists (RTs) in improving adherence to PAP in children. We hypothesized that the addition of RT visits to a PAP clinic would improve PAP adherence. METHODS: RT services for PAP patients were introduced in a multidisciplinary pediatric sleep clinic in May 2006. We identified children who had been followed in clinic, and had adherence download information before and after introduction of RT services. We collected demographic, polysomnography, and CPAP adherence data at clinic visits. RESULTS: Forty-six subjects met criteria for inclusion. The mean ± SD age was 14.9 ± 6 y. The mean ± SD apnea-hypopnea index was 26.7 ± 30 events/h. Other than the addition of the RT intervention, all subjects continued to receive the same clinical services as before. Subjects were divided into 3 groups, based on baseline adherence: 0% use, use for 1-50% of nights, and use for > 50% of nights. There was a statistically significant improvement in PAP adherence in the subjects with baseline use of 0% and 1-50%, but no improvement in those with > 50% use at baseline. There was no significant change in PAP use at subsequent RT visits. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization at clinic visits of an RT trained in the use of PAP improved adherence in pediatric subjects with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing when their baseline PAP adherence was < 50%.

Behaviorally based adherence program for pediatric patients treated with positive airway pressure.

OBJECTIVES: Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) devices are being increasingly used in pediatric populations for problems including Obstructive Sleep Apnea. There is limited literature regarding pediatric adherence with PAP treatment or successful interventions that improve adherence. This paper describes a clinical program for pediatric PAP users which was designed to improve adherence of patients prescribed PAP therapy and involves intensive assessment and behavioral intervention. METHOD: The design and implementation of the program is described, including the purpose, goals, programmatic structure, clinical content, type and training of personnel, strengths and limitations and financial concerns as well as the challenges with the development and application of the program's protocol. RESULTS: Preliminary outcome data show short-term improvements in consistent usage for many of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The program shows some promise and provides a framework for future program development and research.

An in-patient model for positive airway pressure desensitization: a report of 2 pediatric cases.

Application of positive airway pressure is frequently indicated in pediatric patients with a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Adherence to equipment use is often less than optimal and can be more challenging when working with children with special needs. An in-patient protocol was designed utilizing various techniques and strategies from the medical adherence literature and applied to 2 cases. This protocol utilizes specialists from various disciplines, including respiratory therapists, psychologists, physicians, nurses, and child life therapists, as well as parental involvement. This paper outlines this protocol using 2 case studies. Both patients successfully used their equipment for greater than 4 hours at night by the end of their hospital stay of 4 days and maintained or advanced these gains at follow-up. These 2 cases suggest that more research should be conducted to further evaluate the effectiveness of similar programs.