Trilaciclib use in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): are clinical benefits seen in the real-world setting?

BACKGROUND: Trilaciclib, in comparison to placebo plus carboplatin, etoposide, ± atezolizumab (PEA), has shown significant reductions in incidence of severe neutropenia (SN) among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Despite these findings, real-world utility remains limited. METHODS: A single-center quasi-experimental study compared trilaciclib + PEA (PEAT) versus PEA in ES-SCLC patients. The study period ranged from April 1, 2021 to July 31, 2022, for the PEAT recipients and February 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, for PEA recipients. The primary endpoint evaluated was incidence of SN after cycle 1 and during the treatment period. Secondary endpoints included measures related to myelopreservation and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Among 34 PEAT and 44 PEA patients, baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher median age (69 vs 64 years) and more males (64.7% vs 38.6%) in the PEAT cohort. The PEAT cohort exhibited a lower SN rate (3%) versus the PEA cohort (18%), with statistical significance demonstrated on multivariate analysis (p = 0.015). Additionally, the PEAT cohort also demonstrated significant reductions in red blood cell transfusion requirements (3% vs 23%; p = 0.02), grade 3-4 anemia (6% vs 25%; p = 0.03), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (0% vs 11%, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Trilaciclib, in combination with PEA, demonstrated an improvement in the safety profile without compromising survival outcomes in ES-SCLC patients. These findings underscore the potential benefits of incorporating trilaciclib in real-world clinical settings for enhanced patient care.

Concomitant Venetoclax and Imatinib for Comanaging Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Case Report.

Patients with synchronous malignancies can be problematic to diagnose and manage because workup and therapeutic targeting for each individual malignancy must be coordinated carefully. This report presents a patient with concurrent chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) managed with concomitant venetoclax and imatinib. Because imatinib is a moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor, close monitoring is required when using with a substrate of 3A4 such as venetoclax. Although the target dose of venetoclax is 400 mg, it was capped at 100 mg due to the interaction. Despite the interaction and possible enhancement of toxicities, the patient has tolerated therapy well, and both diseases have responded to this novel approach. In addition, because aberrant BCL-2 activity has been implicated in CML, the use of venetoclax may contribute to success in the management of this patient's CML. This case report represents the safe concomitant use of venetoclax and imatinib in a patient with synchronous CML and CLL.

Carfilzomib combined with rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide for relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

The CORAL study highlighted the need to develop novel salvage regimens in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) previously treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Carfilzomib (CFZ) can overcome rituximab chemotherapy resistance in lymphoma preclinical models by targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system. We conducted an investigator initiated, single-center, open-label, prospective phase 1 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of CFZ in combination with rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (C-R-ICE) in high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDC-ASCT) eligible patients with R/R DLBCL (NCT01959698). In the dose-escalation phase, 18 patients were enrolled at 6 dose levels with no dose-limiting toxicities noted. CFZ 45 mg/m2 was selected as the recommended dose for expansion. Eleven additional patients were enrolled in the dose-expansion phase. Overall response rate (ORR) was 66% (48% CR; 17% PR); 52% patients underwent HDC-ASCT. An ORR of 85% was observed in patients with nongerminal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL compared with only 13% in those with GCB DLBCL. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.2 months (5.1 months, not reached [NR]), and median overall survival (OS) was 22.6 months (6.8 months, NR). Patients with non-GCB subtype had a significantly longer PFS (NR vs 6.6 months; P = .0001) and OS (NR vs 6.6 months; P = .001) than those with GCB subtype. C-R-ICE is well tolerated in patients with R/R DLBCL with toxicities comparable to rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide therapy. Our data show that patients with non-GCB DLBCL benefit significantly from incorporating CFZ into second-line therapy and HDC-ASCT.

Treatment Strategies for Advanced Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Times of Dacarbazine Shortage.

The shortage of dacarbazine (DTIC) has created an acute and unprecedented crisis in the management of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, with DTIC being an essential component of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and DTIC (ABVD) and prior attempts at omitting DTIC from ABVD leading to substantial loss of efficacy. In this review, we discuss the strategies to manage classical Hodgkin lymphoma during the DTIC shortage and propose a treatment algorithm on the basis of fitness and ability to receive anthracyclines safely.

Cardio-Oncology Drug Interactions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

In the cardio-oncology population, drug interactions are of particular importance given the complex pharmacological profile, narrow therapeutic index, and inherent risk of therapies used to manage cardiovascular disease and cancer. Drug interactions may be beneficial or detrimental to the desired therapeutic effect. Clinicians in both cardiology and oncology should be cognizant of these potential drug-drug interactions that may reduce the efficacy or safety of either cardiovascular or cancer therapies. These risks can be mitigated through increased recognition of potential drug-drug interaction, use of alternative medications when possible, and careful monitoring. This scientific statement provides clinicians with an overview of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions in patients with cancer exposed to common cardiovascular and cancer medications.

Ofatumumab plus HyperCVAD/HD-MA induction leads to high rates of minimal residual disease negativity in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: Results of a phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab is a humanized type 1 anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Preclinical studies show improved complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CMC) compared to rituximab in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of combining ofatumumab with HyperCVAD/MA (O-HyperCVAD) in newly diagnosed MCL. METHODS: In this single-arm phase 2 study, 37 patients were treated with the combination of O-HyperCVAD for 4 or 6 cycles, followed by high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant. Primary objectives were overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate at the end of therapy. Secondary objectives included minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median age was 60 years; ORR was 86% and 73% achieved a CR by modified Cheson criteria. The MRD negativity rate was 78% after 2 cycles of therapy, increasing to 96% at the end of induction; median PFS and OS were 45.5 months and 56 months, respectively. Achieving a post-induction CR by both imaging and flow cytometry was associated with improved PFS and OS. Early MRD negativity (post-2 cycles) was also associated with an improved PFS but not OS. There were 3 deaths while on therapy, and grades 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 22% and 68% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The addition of ofatumumab to HyperCVAD/HD-MA led to high rates of MRD negativity by flow cytometry in patients with newly diagnosed MCL. Achieving a CR post-induction by both imaging and flow cytometry is associated with improved overall survival.

Evaluating the Effect of Six Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Antiplatelet Effects of Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND AND GOAL: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are responsible for the conversion of clopidogrel into its active metabolite and the metabolism of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which may also inhibit CYP enzymes. A current Food and Drug Administration advisory suggests avoiding esomeprazole and omeprazole while taking clopidogrel because of concerns that PPIs may compromise clopidogrel's antiplatelet effects. The objective of the present study was to examine the robustness of this interaction using a well-controlled study design in a population of participants free of confounders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy male participants, with a mean age 24.2 ± 3.2, were randomized to an incomplete crossover design schedule. Participants underwent platelet aggregation testing after clopidogrel alone, while on clopidogrel in combination with 1 of 3 PPIs (40 mg of pantoprazole, 20 mg of omeprazole, 20 mg of rabeprazole, 40 mg of esomeprazole, 30 mg of lansoprazole, or 30 mg of dexlansoprazole), and during 1 week of clopidogrel-only washout periods. FINDINGS: The median platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate during a drug-free baseline was 10Ω (2.5 interquartile range) of impedance and decreased to 0Ω on clopidogrel alone. Aggregation did not significantly change with concomitant use of PPIs and clopidogrel. CONCLUSION: These data do not demonstrate a significant interaction between common individual PPIs and clopidogrel in healthy volunteers who respond to clopidogrel alone. This adds data to a growing body of evidence indicating that the addition of a PPI may have a weak effect on clopidogrel's antiplatelet properties, and may only be relevant in specific clinical circumstances.